jadebangle
Premium
join:2007-05-22
Olathe, KS
 ·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
 ·Comcast
| reply to Eat Me
Re: Can't complain.
said by Eat Me  :But with 1.5M upload? My cable connection does better. Even OOL Boost does better. The upload is just as important as download
it isn't anymore useful to have 24/1.5 vs 5/5 for about the same price. Most website won't allow you to download faster then 1.5mbps so its only in rare cases or few place that you can exceed this speed
I'll still prefer 5/5 over 10/1 or 20/2 etc
even 20/5 isn't much better then 5/5
I could probably leech faster occasionally on 20/5 but its not a big deal since I'm not an impatient bastard like few who even think 100/1 is cool with them... who see upload speed as least important.
Too much download speed is useless without decent upload speed to compensate for it...
|
|
Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| said by jadebangle :said by Eat Me :But with 1.5M upload? My cable connection does better. Even OOL Boost does better. The upload is just as important as download it isn't anymore useful to have 24/1.5 vs 5/5 for about the same price. Most website won't allow you to download faster then 1.5mbps so its only in rare cases or few place that you can exceed this speed Too much download speed is useless without decent upload speed to compensate for it... Your first statement is absolutely false. Put a 10Mbps or higher line next to a 1.5Mbps line and it's night and day. My 15Mbps fiber line has slightly higher letancy to most sites than my 1.5Mbps Road Runner line, but my fiber line destroys my RR line when comparing browsing speeds. It's night and day.
Your last statement is true however. But 1.5Mbps and up is a good upstream number for the vast majority of people. I only have 2Mbps and while 5Mbps upstream is available to me, 2Mbps is great. |
|
PapaMidnight
join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
| reply to jadebangle
said by jadebangle :Most website won't allow you to download faster then 1.5mbps so its only in rare cases or few place that you can exceed this speed Were you serious?
I can easily do 80mbps at Uni from almost any website I travel too (with the exception of a few which I know for a fact are on 10mbit links).
I hate how many people just nonchalantly throw out this statement like we're all still on AOL Dial-Up or something. |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
 ·magicjack.com
 ·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| reply to jadebangle
I'd take 10/5 over 24/1.5 any day of the week. However they're competing with 20/1.5 on a shared (cable) system, so they're clearly the better option 
As for websites, where are you going that only has 1.5 Mbps downloads? I can max out my connection here DL/ULing from my personal site ($7.50 per month is the basic plan...I got a better deal though) and seems like any servers with anything to download these days are on 100 Mbps ports... |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| reply to Matt
Exactly. The "inflection points" on internet these days are 768k (broadband), 1.5 Mbps (more video streaming), 5 Mbps (HD video in some cases) and 15 Mbps (rocking connectivity). If you're moving from one tier to the other it does make a rather big difference. On uploads, 384k, 768k, 1.5-2M and 5M are probably the big ones. |
|
Eat Me
join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ | reply to Matt
Have to agree here.
When I went to 30Mbps DOCSIS3 it was night and day. Pages loaded instantly, no lag time or waiting. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
| said by Eat Me :Have to agree here. When I went to 30Mbps DOCSIS3 it was night and day. Pages loaded instantly, no lag time or waiting. The bandwidth rarely matters anymore in page loading speed, your browser, your CPU, your RAM, number of files comprising the page (CSS, JS, images, AJAX, iframes), and especially the CPU, DB, and HDs on the website your using. If the CPU stalls on the website or there is disk I/O congestion, there is nothing you can do about that lag. |
|
Eat Me
join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage
| said by patcat88 :said by Eat Me :Have to agree here. When I went to 30Mbps DOCSIS3 it was night and day. Pages loaded instantly, no lag time or waiting. The bandwidth rarely matters anymore in page loading speed, your browser, your CPU, your RAM, number of files comprising the page (CSS, JS, images, AJAX, iframes), and especially the CPU, DB, and HDs on the website your using. If the CPU stalls on the website or there is disk I/O congestion, there is nothing you can do about that lag. Actually on a lot of sites it does matter. Reason being that a lot of sites are full of rich content such as flash and the like. |
|
aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to iansltx
said by iansltx :Exactly. The "inflection points" on internet these days are 768k (broadband), 1.5 Mbps (more video streaming), 5 Mbps (HD video in some cases) and 15 Mbps (rocking connectivity). If you're moving from one tier to the other it does make a rather big difference. On uploads, 384k, 768k, 1.5-2M and 5M are probably the big ones. I'd say 15mbs is very slow. I have a 50mbs line and I'm ready for it to be faster. |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| What do you do on said 50 Mbps line? What sites can serve up content at the full 50? Not trying to be antagonistic here; I freaking love the connections I get with the VPSes I have (yay $10 per month for 400GB of transfer on a 100Mbit port...plus a 20GB, 512-1024MB RAM server to run on the connection!). Plus the OC3 that my school is on, when it wasn't so overloaded. Looking forward to the gigabit link we'll be getting *any day now* |
|
