http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041806 en Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:33:41 EDT Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:33:41 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-law-probably-says-an-opt-out-mechanism-must-be-provided-22044690
The bit about only sharing the information with business partners is a riot. Them selling your information constitutes a business relationship.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-law-probably-says-an-opt-out-mechanism-must-be-provided-22044690 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043947 said by Its a Secret:

"Public shame will keep them honest"?

That's the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Since when do these companies get ruled by shame? They're shameless!
Heh, right about that. Serious I think that public shame is the one thing that keeps them going, what gets their nuts off, but most definitely never did nor ever does indeed keep them honest. :P

h#7]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043947 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:11:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043605 said by Zach 58:

Privacy no longer exists
Actually, only those who have NO internet connection and NO cell phone.... can still have some privacy these days. No one will be able to find anything on my grandma. :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043605 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:19:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043428 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22043428 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:20:30 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042822 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042822 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:01:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042779 said by RadioDoc:

Wasn't "public shame" supposed to keep banks and the stock market honest, too?
In the case of the banks, good business practices would have have been sufficient, but the higher ups got caught up in the speculative bubble and started gambling with the money they were responsible for. When you ignore or misuse your own risk calculations, you are caught in a gambling fever that overrides lesser emotions, like shame.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042779 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:50:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042710 said by RadioDoc:

Wasn't "public shame" supposed to keep banks and the stock market honest, too?
Well WaMu had a run.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042710 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:35:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041839 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041839 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:49:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042045 said by Rogue Wolf:

Seriously. Didn't Verizon promise Pennsylvania a statewide fiber network a decade or so ago in exchange for preferential treatment regarding regulations... and then subsequently stiff the state once it got what it wanted?

People feel shame. Corporations feel nothing.
Yes! They did!
Here we are years down the road and much of PA is still sitting on their thumbs.
No one wants to remember the shady side of VZ.
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22042045 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:29:52 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041962
People feel shame. Corporations feel nothing.
--
Attention. Attention, please. We have the funk. I repeat, we are in full possession of the funk.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041962 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:12:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041925 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LMAO-22041925 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:04:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LMAO-22041806
That's the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Since when do these companies get ruled by shame? They're shameless!
--
"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LMAO-22041806 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:45 EDT