 Vchat20Landing is the REAL challengePremium
join:2003-09-16
Columbus, OH | reply to BF69
Re: YouTube, Disney close to deal said by BF69:and yet some idiots will still choose to use torrents because they don't with ads even though they are very short. I don't think it's so much that, but quality and the adeptness of the flash players to use much more cpu than they should need to for most content (especially when you start looking into 720p content on hulu or YT).
At least this has been the case for me. YT's 720p has actually been the closest I can stand -when- worthwhile content is available. At least once it's ripped down to an mp4 file that I can view in what player I choose that will do so with cpu headroom to spare. And even the LQ and HQ youtube videos given availability of network programs are extremely reasonable even with the embdedded ads. But not a whole lot of shows are on there currently and a good large majority of my favorites are only found on Hulu which has a number of problems (personally).
Now if some of these people started using some sort of commonly agreed upon player like the Divx web player (ie: Stage6) and use Divx or Xvid with moderate bitrates, I'd be much happier to watch it on their site with ads that last as long as their on-TV counterparts! But until they can do something a little better, I'm gonna go for torrents which are much easier to use.
--
I swear, some people should have pace-makers installed to free up the resources. Breathing and heart beat taxes their whole system, all of their brain cells wasted on life support.-two bit brains, and the second bit is wasted on parity! ~head_spaz |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by Vchat20:I don't think it's so much that, but quality and the adeptness of the flash players to use much more cpu than they should need to for most content (especially when you start looking into 720p content on hulu or YT). that's bull. I have a 5 year old computer with a P4 3.2 ghz with 1.5 GB of PC3200 ram and an ATI 9550 video card and I can watch full screen 720p just fine. Your typical $400 wal-mart computer has better specs than that machine. So that shoudn't be an issue for the cast majority of people.
Now if some of these people started using some sort of commonly agreed upon player like the Divx web player (ie: Stage6) and use Divx or Xvid with moderate bitrates, I'd be much happier to watch it on their site with ads that last as long as their on-TV counterparts! Please most use Adobe flash player. Bitrates are fine. streamrates on most stuff is getting in the 1.2 mbps range or more. southparkstudios.com streams at 1.2 Mbps and it looks great.
But until they can do something a little better, I'm gonna go for torrents which are much easier to use. And ILLEGAL. but whatever |
|
 Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:1
 ·Bright House
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
| said by BF69:said by Vchat20:I don't think it's so much that, but quality and the adeptness of the flash players to use much more cpu than they should need to for most content (especially when you start looking into 720p content on hulu or YT). that's bull. I have a 5 year old computer with a P4 3.2 ghz with 1.5 GB of PC3200 ram and an ATI 9550 video card and I can watch full screen 720p just fine. Your typical $400 wal-mart computer has better specs than that machine. So that shoudn't be an issue for the cast majority of people. Not so bull.
Any of my systems that uses a variable speed CPU fan, crank up to max RPMs on those flash video sites. These are dual core systems w/ 2-4Gig ram and decent video cards; one is a dual Xeon workstation.
I don't know why flash players are so brutal on CPUs but my experience is the same as Vchat20. I have a friend who assembles web sites, and films his own video to flash. Perhaps he'll know why.
said by BF69:said by Vchat20:Now if some of these people started using some sort of commonly agreed upon player like the Divx web player (ie: Stage6) and use Divx or Xvid with moderate bitrates, I'd be much happier to watch it on their site with ads that last as long as their on-TV counterparts! Please most use Adobe flash player. Bitrates are fine. streamrates on most stuff is getting in the 1.2 mbps range or more. southparkstudios.com streams at 1.2 Mbps and it looks great. At one time, 'most' folks lived their online lives in walled gardens. If 'most' people were the gold standard for what our techno choices should be, you'd be posting this from CompuServe.
NV
--
In my perfect religion, a giant hole appears and sucks up all the lousy people.
I call it the Crapture. |
|
BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by Noah Vail:said by BF69:said by Vchat20:I don't think it's so much that, but quality and the adeptness of the flash players to use much more cpu than they should need to for most content (especially when you start looking into 720p content on hulu or YT). that's bull. I have a 5 year old computer with a P4 3.2 ghz with 1.5 GB of PC3200 ram and an ATI 9550 video card and I can watch full screen 720p just fine. Your typical $400 wal-mart computer has better specs than that machine. So that shoudn't be an issue for the cast majority of people. Not so bull. Any of my systems that uses a variable speed CPU fan, crank up to max RPMs on those flash video sites. These are dual core systems w/ 2-4Gig ram and decent video cards; one is a dual Xeon workstation. I don't know why flash players are so brutal on CPUs but my experience is the same as Vchat20. I have a friend who assembles web sites, and films his own video to flash. Perhaps he'll know why. So in otherwords my 5 year old P4 system is better than your set up. It has to be beause I'm not experiencing issues.
At one time, 'most' folks lived their online lives in walled gardens. If 'most' people were the gold standard for what our techno choices should be, you'd be posting this from CompuServe.
NV
a) why are you being nasty?
b) what does that have to do with anything? That is what they are using TODAY and TODAY is all that matters. If in a few years they are using more CPU intensive stuff oh well guess what CPUs are gong to be even more powerful then.
i think your bitching just to have something to bitch about. |
|
