<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: haha&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-haha-22000609</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: haha</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-haha-22003639</link>
<description><![CDATA[Corehhi posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1115065" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1115065');">amungus</a>:</small><br><br>"they're likely going to continue focusing on bypassing carriers and offering content directly via their websites, undermining the very plan designed to save them."<br><br>Good.  Tons of people do actually like the ability to just go to "network_name_here.com" and watch shows...  <br><br>It's easy enough for most people to simply watch the streams there.<br><br>And about being a 'dumb pipe' - um, that's the whole reason people went to broadband... Because AOL and the like are just pointless.  People want to connect to the internet, and be free to go where they want.<br><br>It's just a cable channel.  One 6Mhz slice of spectrum on a wire.  Nothing more, at least until channel bonding comes along.  Making a bigger deal out of it usually ends up making things worse for everyone.  One ought to be able to choose what they'd like to receive over that channel - hence, the internet was born...  If they try to turn it into a prison system, eventually it will overflow and the system will collapse under the strain.<br> </div>I am one of those people who watches the network feeds. I wish Discovery channel had a free feed. <br><br>What I like isd the ability to watch shows when ever I want to watch them. Simple as that. I also use Hulu on occasion.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-haha-22003639</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:39:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: haha</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-haha-22000618</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : Yup.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-haha-22000618</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:18:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>haha</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/haha-22000609</link>
<description><![CDATA[amungus posted : "they're likely going to continue focusing on bypassing carriers and offering content directly via their websites, undermining the very plan designed to save them."<br><br>Good.  Tons of people do actually like the ability to just go to "network_name_here.com" and watch shows...  <br><br>It's easy enough for most people to simply watch the streams there.<br><br>And about being a 'dumb pipe' - um, that's the whole reason people went to broadband... Because AOL and the like are just pointless.  People want to connect to the internet, and be free to go where they want.<br><br>It's just a cable channel.  One 6Mhz slice of spectrum on a wire.  Nothing more, at least until channel bonding comes along.  Making a bigger deal out of it usually ends up making things worse for everyone.  One ought to be able to choose what they'd like to receive over that channel - hence, the internet was born...  If they try to turn it into a prison system, eventually it will overflow and the system will collapse under the strain.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/haha-22000609</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:16:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

