 75153785 join:2009-03-24 Downers Grove, IL | reply to dadkins
Re: Nice.. Interesting but flawed defense. The only difference is the wording of a law. Practically, there is zero difference. That performance you are "not" stealing is indeed a service. |
|
 BetaTronSinzPremium join:2002-08-18 Brooklyn, NY | said by 75153785:Interesting but flawed defense. The only difference is the wording of a law. Practically, there is zero difference. That performance you are "not" stealing is indeed a service. It's not his or anyone's defense; it's the law. |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18 | reply to 75153785 Cable or sat, is/are provided and kept up as a service... as is power or water. A digital file in inert. Copying a digital file does not require upkeep or maintenance.
Yes, they are vastly different!  -- Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| reply to 75153785 said by 75153785:Interesting but flawed defense. The only difference is the wording of a law. Practically, there is zero difference. <tongue in cheek>In related news, 75153785 declares that the only difference between speeding, murder, and copyright infringement is the wording of the law. As they are all crimes, they practically the same thing.</tongue in cheek>
The fact that they have differences in the wording of the law makes it impossible for them to be "practically...zero difference". Saying that theft and copyright infringement is the same is just showing legal ignorance. |
|