 BenPremium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL | reply to hayabusa3303
Re: Personally... said by hayabusa3303:said by baineschile:100gigs and above is reasonsable for a cap. Above that, you are either a pirater, or need the business class. Even Tw business class has caps of the same usage. so how would business class help again? Oh?
As far as I know there's no such thing as "business class" that also has caps. However, I could be wrong since I not aware of the offerings from every single last company.
I thought the idea was that customers would be faced with these choices:
- Use "Residential class" Internet, which has caps and makes heavy use of video impossible.
- Plus use cable TV to get the video.
OR...
- Don't use cable TV.
- Use "Business class" Internet, which has no caps and costs more.
- Viola! The company gets your money anyway.
Now, faced with those choices I think using the "Business class" without the cable TV is still better, since it means more control over what you see. Plus it means that there aren't restrictions that the "Residential service" has, making it more flexible.
But....I think it's pretty much the money, or trying to raise the ARPU. |
|
1 edit | i will take this as a grain of salt dont know how true it is tho. »Re: TWC Business Cable
The source of the post is unknown but could be true.
edit is was posted with the Tw cap deal. |
|
 swintecPremium,VIP
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
kudos:4
 ·RapidVPS
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
 ·VoicePulse
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| Look up the posters posting history..you better take it with a very large grain of salt.......then get your blood pressure checked. 
--
Block Accounts | UseNet Now |
|
| i agree why i added that in there  |
|
AVonGaussPremium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL | The business service offering currently having no stated cap comes from TWC themselves in response to the "chatter" the last two days. |
|
