site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
329
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON

Crappy situation for sure...

This is not a good situation for ISPs no matter how you look at it!

Not sure about the profiting comment as the increase in consumption that would occur in most cases would have been absorbed in the rates due to competition, so this particular effort would only compound the problem for the industry.


Maynarg G Krebs

@teksavvy.com

approval from:
wvcaver See Profile

ISP's should send a bill to the XXIA's for each instance that they process.

The bill should be just as fair and detailed as your average lawyer's bill for a high-value service:

eg.

For services related to identifying an alleged infringing IP address -- $10,000

For review services pursuant to DMCA and any other relevant legislation -- $20,000

For postage and handling -- $200

Our total fee for this incident -- $30,200

Due upon receipt or we'll sue your ass.



jadebangle
Premium
join:2007-05-22
00000
Reviews:
·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
·Comcast

reply to R0CKY

said by R0CKY:

This is not a good situation for ISPs no matter how you look at it!

Not sure about the profiting comment as the increase in consumption that would occur in most cases would have been absorbed in the rates due to competition, so this particular effort would only compound the problem for the industry.
good situation huh? wuh? no! its bad!

Thursday, 31-May 13:28:43 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics