http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-is-this-news-22082106 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:10:58 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:10:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-is-this-news-22101727 said by tschmidt:

Vectorized VDSL sounds like a clever marketing term of little substance.No, the "vectorized" part really is an additional technology tweak. The crosstalk coming from adjacent pairs is cancelled out, and that crosstalk is the major impairment that DSL has to overcome. It's akin to the MIMO technology used in 802.11n, and similar techniques used in 1G and 10G Ethernet.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-is-this-news-22101727 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:05:51 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-is-this-news-22082106
BBR article points out AT&T is planning to using pair bonding for U-Verse.
»telephonyonline.com/access/techn···uts_bet/

Vectorized VDSL sounds like a clever marketing term of little substance. 500/6 = 83 Mbps so all this seems to be is using six-pairs instead of two. For individual customers single pair is enough to deliver multiple HDTV channels along with Internet access. However this only works by installing Remote DSLAMs at substantial cost. One has to wonder at wisdom of continued massive investment prolonging life of copper plant vs overbuilding new fiberoptic outside plant optimized for data?

/tom ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-is-this-news-22082106 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:44:27 EDT