republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Vchat20
Landing is the REAL challenge
Premium
join:2003-09-16
Columbus, OH

reply to fifty nine

Re: Cable demand "white space" revision

said by fifty nine:

said by Simba7:

Why would it interfere with Cable communications? It wouldn't, unless their cable shielding is inferior. It's like saying "Broadcast TV will interfere with Cable's signals". WTH?
Their concern probably has to do with interference to received signals at the headend. Broadcast stations are still received over the air, using high gain antennas. If white space devices proliferate, it could cause interference problems.

Yeah, there's probably a certain element of anti-competitiveness in it as well.
This is not always the case. Some use direct feeds either via fiber or some other sort of high bandwidth pipe. Granted, it's a crapshoot on what stations and cable providers do this. Those that don't, of course, still use the old standby of high-gain antennas.

Though with the article it's hard to say exactly what their agenda is. Could be trying to kill off broadband competition against their own services, could be the aforementioned concern over the OTA feeds to their headends, and of course it could also be ignorance abounds that they think it'll ingress into their cable plant-In which the only remote case I could see is at the consumer residence where these whitespace devices are in use and ingress into the cable plant through unterminate splits, bad cable, low grade shielding RG59, etc..
--
I swear, some people should have pace-makers installed to free up the resources. Breathing and heart beat taxes their whole system, all of their brain cells wasted on life support.-two bit brains, and the second bit is wasted on parity! ~head_spaz


fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

said by Vchat20:

This is not always the case. Some use direct feeds either via fiber or some other sort of high bandwidth pipe. Granted, it's a crapshoot on what stations and cable providers do this. Those that don't, of course, still use the old standby of high-gain antennas.
Not everyone uses fiber feeds, not by a long shot. Mostly larger stations (big four O&Os and affiliates) that opt for retransmission consent (versus must carry) use fiber feeds and satellite. Even DirecTV has been using antennas in many areas to receive local channels. Locally, Service Electric had to drop WTBY because when they switched to digital exclusively the signal was not receivable at the headend. It's going to become a bigger issue when everyone finally drops the analog. The smaller stations that depend on must carry will end up suffering.


Vchat20
Landing is the REAL challenge
Premium
join:2003-09-16
Columbus, OH

Like I said: It's a crapshoot.


Friday, 01-Jun 10:27:36 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics