republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Will DOCSIS 3.0 Really Reach Rural America? » Maybe america should stop tryiing to be the most wired.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
How far? »
« Eventually, yes  
AuthorAll Replies


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice

reply to me1212
Re: Maybe america should stop tryiing to be the most wired.

said by me1212 See Profile :

And be the least wired. AKA all wireless, I recall seeing that verizon was working on getting 60m down to it wireless costumers, maybe every1 should. Then they would not have to pay to run wires everywhere, they could just put up a tower where ever the main internet "hubs" are. Easier to maintain from a certain point of view, you do not have to look for a break in the miles of wiring just on the tower, or in the stuff going to said tower.
I think that is what will end up happening. The main reason this country is less 'wired' than some European locales is the sheer size of the place. There are some (many) areas of this country that are so remote that bears outnumber people 10 to 1. Places like that will never be wired, nor should they. Even in semi rural areas, it doesnt necessarily make sense to spend millions of dollars to provide access. With new wireless technologies slowly becoming viable (LTE, Wimax, etc.) I suspect that within the next 20 years we will see a shift from wired connections (cable, DSL, fiber) to wireless in all but the urban centers and surrounding areas.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-


me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO
·VOIPo

you too are both correct, IMHO. We need more wireless for 2 reasons. 1: easier to deploy just put up a tower and not run miles of lines, but still get service to people maybe 12mi away if you do it right. 2: less outages due to broken lines, some1 digin a hole for road work ect. will not be able to cut the lines and take out service for a lot of people.


bender
Bite my shiny metal ass
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL
clubs:
reply to wifi4milez
what about high latency? is there a form of wireless tech that has a low latency like any wired method (fiber, cable, twisted pair)?? last i knew even 3g had over 150ms latency


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice

said by bender See Profile :

what about high latency? is there a form of wireless tech that has a low latency like any wired method (fiber, cable, twisted pair)?? last i knew even 3g had over 150ms latency
Yes. Both new wireless formats (LTE and Wimax) have latency that is fairly similar to wired connections.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-



bender
Bite my shiny metal ass
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL
clubs:
in that case, bring it on!

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
reply to me1212
Please try to "just put a tower" in the middle of any inhabited area these days and report back on how easy it was. Hint: NIMBYs have taken over.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

reply to wifi4milez
latency can be very low if even today's wireless technologies are used and the network is built right. I'm sure some of the WISPs on this board doesnt have 200+ms in their latency to start off with.

Anyone want to comment on their network's latency if you own a WISP. SuperDog?


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice

said by hottboiinnc See Profile :

latency can be very low if even today's wireless technologies are used and the network is built right. I'm sure some of the WISPs on this board doesnt have 200+ms in their latency to start off with.

Be careful now, you are confusing WISP offerings with (wireless) carrier 3G offerings. WISP's can build low latency into their networks, however 3G is inherently laggy as a technology. The new 4G networks were specifically designed to support low latency applications such as VoIP.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-


whozzit

join:2003-03-26
Westwood, CA
·DigitalPath

reply to wifi4milez
My ISP has been wireless since it's inception in around 2000. Prior to that the phone company offered DSL and, via that offering, kept other DSL providers out of the area. Wireless isn't governed by the same rules (no cable) so I signed up for Digitalpath before it was available, as did most other DSL subscibers in the surrounding three counties. We all enjoy wireless, faster-than-DSL service. I don't know what the telco is doing with their DSL these days.


Jafo232
You Can't Spell Democrat Without Rat.
Premium
join:2002-10-17
Boonville, NY
Bring on the blimps.

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to RadioDoc
Additionally, WiMAX on 10 MHz, under good conditions, has less bandwidth availabl ethan a DOCSIS 1.1 node, as far as I've seen.

Trust me, the only way that wireless is better than wired where you can get wired is if wired screws things up; there's only so much spectrum available and at some point you just can't cram any more bits into a Hertz.

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to wifi4milez
EvDO can do probably 70 ms on the last mile. Not great but not bad either. It's just funky routing that adds a good bit t that. I've seen speed tests with 80ms to a given site, Google if I remember correctly. Again, this was on EvDO Rev. A.

s for WiSPs, many of them use 802.11-based systems. These systems tend not to do so well under heavy load (case in point: my WiSP...as it turns out 60+ customers on one radio = EPIC FAIL) however when not loaded you can get better latency than nterleaved dSL and maybe even cable in some cases.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

sounds like you don't have a very well built network from your WISP.

And WiFi i wasn't confusing anyone. People should learn to use Cellular Networks when they say that or VZ/ATT/TM/Sprint. and Wireless for Wireless Networks- WISP.

There are also many WISPs that can support VoIP on their network as they deploy QOS and have built a network from the ground up and actually upgrade when needed.
-
Forums » Will DOCSIS 3.0 Really Reach Rural America?How far? »
« Eventually, yes  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 01:43:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [56] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [47] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [33] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [28] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [24] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [21] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [3] Monday Morning Links
· [2] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [Future9] Guaging interest. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]