 RR ConductorHappy 40th AmtrakPremium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
kudos:1
1 edit | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: Seattle Paper Shifts Entirely to the Web I think that's sad too. While I love the always up to date, always on news of the net, there is just something nice about being able to hold a physical thing in your hands and read from it, and I think for that reason papers will always be around. |
|
|
|
 rcdaileyDragoonflyPremium
join:2005-03-29
Rialto, CA | The problem with having papers printed is that you have to recycle or throw them away. We used to throw away papers before recycling came into fashion. Not printing the paper in the first place can save a whole lot of energy at both ends of the process. I switched to online for a local paper this year. I'm glad not to have to collect and recycle. I can read the entire paper online (including classified and public notices). I can also go back to earlier editions, which isn't so easy with printed papers unless you like keeping stacks around in your house. |
|
RR ConductorHappy 40th AmtrakPremium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
kudos:1 | said by rcdailey:The problem with having papers printed is that you have to recycle or throw them away. We used to throw away papers before recycling came into fashion. Not printing the paper in the first place can save a whole lot of energy at both ends of the process. I switched to online for a local paper this year. I'm glad not to have to collect and recycle. I can read the entire paper online (including classified and public notices). I can also go back to earlier editions, which isn't so easy with printed papers unless you like keeping stacks around in your house. Then print them entirely out of recycled paper  |
|
| reply to RR Conductor
said by RR Conductor:I think that's sad too. While I love the always up to date, always on news of the net, there is just something nice about being able to hold a physical thing in your hands and read from it, and I think for that reason papers will always be around. Get a Kindle or other book/newspaper/magazine reader. I get the newspaper delivered directly to the Kindle daily and at much lower cost than the paper version. More and more, for those who still want to read a daily news offering and not sit at a computer to do it, the handheld reader is a good alternative. Something physical, easier to carry than a laptop, and can be used in the bathroom and outside in the yard or on the porch.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| Doesn't a Kindle cost upwards of $300+? That's a lot of newspapers before even coming close to recouping the cost. Plus it's impossible to share the paper amongst family members while lounging around drinking coffee on a Sunday morning. |
|
| said by probboy:Doesn't a Kindle cost upwards of $300+? That's a lot of newspapers before even coming close to recouping the cost. Well, I also read books on it(about 1 per week); weekly magazines like Newsweek; PDF docs I convert; etc. So while not justified just by newspapers; the savings on books, magazines, etc will pay back eventually. Besides when does using a new technology have to be justified by price alone - otherwise who would have paid what they did for iPhones.
Plus it's impossible to share the paper amongst family members while lounging around drinking coffee on a Sunday morning.
I'll grant you that. But if a family member also bought a Kindle(say a used Kindle 1 for about $100), they can share the newspaper & any books on more than 1 Kindle device at no extra subscription or cost needed. Family members on 1 Amazon account can have a book or magazine or newspaper on more than 1 device at the same time at no extra charge.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
