Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Other Manufacturers » [Siemens] Use Siemens Gigaset SE567 as a router only (no DSL)
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
4484
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies
-

loc8or

join:2009-05-08
Walpole, ME

reply to ChrisLawlor
Re: [Siemens] Use Siemens Gigaset SE567 as a router only (no DSL

I am somewhat new to the networking world but here's my situation.
I am running an Intel-based iMac with the se567 that I purchased on ebay.
Had litle trouble setting up, but my internet browsing has slowed considerably. I have the ethernet running from port 1 to the computer. Port 2 connects to base of 470ip gigaset handset. Nothing else connected. I had the network automatically set up through my system preferences.

Is there something I can do to get my browsing speed back up again?

Thanks,

David


ChrisLawlor

@eurotherm.com
reply to Doctor Olds
Thanks for the reply! It is the bottom design with the LAN/WAN port. I'll have to try this again next time I visit. I'll post the results in case anyone else would like to do the same thing.


Doctor Olds
I Need A Remedy For What's Ailing Me.
Premium,VIP
join:2001-04-19
1970 442 W30
clubs:

reply to ChrisLawlor
Click for full size
Which design?

Which design?
said by ChrisLawlor :

Siemens Gigaset SE567 router/DSL modem from Frontier. Is there any way I can configure that router to be used with the cable modem?

I've tried setting the LAN/WAN port to WAN, and tried all of the connection modes (Bridged, Bridged/IP, etc). I was able to connect to the router's admin from both a wired and wireless connection, and the router would get an IP address on the WAN side from Comcast, but there was no internet connectivity on the LAN side.

The Siemens apparently has a custom Frontier firmware installed, so some settings may not be in the 'right' places, but I think that I can find things provided that they are still actually enabled / available.
The Siemens Gigaset SE567 is a ADSL2+ Modem first and it also has a integrated Router w/ a 4 port Ethernet Switch plus Wireless added to it ("4 in 1" device). As far as I know the top design does not have a Ethernet WAN port so it cannot be used as a E2E standalone Router as normally the internal Router can only be used with ADSL Modem. However there appears to be a alternative design with the LAN port 4 wired as a switchable WAN port (and marked LAN/WAN) and that design might work. You would need to have NAPT enable so it can translate the Comcast DHCP supplied IP into Private IPs for the LAN connections (wired or wireless). Plus you may need to enter manual DNS IPs into the the SE567 DHCP server page. I suggest using 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 for that. However, if you have the other design without the switchable LAN/WAN port, then it likely would not work, so with you getting an IP on the WAN from Comcast, it does sound like the second design which you should be able to get that to work.
--
What’s the point of owning a supercar if you can’t scare yourself stupid from time to time?


ChrisLawlor

@comcast.net

[Siemens] Use Siemens Gigaset SE567 as a router only (no DSL)

Hi all,

My mother recently switched from Frontier (DSL provider) to Comcast. The new cable modem is not a router, and has no wireless capability.

She still has the Siemens Gigaset SE567 router/DSL modem from Frontier. Is there any way I can configure that router to be used with the cable modem?

I've tried setting the LAN/WAN port to WAN, and tried all of the connection modes (Bridged, Bridged/IP, etc). I was able to connect to the router's admin from both a wired and wireless connection, and the router would get an IP address on the WAN side from Comcast, but there was no internet connectivity on the LAN side.

The Siemens apparently has a custom Frontier firmware installed, so some settings may not be in the 'right' places, but I think that I can find things provided that they are still actually enabled / available.

I know that a 'real' wireless router would likely be much more effective, and certainly easier to set up. However, this is only for me to use when I'm visiting (I live 6 hours away, but come up often to see my kids who live near here with their mom), and I'd rather not spend any money on a router if I don't have to.

I appreciate any help or suggestions. Thanks in advance!

Chris
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Other Manufacturers


Saturday, 05-Dec 12:43:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [95] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Can I put insulation behind wires from panel? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· delete [Security]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]