http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22188280 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:43:53 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:43:53 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22536602 www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre···?t=87114

»www.ineedatech911.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22536602 Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:05:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22201023
It does both, and technically, you're still right since the traffic is back unencrypted at the exit node.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22201023 Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:36:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196372 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196372 Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:36:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196152
User --> Tor (ENCRYPT) ==> Park Manager ==> "Internet" ==> Exit Node (DECRYPT) --> Internet

To the park manager WISP, that traffic is encrypted, and thus completely indecipherable.

The traffic out at the exit node re-emerges unencrypted and back out onto the internet, yes, but at the hop which he's worried about, it is encrypted.
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn

I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196152 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:48:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196149 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196149 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:47:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196108 said by Nerdtalker:

If you're really worried enough to care, you should try the local coffee shop for searches or activity you find sensitive. That's what I'd recommend. That, or you can use TOR.
I agree that using a coffee shop might be a good strategy if you're trying to hide information from the party that supplies your usual internet connection, but TOR isn't going to help the situation where the traffic analysis is being done at the very point where you connect to the internet. All traffic you generate/receive goes through that end point, so unless it's encrypted, it can be seen by someone who really wants to see it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22196108 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:38:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190368 www.torproject.org/

It isn't perfect, mind you, the same snooping frequently happens at the endpoints of the routing (a lot of people have raised some concerns), but if you're concerned about the link inbetween, Tor can be a lifesaver.

There's a firefox derivative which has Tor built in which was used to be called Torpark, as well: »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XeroBank_Browser
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn

I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190368 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:24:49 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190358 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190358 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:17:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190083 all internet traffic (which in and of itself must be violating some FCC laws), it's unlikely.

The thing to take away is that yes, it definitely is possible to sniff plaintext traffic and extract what you're searching on google, e.t.c., but it's highly unlikely.

If you're really worried enough to care, you should try the local coffee shop for searches or activity you find sensitive. That's what I'd recommend. That, or you can use TOR.
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn

I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190083 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:01:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190054
There could possibly be logs which indicate that she examined the traffic, but if she's in control of the gateway which allows visibility into the trace, then she can also erase the audit trail.

You're better off using encrypted forms of transmissions such as SSL (assuming the other end supports it). Or use a VPN service, or Tor (which is free, but generally slow due to its nature).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22190054 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:51:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22189163 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22189163 Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:16:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22188994 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22188994 Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:42:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22188280
Hope this isn't too stupid of a question.

I live in a very rural RV/MFH park, and we have a commercial wireless ISP run by the park manager.

We are organizing for tenants rights, and are wondering if the manager can see our site searches, as everything is run through her office. We know that she can see whether we're logged on, and the normal admin stuff. It's been interesting that as soon as some of us began looking a landlord/tenant legal/organizing sites, things started to be repaired at those specific tenant's lots, things that had been promised for over a year. So...what can she see?

Hopefully,

Just paranoidly yours (but not wishing to be evicted).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Can-park-manager-view-search-logs-22188280 Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:54:21 EDT