<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Usage Billing&#x27; in forum &#x27;Cogeco&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22165733</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:31:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:31:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701503</link>
<description><![CDATA[exseven posted : sorry snick, i was replying to dan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701503</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:01:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701468</link>
<description><![CDATA[Snickerdo posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/815860" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=815860');">exseven</a>:</small><br><br>With all the people against QOS on the system, why are you asking for it?</div>I didn't say I was asking for it.<br><br>And, considering that Cogeco openly admits that they do packet shaping and have the hardware in place, there wouldn't be any capital costs involved to prioritize the three main VoIP protocols.  The only thing they'd need to do is pay the wages for the person who has to implement it and test it before going live.<br><small>--<br>You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs - Victory in spite of all terror - Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701468</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:55:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701441</link>
<description><![CDATA[exseven posted : Except that would need a lot of capital to do... you you pay an extra lets say $5 for SIP MGCP or Skype priority? Right now no specific QOS rules towards VOIP packet headers are in use, it is looked upon the same as any other RTP stream. <br><br>Cogeco's Digital Phone implementation utilizes PacketCable specifications and has separate service flows for the Digital Phone and the ethernet port on the eMTA.<br><br>With all the people against QOS on the system, why are you asking for it? Asking for VOIP priority is like asking for HTTP priority over P2P.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701441</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:51:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701431</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : It's not a terrible idea... but now you're talking about what people like to call "packet shaping" and I'm sure you know how that term excites everyone... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701431</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:49:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701253</link>
<description><![CDATA[Snickerdo posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1095016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1095016');">urbanriot</a>:</small><br><br>Even better, but then everyone would have to comply with the same standards... and they don't. </div>Giving priority to SIP, MCGP and Skype would cover 99% of all VoIP traffic out there.<br><small>--<br>You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs - Victory in spite of all terror - Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701253</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:17:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701243</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : Even better, but then everyone would have to comply with the same standards... and they don't. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22701243</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:15:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700791</link>
<description><![CDATA[dan991199 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1095016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1095016');">urbanriot</a>:</small><br><br>All right, so she said it's the same "circuit." <br><br>What's your point again?  I'm pretty sure that, even if Cogeco's VOIP was mixed into the internet pot, everyone would agree that the added bonus of having their Cogeco phone packets QoS'd at a higher priority would be a good thing...(?)<br> </div>no i think everyone would agree that having ALL voip phone packets QOS'd at a higher priority would be a good thing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700791</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:17:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700555</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : All right, so she said it's the same "circuit." <br><br>What's your point again?  I'm pretty sure that, even if Cogeco's VOIP was mixed into the internet pot, everyone would agree that the added bonus of having their Cogeco phone packets QoS'd at a higher priority would be a good thing...(?)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700555</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:49:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700090</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : ack..sorry for the bad grammar for all you grammar people out there, especially using your instead of you're! <br> <br>Anyway, here is the link to the thread I quoted Krispy from: <br> <br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r20769926-Does-having-Cogeco-home-phone-effect-my-internet-speed">Does having Cogeco home phone effect my internet speed?</A>. <br> <br>I have a lot of experience in this area and just want regular users to know the truth, not the spin version of it. I would believe what was said to the CRTC by Cogeco and Rogers, to anything that is posted in the Cogeco forums, after years of disinformation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700090</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:50:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700036</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/815860" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=815860');">exseven</a>:</small><br><br>separate physical circuit<br> </div>Any chance you can link him to the previous discussion over this topic with xeroid, where it was discussed in greater detail?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22700036</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:37:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699611</link>
<description><![CDATA[exseven posted : separate physical circuit]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699611</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:28:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699500</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : SIP or (session initiation protocol), still uses TCP and UDP and you make it sound like it's on a separate circuit, it's not. It still goes through the same nodes. Hence why internet is down, your Cogeco home phone will be down.<br><br>They are priortized on a higher level then normal VOIP traffic on the cogeco network. Cogeco was never directly asked this, but rogers was, and they admitted to it.<br><br>I just wish cogeco would get back up and answer more questions from the CRTC, very enlighting, it's a shame that certain people never learn things.<br><br>Just to drive my point home, here is a quote from Krispy directly in a previous post:<br><br> <blockquote><small>said by Krispy: :</small><hr>Correct. To clarify, it's not that Cogeco VOIP traffic rides on a separate physical circuit, it's just given priority over your regular internet traffic.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Please don't call me names, just stating the truth, no need to name call because your wrong.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699500</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:22:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699352</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by FreetheNet :</small><br><br>Cogeco does the same thing, so in fact, Cogeco is already sorting your vonage packets and making it a lower priority on the network then say Cogeco VOIP packets.</div>Cogeco is not doing that and you know it. Stop trolling. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699352</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:50:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699265</link>
<description><![CDATA[exseven posted : Cogeco doesnt prioritize internet VOIP traffic at all. Digital phone traffic is run on a separate stream from any traffic to the internet<br><br>If you don't understand how Cogeco digital phone works in relation to a SIP service don't comment on it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699265</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:39:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699087</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>= Fireblade <A HREF="/useremail/u/1577114"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A><br>No problems with Vonage for over 5 years.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Also I want to point out. Rogers has admitted to the CRTC that they use DPI to sort the packets and prioritize "their" VOIP packets over normal surfing and p2p and so on.<br><br>Cogeco does the same thing, so in fact, Cogeco is already sorting your vonage packets and making it a lower priority on the network then say Cogeco VOIP packets.<br><br>Now if your area becomes congested, your neighbor with cogeco home phone is going to have better call quality and no dropped calls, compared to someone using another VOIP service, you might not notice this on the user end depending on a lot of variables and congestion...yet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22699087</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:18:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22691983</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/700598" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=700598');">Last Parade</a>:</small><br><br>Got my second telemarketing call from Cogeco last night. They try to sell me on the phone service which is "$20 less" than what I'm paying for only 30 bucks or something. I tell them I'm paying $9.99 for VoIP (which could be less if I could be bothered) and ~$25 for 6 Mb DSL. They act surprised and I say have a good day.<br> </div>That $9.99 is with Acanac right? I think I'm going to switch to them once I find that Cisco VTA for under $40.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22691983</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:00:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690996</link>
<description><![CDATA[Last Parade posted : Got my second telemarketing call from Cogeco last night. They try to sell me on the phone service which is "$20 less" than what I'm paying for only 30 bucks or something. I tell them I'm paying $9.99 for VoIP (which could be less if I could be bothered) and ~$25 for 6 Mb DSL. They act surprised and I say have a good day.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690996</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:12:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690848</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : @gixxer<br>Yes they "do" throttle, but not the same way bell does. Packet disruption effects a lot more then just speed, depending on settings it can effect max connections as secondary action of time out and so on...<br><br>@urbanriot<br>They can do this, is the point. Aren't you the same person that denied throttling of P2P for years on this forum with that same kind of argument. Guess you don't learn.<br><br>@backness<br>Yep, but the problem is the only people they will be honest to are the CRTC, since they are the only ones that could do anything about it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690848</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:25:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690845</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1095016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1095016');">urbanriot</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by FreeTheNet  :</small><br><br>The alarming thing about this is, who is to say they aren't doing this on VOIP like vonage or other competitors, or certain websites. </div>I have friends using Vonage with Cogeco and they have zero complaints. I believe Gixxer has Vonage as well and could probably confirm or deny how well it works or doesn't work on Cogeco. <br> </div>No problems with Vonage for over 5 years.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1230347" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1230347');">backness</a>:</small><br><br>or perhaps cogeco could tell the customer who pays for service what they are doing instead of the consumer spending his/her free time trying to figure this out from imperfect information<br> </div>Indeed and they should explain it in layman's terms with examples, not technical jargon that the customer will NOT understand.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690845</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:22:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690814</link>
<description><![CDATA[backness posted : or perhaps cogeco could tell the customer who pays for service what they are doing instead of the consumer spending his/her free time trying to figure this out from imperfect information]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690814</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:16:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690800</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by FreeTheNet :</small><br><br>The alarming thing about this is, who is to say they aren't doing this on VOIP like vonage or other competitors, or certain websites. </div>I have friends using Vonage with Cogeco and they have zero complaints. I believe Gixxer has Vonage as well and could probably confirm or deny how well it works or doesn't work on Cogeco. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690800</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:10:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690619</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : They're throttling the upload, that I know for a fact.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690619</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:54:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690597</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1577114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1577114');">Fireblade</a>:</small><br><br>But but but... The network will degrade if they don't throttle!!!!<br> </div>Technically they are not throttling, the are using packet disruption. They are sorting packets and dropping certain ones to slow down the flow, which is actually far worst then what bell does, by just throttling.<br><br>The alarming thing about this is, who is to say they aren't doing this on VOIP like vonage or other competitors, or certain websites. <br><br>Sure they might never admit to doing this, and will play word games to convince the naive and less technical, but we all know they have lied about this in the past, even in these very forums.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690597</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:47:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690543</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : But but but... The network will degrade if they don't throttle!!!!<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690543</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:22:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690514</link>
<description><![CDATA[backness posted : Lets be clear here,<br><br>Cogeco representatives admitted yesterday to the CRTC that there was no need to throttle connections for about 95% of the day.<br><br>Anything they tell you about congestion is BULL. (as the 40 pages of comments correctly show)<br><br>Anyone from the Cogeco Staff want to comment on this? (your silence only implicates you in the steady stream of FUD and takes away from your credibility)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22690514</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:10:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22687851</link>
<description><![CDATA[Barry posted : I can't access mine either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22687851</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:09:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22686461</link>
<description><![CDATA[kushiro posted : Yeah, I knew that.  I've been using the My Account just about every day since the switchover, but the login wasn't working.  It seems to be ok now, I just got in and saw that the bandwidth page is still not available.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22686461</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:21:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685784</link>
<description><![CDATA[exseven posted : remember that 'My Account' isnt the same as your old selfcare login, you may need to make a login for it if you havnt already]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685784</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:51:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685641</link>
<description><![CDATA[Asawulf posted : No need for apologies, what I meant is that the outage is for the My Account section.<br><br>I don't even know why I mentionned the usage page only, maybe because the only thing I use My Account for is to check my bandwidth usage hehe]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685641</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:31:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685498</link>
<description><![CDATA[kushiro posted : My apologies in advance, Asawulf, but I don't understand what you mean.  I am having trouble not just getting to the bandwidth page, but into "My Account".  Does the outage include that login?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685498</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:11:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685443</link>
<description><![CDATA[Asawulf posted : There is an outage at the moment, the tools behind it are working normally but the access to the web page to see the bandwidth usage is down.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685443</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685411</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shamans posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1621889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1621889');">kushiro</a>:</small><br><br>Is anyone else having trouble logging in to their accounts?  I'm putting in the same password as always (and, yes, I checked the caps lock) but now I get redirected to an incorrect login page.<br> </div>same here]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685411</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:01:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685400</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hamilton1 posted : Yep getting the same message as you are kushiro.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685400</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:00:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685328</link>
<description><![CDATA[kushiro posted : Is anyone else having trouble logging in to their accounts?  I'm putting in the same password as always (and, yes, I checked the caps lock) but now I get redirected to an incorrect login page.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22685328</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:48:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22684312</link>
<description><![CDATA[ancodia posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by crapeco :</small><br><br>..maybe im just being too optimissitic. but i cant see how they can get away with such bad service..<br> </div>Where you gonna go? Alot of people served *cough* by Cogeco have no alternatives.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22684312</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:22:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22684249</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <br> this whole delayed usage meter and stuff is probably cogeco trying to pull a fast one on its customers...haha why not? they already shown they could care less<br><br> i have a feeling something will sway our way sorta soon..maybe im just being too optimissitic. but i cant see how they can get away with such bad service..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22684249</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:49:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22682838</link>
<description><![CDATA[manderson4 posted : Just decided to check my usage because I am such a good netizen and get this right now 9:20 pm July 09/2009<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cogeco.ca/outage.html" >www.cogeco.ca/outage.html</A><br><br>This page is temporarily unavailable.<br><br>We apologize for this inconvenience!<br><br>Please try again later.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22682838</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:21:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22680185</link>
<description><![CDATA[chdude3 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by cogeco talk  :</small><br><br> but once i CAN leave cogeco i WILL LEAVE for sure </div>Unfortunately, you and me both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22680185</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:20:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22679371</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <br><br> well im not happy with the cap but im taking this in light of the best were going to get. i mean i called and gave cogeco a piece of my mind and this and that so im taking the if you cant beat them approach because i have no choice right now<br><br> sad i know... tell them about comcast... 250 gb limit a month..wow if ihad that i wouldnt complain at all or leave cogeco..<br><br> but once i CAN leave cogeco i WILL LEAVE for sure]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22679371</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:45:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22669878</link>
<description><![CDATA[sonicmerlin posted : Why would you be OK with caps of any form?  They don't exist in other nations with competitive broadband industries.<br><br>ISPs have never been forced to open up their books to demonstrate how much each user costs them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22669878</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:59:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22665576</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :  hey guys..i just noticed BELLS 50 dollar a month DSL is 75 GB's for bandwidth limit per month.<br><br> so does that mean cogeos is gonna go up to that? that still sucks,,, even a 100 GB would sorta make me consider sticking around...<br><br> but once DSL is on my street TEK SAVVY it is.<br><br> i guess its a positive thing to see 75 at least.. u think cogeco would want to keep up with the competitor. ..useless cogeco!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22665576</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:01:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22664657</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I know you'd all like higher speed caps, but according to Cogeco bandwidth is an incredibly scarce and expensive natural resource.*  <br><br><small> * Except in Portugal and other such places with competitors. </small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22664657</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:09:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22662816</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : The way I see it is, if Tek Savvy can afford to give their customers 200GB of peer1 bandwidth for $29.99 / month I can't see why Cogeco can't do the same on all their $44+ plans. Also considering that they're a MUCH larger company and serve significantly more customers, they would get an even better rate with peer1 over TSI, I would even accept 150GB on their standard plan. Pro REALLY needs to be no less than 200GB, for over $80 a month, no way it should be less than 200, 250 is still even depressing but I feel it would be giving the customers a lot more to look forward to over the current limit and overcharges.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22662816</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:42:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22660712</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gruesome posted : If Pro had that cap I would have upgraded to pro and not left]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22660712</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:41:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22659319</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : It would make the pro plan actually worth it, right now it's useless.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22659319</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:53:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22659285</link>
<description><![CDATA[urbanriot posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1577114" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1577114');">Fireblade</a>:</small><br><br>Pro 250GB<br></div>Hey, then they'd be inline with Comcast's regular plan!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22659285</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:36:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22658608</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/328901" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=328901');">Snickerdo</a>:</small><br><br>If the cap on Pro was 200 or 250GB I can guarantee that there would be no uproar at all, and that the people who are angry would be a mere fraction of the people who are pissed off as hell right now.<br> </div>Standard 150GB<br>Pro 250GB<br><br>Maybe .001% might complain.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22658608</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:13:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Usage Billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22658568</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/815860" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=815860');">exseven</a>:</small><br><br>they would just find something new to complain about, my ping time is 35ms when it used to be 25 now i suck at counterstrike<br> </div>Don't lie to yourself, you were never good at Counter-Strike, ping nor God could save you!<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Usage-Billing-22658568</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:04:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

