site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2175
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

Maybe america should stop tryiing to be the most wired.

And be the least wired. AKA all wireless, I recall seeing that verizon was working on getting 60m down to it wireless costumers, maybe every1 should. Then they would not have to pay to run wires everywhere, they could just put up a tower where ever the main internet "hubs" are. Easier to maintain from a certain point of view, you do not have to look for a break in the miles of wiring just on the tower, or in the stuff going to said tower.


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

said by me1212:

And be the least wired. AKA all wireless, I recall seeing that verizon was working on getting 60m down to it wireless costumers, maybe every1 should. Then they would not have to pay to run wires everywhere, they could just put up a tower where ever the main internet "hubs" are. Easier to maintain from a certain point of view, you do not have to look for a break in the miles of wiring just on the tower, or in the stuff going to said tower.
I think that is what will end up happening. The main reason this country is less 'wired' than some European locales is the sheer size of the place. There are some (many) areas of this country that are so remote that bears outnumber people 10 to 1. Places like that will never be wired, nor should they. Even in semi rural areas, it doesnt necessarily make sense to spend millions of dollars to provide access. With new wireless technologies slowly becoming viable (LTE, Wimax, etc.) I suspect that within the next 20 years we will see a shift from wired connections (cable, DSL, fiber) to wireless in all but the urban centers and surrounding areas.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-



DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1

reply to me1212
Is all of Russia wired ? Wireless is the way to go in Rural areas. LTE is going to really bring the internet to everyone.


me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

reply to wifi4milez
you too are both correct, IMHO. We need more wireless for 2 reasons. 1: easier to deploy just put up a tower and not run miles of lines, but still get service to people maybe 12mi away if you do it right. 2: less outages due to broken lines, some1 digin a hole for road work ect. will not be able to cut the lines and take out service for a lot of people.


Nuts65

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH

reply to me1212
Yes, and at a minimum of $60 a month capped at 5gb, it's even more profitable.


me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

Not ALL wireless ISP have a cap my fixed WISP has not cap and I now there are some mobile that have no cap. You just have to look for them, I can post a link to 1 mobile ISP with no cap if u want.



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to me1212

said by me1212:

And be the least wired. AKA all wireless, I recall seeing that verizon was working on getting 60m down to it wireless costumers, maybe every1 should. Then they would not have to pay to run wires everywhere, they could just put up a tower where ever the main internet "hubs" are. Easier to maintain from a certain point of view, you do not have to look for a break in the miles of wiring just on the tower, or in the stuff going to said tower.
As long as Verizon insists on capping usage at 5 GB a month and then charging $256 per GB then 60 Mbps down is useless.

me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

You do know you can get verizon with out a cap, right?

And after the 60m comes out the cap will most likely be uped. Maybe even done away with to gt costumer from other WISPs, like FiOS did with wired.



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

1 edit

said by me1212:

You do know you can get verizon with out a cap, right?

And after the 60m comes out the cap will most likely be uped. Maybe even done away with to gt costumer from other WISPs, like FiOS did with wired.
Um you were talking Verizon wireless. Not FiOS.
Verizon wirless data plans are caped at 5 GB a month.

me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

I know how to get wireless(verizon) with no cap.


Estragon

join:2003-06-20
Greenville, NH
Reviews:
·MV Communication..
·Fairpoint Commun..

reply to me1212

Except that wireless doesn't really work either

The big problem with wireless is that the technologies currently in wide use require a line of sight between the user and the access point. If you have line of sight, it works great. And if there is no line of sight, it doesn't work at all.

Big problem #1 is trees. Lotsa trees. We need 1 mile links that work through a full mile of trees.

Big problem #2 is hills. And other terrain.


me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

not all some can be, cell phones don't need a direct LoS(well mine doesn't anyway) they make antennas to increase the power of the signal, so some times you can still get it.



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to me1212

Re: Maybe america should stop tryiing to be the most wired.

said by me1212:

I know how to get wireless(verizon) with no cap.
yeah how because you are full of it.

Nuts65

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH

reply to me1212
I'm still with Alltel for the moment, and they have no cap. If you have a different one, I'd be interested to know who.

Thanks


me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

acun.com AKA »millenicom.com/. they resell verizon same service same price(I'm told ) but no cap, same as verizon with no cap.



FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

reply to wifi4milez
what about high latency? is there a form of wireless tech that has a low latency like any wired method (fiber, cable, twisted pair)?? last i knew even 3g had over 150ms latency



wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

said by FBGuy:

what about high latency? is there a form of wireless tech that has a low latency like any wired method (fiber, cable, twisted pair)?? last i knew even 3g had over 150ms latency
Yes. Both new wireless formats (LTE and Wimax) have latency that is fairly similar to wired connections.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-



FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

in that case, bring it on!



fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

reply to BF69
He's not full of it. If you buy your service from a reseller who sells it under their brand name, there is no cap.


hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

reply to wifi4milez
latency can be very low if even today's wireless technologies are used and the network is built right. I'm sure some of the WISPs on this board doesnt have 200+ms in their latency to start off with.

Anyone want to comment on their network's latency if you own a WISP. SuperDog?


Thursday, 31-May 13:37:34 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics