 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to fifty nine
Re: Here's the problem said by fifty nine:No, it's because of the potential for widespread abuse, which is just one concern out of many. MILLIONS of people abuse alcohol and drive. Thus using your logic ban cars.
My main concern is how it affects TV reception in fringe areas. This has been proven not to be a factor. I live in a fringe area. I'm thinking about ditching cable for OTA. I'm not concerned on bit, but thanks for yours. I'm 100% for this. No one ask you to speak for me.
White space devices are like BPL. They may sound like a good idea, but in reality they are going to cause much more problems than they solve. It's NOTHING like BPL which by the way could have been futher along except a group of whiny little ham bitches that think it's 1929. |
| said by BF69:It's NOTHING like BPL which by the way could have been futher along except a group of whiny little ham bitches that think it's 1929. 'nuff said. Based on this statement you clearly have no clue about interference, what causes it, what levels are acceptable and how it's resolved. From the looks of it you can't tell an electron from an M and M.  |
