<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Geography in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22195504</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:12:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:12:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Geography</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22199041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/513687"><b>ReVeLaTeD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The United States has about 80/people per square mile. Japan, has 850 people/square mile. Face it, its just easier to service more people in condensed areas.<br> </div>You also can't lump them all in like that.  California alone has WAY more homes per square mile than 80, guaranteed, and don't get me started on areas like Houston, New York City, and Philly.  If it were a simple matter of people per square mile, California should be one of the cheapest deployments around.  It's not.  If anything we pay more for less.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22199041</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:19:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Geography</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196808</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The United States has about 80/people per square mile. Japan, has 850 people/square mile. Face it, its just easier to service more people in condensed areas.</div>Ah, the same old geography excuse.<br><br>Actually, I agree:  It's the geography:  The <b>CORPORATE and POLITICAL</b> geography, that is!   It has nothing to do with population density or a country's size--- because if that was the only factor, all the major urban areas would have the speeds and prices Japan enjoys.  They don't, ergo, that argument that it's all the geography is clearly <b>false.</b><br><small>--<br>"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196808</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:22:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This is ridiculous.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/540167"><b>JoeG4</b></A> : The major companies need to die! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196767</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:46:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Geography</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195504</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The United States has about 80/people per square mile. Japan, has 850 people/square mile. Face it, its just easier to service more people in condensed areas.<br> </div>Ahh, suuure, that's why NYC is <b>sliced up between providers, right?</b>  :uhh:<br><br>Please, PLEAHHHSE: <b>can we STOP with this UTTER BS corporate  false argument???<br><br>It is FALSE, for fcuk's sake, FALSE.</b><br><small>--<br>[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa.  You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true.  Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.<br> [/BQUOTE]</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195504</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:51:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Geography</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22194566</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1381016"><b>Lazlow</b></A> : Ok, but that does not explain metro areas or states like RI(1000 people/square mile).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22194566</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:22:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Geography</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22193713</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : The United States has about 80/people per square mile. Japan, has 850 people/square mile. Face it, its just easier to service more people in condensed areas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22193713</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:06:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22191240</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/571743"><b>Boricua65</b></A> : imagine healthy competition between carriers.  Image that!!  :uhh:  It never ceases to amaze me all they care about is money and not about provide service.<br><br>BTW, Japan is looking right about now  :D.<br><small>--<br>Yo te digo, el mundo esta jodido</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22191240</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:19:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
