 | Groups Recommend Rules for Broadband Grants »tech.yahoo.com/news/pcworld/2009···ndgrants
Government agencies tasked with handing out about US$7 billion in broadband deployment grants over the next couple of years should provide competition in areas where existing services are lacking and should give priority to local broadband providers over national ones, some broadband advocates said Monday.
Scott also called on the government to fund high-speed networks, not just basic broadband. A carrier being local should be "a factor to their advantage," Pickering added.
"Funds should be targeted predominantly to unserved areas presently lacking any broadband service," he wrote in an e-mail. "This approach is minimalist in the sense that trying to do more is likely to be less impactful and more wasteful. Figuring out which areas meet an 'underserved' criterion and how to disburse funds in a way that efficiently addresses such 'underservedness' is a much more difficult task than identifying areas without service and directing funds to a provider to serve those areas." The gov't will be getting plenty of advice from competing groups on how to spend the broadband billions in the stimulus bill. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| said by fAcEtIOUs:Government agencies tasked with handing out about US$7 billion in broadband deployment grants over the next couple of years should provide competition in areas where existing services are lacking and should give priority to local broadband providers over national ones, some broadband advocates said Monday. Yeah, and pigs will fly 
That's absolutely the LEAST LIKELY thing to happen. If anything it'll be squandered on the biggest most entrenched players to use as they see fit--- probably in the heaviest saturated areas, too. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|