site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

reply to richdelb

Re: Bandwidth meter

no you need to back and research a little bit. Comcast DID NOT put the cap in place. It was put in my people sueing Comcast. The court said sue/ask and you shall receive. Well you did. A cap. Now start thanking the people that wanted it.


Veritas_36

@charter.com

said by hottboiinnc:

Comcast DID NOT put the cap in place. It was put in my people sueing Comcast.
Please remind us why the people were suing Comcast. Oh wait - they were suing because a cap already existed! A cap that Comcast wouldn't make public. "Use you connection less or we'll disconnect your service - So how much am I allowed to use it? - Not gonna tell you, just use it less". Perhaps you need to go back and research a little bit - the cap existed for a long long time, it's the outrage of the customers that made Comcast finally tell the truth about it.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

1 edit

customers sued? Try only one. They post on here. Also the cap was between 300-500gigs per customer. NOT the 250gigs it is today. People asked for a hard cap and they got one, 250 freakin gigs. If you don't like it then sue the person that sued them.

And by the way other providers have the same soft cap. Maybe you should go read the AUP/TOS of RoadRunner. It's available at: help.rr.com. it does NOT give any hard limits either. that SAME AUPP and TOS is set in stone for EVERY customer who uses RR for their ISP regardless if they're a TWC or Insight customer.



sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to hottboiinnc

said by hottboiinnc:

no you need to back and research a little bit. Comcast DID NOT put the cap in place. It was put in my people sueing Comcast. The court said sue/ask and you shall receive. Well you did. A cap. Now start thanking the people that wanted it.
Comcast DID put the cap in place BEFORE any lawsuits. It was just NOT disclosed and they got in trouble with the Florida Attorney General for having a non-disclosed cap.

Nobody "wanted" the cap except Comcast. We just wanted to know what it was so we could comply with the policy.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries.


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to hottboiinnc

said by hottboiinnc:

And by the way other providers have the same soft cap. Maybe you should go read the AUP/TOS of RoadRunner. It's available at: help.rr.com. it does NOT give any hard limits either. that SAME AUPP and TOS is set in stone for EVERY customer who uses RR for their ISP regardless if they're a TWC or Insight customer.
The fact that other providers do the same wrong thing does not make it right.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

its called read your contract and terms of use. if you don't like it don't sign up with the provider. instead of crying about it.

Don't have another provider start your own and compete.


Thursday, 31-May 09:08:52 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics