http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Crappy-situation-for-sure-22026852 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:27:02 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:27:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Crappy-situation-for-sure-22030307 said by R0CKY:

This is not a good situation for ISPs no matter how you look at it!

Not sure about the profiting comment as the increase in consumption that would occur in most cases would have been absorbed in the rates due to competition, so this particular effort would only compound the problem for the industry.
good situation huh? wuh? no! its bad!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Crappy-situation-for-sure-22030307 Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:39:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Crappy-situation-for-sure-22026907
The bill should be just as fair and detailed as your average lawyer's bill for a high-value service:

eg.

For services related to identifying an alleged infringing IP address -- $10,000

For review services pursuant to DMCA and any other relevant legislation -- $20,000

For postage and handling -- $200

Our total fee for this incident -- $30,200

Due upon receipt or we'll sue your ass.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Crappy-situation-for-sure-22026907 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:46:11 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Crappy-situation-for-sure-22026852
Not sure about the profiting comment as the increase in consumption that would occur in most cases would have been absorbed in the rates due to competition, so this particular effort would only compound the problem for the industry.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Crappy-situation-for-sure-22026852 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:37:33 EDT