 RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2 | reply to ptrowski
Re: hmmmmm.... said by ptrowski:Comcast. Personally I would not want it to happen, but at what point does a company no longer get away saying they are not a "phone company" also? My smaller indie voip companies get charged for it, so why is Comcast so special? It was a rhetorical question. You would only be punishing the customers.
How can you ever advocate raising taxes?
You should be advocating lower taxes and fees on independent VOIP companies. Never advocate raising taxes to "punish" a company - it never works. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| said by Rob:said by ptrowski:Comcast. Personally I would not want it to happen, but at what point does a company no longer get away saying they are not a "phone company" also? My smaller indie voip companies get charged for it, so why is Comcast so special? It was a rhetorical question. You would only be punishing the customers. How can you ever advocate raising taxes? You should be advocating lower taxes and fees on independent VOIP companies. Never advocate raising taxes to "punish" a company - it never works. Lowering them as we all know will NEVER happen. Let's be real here. Once they get their hands into the potential money source the states and the feds would never let it go.
I am a realist here. I would LOVE to see them lowered. I have seen the indies protest in to no avail. They then either go out of business or pass it along.
So Comcast can get all the publicity, press releases etc bragging about it but then turn around and say "but we are different"? Come on.
Again, I don't advocate adding them, it is more of a statement saying at what point can they get away with using the "but we are not REALLY a phone company" excuse?
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
| said by ptrowski:Again, I don't advocate adding them, it is more of a statement saying at what point can they get away with using the "but we are not REALLY a phone company" excuse? Never, hopefully, because they are not a phone company. They don't own or maintain a POTS network, and I would imagine Comcast Digital Voice to Comcast Digital Voice calls never touch the PSTN. Its analogous to saying a satellite company is really a cable company, because they it also carries channels that let you watch TV. The end result may be the same, but the two are entirely different animals.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
Beyond AM. Beyond FM. XM |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| said by BillRoland:said by ptrowski:Again, I don't advocate adding them, it is more of a statement saying at what point can they get away with using the "but we are not REALLY a phone company" excuse? Never, hopefully, because they are not a phone company. They don't own or maintain a POTS network, and I would imagine Comcast Digital Voice to Comcast Digital Voice calls never touch the PSTN. Its analogous to saying a satellite company is really a cable company, because they it also carries channels that let you watch TV. The end result may be the same, but the two are entirely different animals. Neither does an indie voip company though so I have a hard time buying that they are different.
For the cable vs satellite comparison we are talking about the delivery of data, not really the way it is delivered.
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
