Xure
join:2003-11-14
Beverly Hills, CA | Let 'er rip It is called progress. The inventor of the light bulb or the car did not really care about the candlemakers or coachbuilders.
No commercials? How about subscription services? There are other revenue stream than commercials. And maybe these media executives can take a pay cut? Why should we prop all these bloated media empires built on inefficient distribution models? How many media moguls with big downtown offices, personal assistants, vacation homes in Aspen? How many actors and divas that we spoil rotten with our money can we sustain? The better get used to being closer to the masses and closer to their actual trade than stacking money. How many Loren Conrads do we have to prop up? What the hell do they actually do that deserves all that money?
Get lean, get smart and figure it out. Netflix has it right. A monthly fee for all you can watch... And the media empire just might need to tighten its belt too. Maybe they just need to set their profit sights a bit lower. What makes them think they deserve all that revenue that they were able to siphon off to their own pockets? |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | said by Xure:How many actors and divas that we spoil rotten with our money can we sustain? That was solved years ago with reality shows that pay 3 or 4 digit salaries to their "actors and divas" on the idea that the reality show is just an internship for your resume and you really shouldn't be paid at all, but we are being nice and giving you a 3 or 4 digit salary. |
|
