sirghost
citywide
join:2005-07-23
Phoenix, AZ | BULLSH*T!!!
Dish is in complete violation of the do not call list as I continue to get calls from them even after I told them to take me off there own lists. At least they are willing to let a judge decide this out though. |
|
PapaMidnight
join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
| Dish itself may not be in violation, but the resellers are. Seems more like finger pointing to me on this one. Mind you, I am no defender of companies. The 8 mystery calls per 12 hour period I receive daily are enough for me to laugh at the DNC list. |
|
kfsutops
Premium
join:2002-08-19
Brandon, FL
clubs:  | Actually, the are responsible. They are subcontracting/sell for DISH or however you want to call it. It makes Dish ultimately responsible.
--
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" |
|
SnowyOne
Premium
join:2003-04-05
Kailua, HI
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Clearwire Wireless
| said by kfsutops  :Actually, the are responsible. They are subcontracting/sell for DISH or however you want to call it. It makes Dish ultimately responsible. It's absolutely disgusting to see the "It was an Evil Affiliate" excuse be questioned!
Who are you kfsutops to question the "It was an Evil Affiliate" excuse? huh, huh, huh?  |
|
Homunculus
Pipsquack
Premium
join:2000-12-14
Dar al-Harb
clubs:
| reply to PapaMidnight
said by PapaMidnight :Dish itself may not be in violation, but the resellers are. Seems more like finger pointing to me on this one. Mind you, I am no defender of companies. The 8 mystery calls per 12 hour period I receive daily are enough for me to laugh at the DNC list. Dish is responsible for the resellers. Dish is in fact, responsible. And so are the resellers.
--
Islam is a hate crime: »www.thememriblog.org |
|
kfsutops
Premium
join:2002-08-19
Brandon, FL
clubs:
1 edit | reply to SnowyOne
Right. I actually think AT&T was in a shitload of trouble about this same type a thing when the list first became law. I think they were being fined something like $700,000. I may not be remembering it correctly I must admit.
--
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" |
|
PapaMidnight
join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
| reply to Homunculus
said by Homunculus :said by PapaMidnight :Dish itself may not be in violation, but the resellers are. Seems more like finger pointing to me on this one. Mind you, I am no defender of companies. The 8 mystery calls per 12 hour period I receive daily are enough for me to laugh at the DNC list. Dish is responsible for the resellers. Dish is in fact, responsible. And so are the resellers. If that is the situation, have at it. |
|
