<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22076180</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:01:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:01:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22088127</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by r0gerr :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by nordoI   :</small><br><br>Charter makes over 1 BILLION a year.  The issue is the debt load, which Chapter 11 is helping them with.  They make plenty of money.<br> </div>if they are making plenty of money then they would be able to service their debt. hottboiinnc is right: they got too big, too fast. buying too many cable plants for too much money. <br><br>of course, bankruptcy will help them! <br> </div>You just repeated what he said. lol<br><br>Charter does make plenty.  They just have the debt load.  After Chap11 I can see them coming out a lot better.<br> </div>my point is that anyone can make money if you wipe out their outstanding debt. even someone with 100k in credit card loans and a million dollar mortgage with an average job can "make" money if you simply erase their debt. it's more important to look at what got them into that situation and avoid it in the future. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22088127</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:38:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22085310</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by nordoI  :</small><br><br>Charter makes over 1 BILLION a year.  The issue is the debt load, which Chapter 11 is helping them with.  They make plenty of money.<br> </div>if they are making plenty of money then they would be able to service their debt. hottboiinnc is right: they got too big, too fast. buying too many cable plants for too much money. <br><br>of course, bankruptcy will help them! <br> </div>You just repeated what he said. lol<br><br>Charter does make plenty.  They just have the debt load.  After Chap11 I can see them coming out a lot better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22085310</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:25:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22078707</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That servicing country/rural areas is not profitable for broadband and TV. Too much wiring, for too few consumers.<br> </div>Perhaps you'd be happy then to move to Washington DC to live just like any or all of the other lemmings that link that way...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22078707</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:59:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077430</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NetAdmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1553280"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It is proof that a company saddled with mountains of debt, poor management and poor customer service is a company that isn't long for this world.   That was the problem that Charter has. </div>And high prices. Their high prices may be alright in the boonies, but in the cities it served (like St. Louis, and parts of DFW) ATT and Verizon are a much, much better deal. <br><small>--<br>"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning." <br>-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077430</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:16:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077266</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : if you have VZW then the reseller is in your area. What part of "don't you get it" don't you understand. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077266</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:46:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : That may not be the sole reason, but it would be silly to discount it completely. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077115</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:16:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hottboiinnc <A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>if you use a reseller of the EVDO service via VZ there is NO cap at all.  That has been talked and talked about on here before.  <br><br>Also a reseller of VZW service offers Unlimited national calling over the VZW wireless voice network for $85 month to month- a lot less than what VZW charges.<br> </div>which part of "that does not exist in my area" is hard to comprehend?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22077014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:58:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076991</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1500643"><b>MOTO6809</b></A> : You are right, they paid too much for the systems they bought. That along with the shady upper management team they had really killed them. <br><br>I think Neil and the current team can turn it around, but they have a lot of work ahead of them to do so.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076991</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:53:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076786</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : if you use a reseller of the EVDO service via VZ there is NO cap at all.  That has been talked and talked about on here before.  <br><br>Also a reseller of VZW service offers Unlimited national calling over the VZW wireless voice network for $85 month to month- a lot less than what VZW charges.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076786</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:19:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076770</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : Ok yeah the reseller is the only way for the no cap, but if they can resell the 60m well I would like that. If you can get sprint you can use it. Yes they will take sprint if you can't ger verizon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076770</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:17:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  me1212 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I cannot justify the $256(I too say "WTF?".) A 100gb-250gb or even no cap look more likely, looking at their other internet services(DSL/FiOS). Anyway I know how to get verizon with no cap now, and I plan too in a few months. Mobile+no cap= win.<br> </div>don't expect that no cap to last too long. Once again I stated actual verizon service not a reseller. In my area you can only get verizon for 3G, that's it. And sorry there is no "cap free" option.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076652</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:01:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076519</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : I cannot justify the $256(I too say "WTF?".) A 100gb-250gb or even no cap look more likely, looking at their other internet services(DSL/FiOS). Anyway I know how to get verizon with no cap now, and I plan too in a few months. Mobile+no cap= win.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076519</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:38:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076502</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : Thank you hottboiinnc.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076502</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:35:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076469</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.attalascom.com/home/internet/highspeed.html" >www.attalascom.com/home/internet&middot;&middot;&middot;eed.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076469</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076464</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  me1212 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Yup, you only have so much wire, but repeaters can be used(to an extent) to boost the ranger of wireless. It makes it easier to serve rural areas, it can put out the same speeds as DSL and cable verizon is even working on(or so I hear) 60m wireless. With a 5gb cap you can not do much, but when they get it out they most likely will up the cap. <br> </div>yeah to what 10 GB maybe 15 GB? Cap or not cap, how do you justify Verzion charging $256 per GB overage?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076464</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : What kinda speed? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076457</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:28:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076452</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That servicing country/rural areas is not profitable for broadband and TV. Too much wiring, for too few consumers.<br> </div>That's not why Charter is $20 billion in debt. Try getting some facts first.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076452</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:27:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : VZ maybe working on it but ATT already has Wireless in AK. it makes more sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076421</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:22:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076392</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : Yup, you only have so much wire, but repeaters can be used(to an extent) to boost the ranger of wireless. It makes it easier to serve rural areas, it can put out the same speeds as DSL and cable verizon is even working on(or so I hear) 60m wireless. With a 5gb cap you can not do much, but when they get it out they most likely will up the cap. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076392</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:17:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : very true!.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076379</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:12:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : 1. One word: wireless. 2. just put internet then, or DSL may cost less. If done correctly rural areas can be profitable if they were not there would be no WISPs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076347</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:06:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by nordoI :</small><br><br>Charter makes over 1 BILLION a year.  The issue is the debt load, which Chapter 11 is helping them with.  They make plenty of money.<br> </div>if they are making plenty of money then they would be able to service their debt. hottboiinnc is right: they got too big, too fast. buying too many cable plants for too much money. <br><br>of course, bankruptcy will help them! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076268</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:51:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076232</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1553280"><b>NetAdmin</b></A> : It is proof that a company saddled with mountains of debt, poor management and poor customer service is a company that isn't long for this world.   That was the problem that Charter has.   It has nothing to due with them serving rural areas because they service some lucrative suburban/rural areas that, if they had decent management, would make them a very profitable company.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/6fo4su">"This is a bus.   You know how big a bus is?"</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076232</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:44:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076180</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hottboiinnc <A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> Charter just has issues with spending too much money and not making anything.<br> </div>Charter makes over 1 BILLION a year.  The issue is the debt load, which Chapter 11 is helping them with.  They make plenty of money.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076180</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:35:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076086</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : I wouldn't count all of their areas country or rural by far.  St. Louis by far is not country or even rural.   Charter got too big too fast and the only way they are the size they are is by picking up areas from other companies they didn't want. <br><br>But yet TWC services LOTS of rural areas in Ohio and i don't see them having any problems.   Charter just has issues with spending too much money and not making anything.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076086</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:16:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Yet more evidence...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076066</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : That servicing country/rural areas is not profitable for broadband and TV. Too much wiring, for too few consumers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22076066</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:12:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
