republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Anti-Community Broadband Bills Return » Why dont
Search Topic:
 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Won't pass »
« NC, broadband, etc  
AuthorAll Replies

ZZink

join:2002-06-16
Etobicoke		reply to Edrick
Re: Why dont

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-03-31 14:57:35 · Reply to this

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
said by ZZink See Profile :

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-03-31 15:15:34 · Reply to this


packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs:
·Optimum Online
said by RadioDoc See Profile :

said by ZZink See Profile :

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.
That is a bit of a laugh.
--
Reach out and Tap someone!
to forum · permalink · · 2009-04-01 06:31:04 · Reply to this

Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
·Comcast
·Embarq

reply to RadioDoc
Regulations should be passed that force Broadband Internet Access to be delivered the same way Dial-Up Internet Access was delivered.

Before the widespread deployment of broadband internet access, a Dial Up ISP would order PRI's from the local telephone company and use them for incoming access by customers. There was a point when competitive local exchange carriers competed with incumbent local exchange carriers and actually drove the monthly cost of PRI's down. I know because I ordered PRI's and the reduction in cost was about 40%.

In the new environment, regulation would force cable and telephone companies to open up their networks at reasonable regulated prices to ISP's, then prohibit Cable and Telephone Companies from providing Internet Access. The other alternative is to split the Cable and Telephone companies into switching, content and transport providers.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-04-01 10:08:02 · Reply to this
-
Forums » Anti-Community Broadband Bills ReturnWon't pass »
« NC, broadband, etc  

Wednesday, 02-Dec 13:35:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [74] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [56] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [36] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· DK Weapon Upgrade [World of Warcraft]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]
· Furnace starts, then shuts off. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]