FisamoPremium
join:2004-02-20
Apex, NC | reply to PX Eliezer
Re: You can plotz with POTS. Businesses get multiple phone numbers all the time. You might consider transmitting a different CID number, provided you can get the outbound NAME to match the name sent from/with your business line.
For example, my daughter's pediatrician's number is 919-468-xxxx, but when they call us, we see 919-852-xxxx. Their name does show up with the 852 number, but the number that they have on all their literature is the 919-468 number. |
|
PX EliezerPremium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:12 Reviews:
 ·voip.ms
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·Optimum Voice
·Gizmo5
| Which is a good idea that I'll consider. Thanks.
-----------------------------------------
My original point, which I find pretty unfortunate, is that Verizon expects me to pay for hundreds of calls (by means of "message unit" charges) while being unable or unwilling to tell me what the calls are.
Yes, maybe in this particular case, we have figured out the explanation. And maybe it was inadvertently caused by my own actions.
But a few years ago, even before I ever started using Voip, Verizon just expected me to just take their word for all these local calls, with no itemization.
Voip providers should be proud that they can provide itemized call records (in real time, too!) when a big outfit like Verizon can't or won't.
|
|
FisamoPremium
join:2004-02-20
Apex, NC | Oh, you know it's the latter--won't. After all, were you to have a subpoena to throw at them, they'd pull up your list of local calls. What is it they're called on Law and Order, LUDs? (Line Usage Details)  |
|
