<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Tigers Predictions&#x27; in forum &#x27;Michigan&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Tigers-Predictions-21985005</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Tigers Predictions</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Tigers-Predictions-22098738</link>
<description><![CDATA[idlewillkill posted : I'm about ready to write off Wilis as a prolonged flash in the pan that's pretty much done.  I'm happy to be wrong, though.  Verlander/Galarraga/Bonderman *could* be a good trio, what I've seen of Galarraga at the WBC so far has been good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Tigers-Predictions-22098738</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Tigers Predictions</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Tigers-Predictions-21985005</link>
<description><![CDATA[grtgonzo posted : Since spring training has started, I was wondering if anyone had any predictions about the Tigers.<br><br>I just can't see the team playing as poorly as last year. Based on what I can guess will be a better starting pitching staff (Willis will hopefully contribute somehow and Verlander must be better), a better bullpen (can't be worse) and around the same offense, I am predicting an 86-76 record and missing the playoffs.<br><br>Anyone else? (We can update our predictions after spring training)  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Tigers-Predictions-21985005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:12:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

