 Dominokat"Hi"Premium
join:2002-08-06
Boothbay, ME
kudos:2
 ·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | reply to BF69
Re: U.S. Cellular Why only Sprint or Verizon?
Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM?
It would be the only GSM here now.
ATT currently covers only the southern half of the state. North, you roam onto Unicel (Verizon keeps the GSM going for roaming)
--
"I'm just a goof, looking for my ball." |
|
 swintecPremium,VIP
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
kudos:3
 ·RapidVPS
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
 ·VoicePulse
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Dominokat:Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM? Everything in the press releases and such had Verizon saying they were also going to hold onto the GSM equipment on the towers just so they could make roaming revenue off of it. I wish I knew if this was the case.
--
Block Accounts | UseNet Now |
|
Dominokat"Hi"Premium
join:2002-08-06
Boothbay, ME
kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by swintec:said by Dominokat:Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM? Everything in the press releases and such had Verizon saying they were also going to hold onto the GSM equipment on the towers just so they could make roaming revenue off of it. I wish I knew if this was the case. I can vouge that it is true.
I have a Verizon phone that suddenly went to full bars (from barely usable) when they converted Unicel.
BUT! I also have an ATT iPhone that roams onto Unicel (Verizon) and still does.
--
"I'm just a goof, looking for my ball." |
|
|
|
Reviews:
·Charter
·Clearwire Wireless
| reply to Dominokat
ATT would have to be bothered enough to do something that involves brains.
If you remember, this is the same company that built a fios to the node system and used 1.5 million boxes to send it to house, and will one day HAVE to wire fiber to houses, wasting 1.5 million per box. |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to Dominokat
said by Dominokat:Why only Sprint or Verizon? Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM? because they won't do it. at&t is too busy and financially tied down trying to get U-verse out everywhere. And as soon as they get u-verse out everywhere they'll realize they just should have done FTTH in the first place and start doing that. |
|
 RR ConductorHappy 40th AmtrakPremium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
kudos:1 | said by BF69:said by Dominokat:Why only Sprint or Verizon? Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM? because they won't do it. at&t is too busy and financially tied down trying to get U-verse out everywhere. And as soon as they get u-verse out everywhere they'll realize they just should have done FTTH in the first place and start doing that. AT&T will never have it everywhere, they don't even have DSL everywhere (my home of Redwood Valley being one), and they've had well over 10 years to get it out. |
|
BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by RR Conductor:said by BF69:said by Dominokat:Why only Sprint or Verizon? Verizon bought a GSM system and converted it to CDMA. Why can't ATT buy US Cellular's CDMA and convert it to GSM? because they won't do it. at&t is too busy and financially tied down trying to get U-verse out everywhere. And as soon as they get u-verse out everywhere they'll realize they just should have done FTTH in the first place and start doing that. AT&T will never have it everywhere, they don't even have DSL everywhere (my home of Redwood Valley being one), and they've had well over 10 years to get it out. My point is that at&t is not buying US Cellular |
|
