site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

reply to ZZink

Re: Why dont

said by ZZink:

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.


packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT

said by RadioDoc:

said by ZZink:

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.
That is a bit of a laugh.
--
Reach out and Tap someone!

Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
kudos:1
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..
·Millenicom

reply to RadioDoc
Regulations should be passed that force Broadband Internet Access to be delivered the same way Dial-Up Internet Access was delivered.

Before the widespread deployment of broadband internet access, a Dial Up ISP would order PRI's from the local telephone company and use them for incoming access by customers. There was a point when competitive local exchange carriers competed with incumbent local exchange carriers and actually drove the monthly cost of PRI's down. I know because I ordered PRI's and the reduction in cost was about 40%.

In the new environment, regulation would force cable and telephone companies to open up their networks at reasonable regulated prices to ISP's, then prohibit Cable and Telephone Companies from providing Internet Access. The other alternative is to split the Cable and Telephone companies into switching, content and transport providers.


Friday, 01-Jun 02:30:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics