Re: Cable CO. ?? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22140137 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:57:15 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:57:15 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22146373 CaptainRR : I was about to say the same thing and you got to it before I did! Everything is about money and if they have to spend less money on maintenance, maintaining the cable plant. More money in there pockets, of course they are going to fight this kind of thing. If they dont want white space problems run cable out to rural parts if that will ever happen. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22146373 Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:29:16 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22142481 Simba7 : ..but that would also be an FCC violation..

I would like proof that White Spaces would cause interference with a Cable Companies' operations. If they can show actual proof, then I'll go with it.

..and I don't want the "It'll dip into our profits" BS. That's NOT a technical reason. I need one to be satisfied.
--
Bresnan 15M/1M|MyWS[P4HT 3.2GHz,2GB RAM,2x1TB HDDs,WinXP]|WifeWS[P4 2.4GHz,1GB RAM,60GB HDD,WinXP]|Router[2xP3@1GHz,640MB RAM,18GB HDD,Allied Telesyn AT-2560FX,Kingston KNE100TX,2xDigital DE504,Compaq NC3131,iPro/1000DP,Blitz BWI715,Gentoo Linux]]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22142481 Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:32:23 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22140165 Ignite :
said by Eat Me See Profile :

said by wvcaver See Profile :

If it interferes with cable then the cable CO. has a cable leak ! which is is a violation of the FCC !
Not if it's interference to received signals at the headend.
Cable receivers including modems should be more than insulated against low power external signals considering the various booming RF mess that is our homes, their RF assemblies insulated so that the only input they take is via the coax.

The alternative is that it's getting into the soft plant via an open tap, unterminated splitter or similar, in which case that open connection will also be leaking downstream signal and will likely be doing bad things to the cable network in terms of RF ingress and micro reflections with or without white space signals.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22140165 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:46:02 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22140137 RadioDoc : They already got provisions for headend protection. They are now claiming potential interference to equipment out in the 'hood.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22140137 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:40:04 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139904 Eat Me :
said by wvcaver See Profile :

If it interferes with cable then the cable CO. has a cable leak ! which is is a violation of the FCC !
Not if it's interference to received signals at the headend.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139904 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:02:17 EDT Re: Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139790 me1212 : Oh the irony!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139790 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:41:37 EDT Cable CO. ?? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139748 wvcaver : If it interferes with cable then the cable CO. has a cable leak ! which is is a violation of the FCC !]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22139748 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:35:39 EDT