 maartenaElmoPremium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·DIRECTV
1 edit | Socal. Well, there is plenty of competition in Socal.... half of the area is served by FIOS - of course not MY area which is AT&T, but I would bet they are not going to cap in Socal because of this competition.
There are several independent DSL sellers too, like DSLExtreme etc, which also have no caps.
I am moving some time later this year, and when I do.... I may change ISP at that same time too, IF TWC is crazy enough to impose caps.
I'd rather have a little less speed, knowing I won't be punished if I download too much.
--
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | said by maartena:There are several independent DSL sellers too, like DSLExtreme etc, which also have no caps. ATT would only be able to put caps on DSL where there are no CLECs at that central office (rural areas). Otherwise the CLECs will have a windfall, advertising no caps DSL to residential customers. |
|
|
|
 BitPremium
join:2009-02-19
00000 | True, DSL Extreme would have a field day if AT&T started capping. They already have excellent pricing and a lax AUP. |
|
 djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
 ·Verizon Wireless..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
 ·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER
| said by Bit:True, DSL Extreme would have a field day if AT&T started capping. They already have excellent pricing and a lax AUP. The question is, if all of AT&T and Time Warner's heavy users switch to DSLExtreme, can DSLExtreme handle the traffic? My worry is an overabundance of "hog refugees" would force DSLExtreme to move to a metered system. They'd still have good opportunity to be a little more fair about the allowances and pricing though.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.
|
|
