<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214604</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22221414</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Thanks for todays paranoid "terrorist" boogeyman comment.  <br><br>You are 100% wrong but feel free to run wild with your dillusion.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22221414</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:57:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22221291</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mark H posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/552990" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=552990');">insomniac84</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by pleasiasarus  :</small><br><br>Yep, neo-cons er.. cons in general are placing all their chips on an attack.<br>It is all they have ... sadly.  <br> :(<br> </div>They are playing politics.  If there is no attack and they did nothing but cry that attack was imminent for four years, they will say left overs from bush kept us safe.  If some kind of attack does happen, they will say Obama ruined the safety of this country and is directly responsible for it.<br> </div>Bush planted the bombs in the WTC and blew up the levies in New Orleans according to the liberals.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22221291</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:18:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Labor Negotiations</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Labor-Negotiations-22218551</link>
<description><![CDATA[james posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/487382" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=487382');">dentman42</a>:</small><br><br>Diplomacy: The art of saying "Nice Doggy" until you can find a big rock.<br> </div>Diplomacy: The misguided idea that humans are rational beings who can get along with eachother.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Labor-Negotiations-22218551</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:17:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22218532</link>
<description><![CDATA[james posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1305437" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1305437');">puck0114</a>:</small><br><br>I think recent history has shown that fear-mongering is rarely useful.<br> </div>I disagree, if anything the past 8 years have shown how useful fear-mongering really is. Sure, it's wearing off FOR NOW, but just wait 10 years and do it again and you'll be able to use it to get all sorts of laws passed again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22218532</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:12:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217870</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : They are all terrorist's (?) foreign or domestic<br> in fact the local guys are somewhat scarier, "just doing it for america", have people forgotten Mcvay already?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217870</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:02:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217457</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : Exactly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217457</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:45:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Labor Negotiations</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Labor-Negotiations-22217324</link>
<description><![CDATA[dentman42 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1027040" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1027040');">myokitis</a>:</small><br><br>I'm sure the ongoing negotiations have absolutely nothing to do with this incident.  To paraphrase Clausawitz, "War is diplomacy by other means."<br><br>A dumb tactic, but one that has been used before.<br> </div>Diplomacy: The art of saying "Nice Doggy" until you can find a big rock.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Labor-Negotiations-22217324</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:17:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217316</link>
<description><![CDATA[dentman42 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1299892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1299892');">digitalfreak</a>:</small><br><br>I'm beginning to suspect that the person behind the TKJunkMail moniker is really Dick "WMD" Cheney.  It's all starting to make sense now...<br> </div>I think his username is very appropriate. He's about as useful and welcome as junk mail.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217316</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:15:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217156</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : Few people have the knowledge... those people become valuable to 'terrorists'.  They're never seen as valuable to corporations (all employees are liabilities except sales and lawyers as seen by CEO's/Wall Street)<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22217156</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:42:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22216109</link>
<description><![CDATA[insomniac84 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by pleasiasarus :</small><br><br>Yep, neo-cons er.. cons in general are placing all their chips on an attack.<br>It is all they have ... sadly.  <br> :(<br> </div>They are playing politics.  If there is no attack and they did nothing but cry that attack was imminent for four years, they will say left overs from bush kept us safe.  If some kind of attack does happen, they will say Obama ruined the safety of this country and is directly responsible for it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22216109</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:32:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22216091</link>
<description><![CDATA[insomniac84 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>But terrorist cells couldn't possibly be in the U.S., right?<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/digital_pearl_harbor_cyber_911.html" >voices.washingtonpost.com/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;911.html</A> </div>Nice hogwash.  That is pure FUD.  Even if our crucial systems are hooked up to the internet for anyone to break into, this isn't 24.  An outside hacker can't override people physically in the building.  Nor can he prevent the connection from being cut off to stop them.<br><br>From what I have heard(I think maybe on an NPR interview with some top official) the maximum damage a hacker could do is turn the power off.  The outage would last for minutes since the people physically there can turn it on and cut off out side access.  Then of course once the first station is hit, the rest would cut off their outside access and therefore this crazy terrorist country wide way of life ending plot becomes a 5 minutes black out in one single power station within the entire country.  Clearly, it's time to round up the Chinese and send them all to Guantanamo.  We could never ever survive such a plot.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22216091</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:29:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215611</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Yep, neo-cons er.. cons in general are placing all their chips on an attack.<br>It is all they have ... sadly.  <br> :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215611</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:56:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215443</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/737964" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=737964');">backfeed</a>:</small><br><br>I am a huge fan of technology. I also am growing concerned about how dependent we have become on it. This incident proves how easy it can be for a simple act to take out major chunks of the technology we use/need/want.<br> </div>The Washington Post internet reporter agrees with you:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/digital_pearl_harbor_cyber_911.html" >voices.washingtonpost.com/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;911.html</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215443</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:25:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215322</link>
<description><![CDATA[digitalfreak posted : I'm beginning to suspect that the person behind the TKJunkMail moniker is really Dick "WMD" Cheney.  It's all starting to make sense now...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215322</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:04:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Labor Negotiations</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Labor-Negotiations-22215071</link>
<description><![CDATA[myokitis posted : I'm sure the ongoing negotiations have absolutely nothing to do with this incident.  To paraphrase Clausawitz, "War is diplomacy by other means."<br><br>A dumb tactic, but one that has been used before.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Labor-Negotiations-22215071</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:14:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215060</link>
<description><![CDATA[puck0114 posted : You beat me to it. <br><br>Seriously, when people start living their lives in so much fear that every little thing sounds like a terrorist plot, the terrorists have truly won.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215060</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:13:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215051</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1305437" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1305437');">puck0114</a>:</small><br><br>Your supposition sounds a lot like fear-mongering. I think recent history has shown that fear-mongering is rarely useful.<br> </div>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5136227/Al-Qaeda-terror-plot-searches-continue-over-alleged-plan-to-bomb-Easter-shoppers.html" >www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop&middot;&middot;&middot;ers.html</A><br><br>But terrorist cells couldn't possibly be in the U.S., right?<br> </div>but an easter bombing in the uk (where lives would have been lost) is related to the cutting of a fiber optic cable in silicon valley how?<br>grasping at straws again, tk....<br><br>q.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215051</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215038</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1305437" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1305437');">puck0114</a>:</small><br><br>Your supposition sounds a lot like fear-mongering. I think recent history has shown that fear-mongering is rarely useful.<br> </div>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5136227/Al-Qaeda-terror-plot-searches-continue-over-alleged-plan-to-bomb-Easter-shoppers.html" >www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop&middot;&middot;&middot;ers.html</A><br><br>But terrorist cells couldn't possibly be in the U.S., right?<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/digital_pearl_harbor_cyber_911.html" >voices.washingtonpost.com/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;911.html</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215038</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:08:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215026</link>
<description><![CDATA[puck0114 posted : Your supposition sounds a lot like fear-mongering. I think recent history has shown that fear-mongering is rarely useful.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22215026</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:05:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214985</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>My post was made as supposition. His post was made as if it was a fact.<br></div>no, my post involves a similar amount of supposition.  the only differences, is when one is based on reality, the supposition generally points one into the direction of sabotage.  however, when one is grounded in the "fight terror, defend freedom" paleo-con talking points of yesteryear, people generally tend to think you are talking simply to further your political agenda against a president and legislature that has different beliefs and policies regarding "terrorism".  your thinly veiled attempts are easily recognized and spotted.<br><br>q]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214985</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:56:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214964</link>
<description><![CDATA[insomniac84 posted : Such a tough decision.  <br>A has happened before.  B has never happened before.  <br><br>It's just <i>so hard</i> to tell which one is plausible.<br><br>Maybe Tk needs to read <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_who_cried_wolf">this</a>.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214964</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:52:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214924</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1305437" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1305437');">puck0114</a>:</small><br><br>Any proof to support this? Or is this just some paranoid imagining? What next, terrorists are responsible for clogging American toilets?<br> </div>My post was made as supposition. His post was made as if it was a fact.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214924</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:45:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214882</link>
<description><![CDATA[puck0114 posted : Any proof to support this? Or is this just some paranoid imagining? What next, terrorists are responsible for clogging American toilets?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214882</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214878</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : my proof is just as valid as yours.<br>however, unlike most of your party, i subscribe to the belief that the simplistic answer is usually more correct<br>(&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor</A>)<br><br>so you tell me, which is more likely:<br>(a) someone trying to get their way in a collective bargaining agreement, given that both sides know *exactly* what fiber bundle it is<br><br>(b) some terrorist sleeper cell decides to come out of hiding and sabotage the fiber bundle that services silicon valley, researches the exact location and cuts it just to piss off the "american infidels" when actually silicon valley is not just the american devil anymore!<br><br>hmmmm....<br>call it intuition.<br><br>q.<br><small>--<br>those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214878</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:37:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214859</link>
<description><![CDATA[backfeed posted : I am a huge fan of technology. I also am growing concerned about how dependent we have become on it. This incident proves how easy it can be for a simple act to take out major chunks of the technology we use/need/want.<br><br>In my radio communication endeavors I always advise people that are moving to the new digital linked systems to keep the older units as backup for just this type of event.  <br><br>The thing that concerns me most is the eventuality of an EMP pulse being generated and lack of hardening on most commercial systems.  I pray it never happens but...<br><small>--<br>There are 10 types of people.  Those who can read Binary and those who cannot.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214859</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:34:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214849</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1520629" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1520629');">tubbynet</a>:</small><br><br>nothing more than vandalism.  someone trying to get their way and making sure that fiber was cut to make the maximum impact.<br>selfish, but vandalism nonetheless.<br> </div>And where is your proof?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214849</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:33:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214840</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>Potential terrorist walk thru for more widespread damage planned against US infrastructure?<br>...<br>...<br>...<br>So I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that was just pure vandalism.<br></div>mmmm, nothing like paleo-con wet dreams.  should we bomb iran now?<br>come on, tk.  i would think given you incredible anti-union bias that you would *jump* at the chance to blame them...oh wait, i forgot which party was in office.  obviously they heard gitmo was closed :uhh:<br><br>nothing more than vandalism.  someone trying to get their way and making sure that fiber was cut to make the maximum impact.<br>selfish, but vandalism nonetheless.<br><br>q.<br><br><small><i>[edit] spelling </i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214840</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:31:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Terrorist dry-run for larger attacks??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214604</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : Potential terrorist walk thru for more widespread damage planned against US infrastructure? <br><br>There are a few dozen choke points in the fiber backbones in the US that are only marginally protected. Those knowing where they are(and many people in the industry and also large national customers know that info) could wreak havoc on the internet and also landline phone systems in the US.<br><br>So I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that was just pure vandalism.<br><br>P.S.>> News items say the cuts have all been repaired.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Terrorist-dryrun-for-larger-attacks-22214604</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:37:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

