dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
56644
share rss forum feed


La Luna
RIP Lisa
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3
reply to moonpuppy

Re: foxnews.com infected?

So after all of this, is the site still infected? Did anyone let them know there was a problem?


fatness
subtle
Premium,ex-mod 01-13
join:2000-11-17
fishing
kudos:14
At least 2 people did earlier in this thread:

»foxnews.com infected?
»Re: foxnews.com infected?

Like you said, memory is the first thing to go.
--
goodbye dad


La Luna
RIP Lisa
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3
said by fatness:

At least 2 people did earlier in this thread:

»foxnews.com infected?
»Re: foxnews.com infected?

Like you said, memory is the first thing to go.
ahhh shaddup you old monkey.
--
You can chain my body to the earth, but still my spirit flies!

13,143 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11

karateckie

join:2009-04-27
Kansas City, MO
reply to Doctor Four
said by Doctor Four:

Although this sounds like a simple answer, it is really a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And malvertisements aren't solely found on music streaming sites or those owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Any site that uses an advertiser which accepts an ad campaign on short notice without doing some investigation into the ad buyers can get hit by this; Google's Doubleclick ad network, one of the largest, got hit last year sometime.
I agree with you Doctor. I know of a few sites with similar issues lately (there was a recent article I found...from early April...about the same issue with Yahoo). It's interesting about the playlist.com thing. I use that site and will have to keep an eye on it. Anyway, we have a very large network where it would be a nightmare to migrate everyone to Firefox and train them to use no script. While I use the same setup at home and on my computers at work, it's not a viable solution in our environment.

However blocking ads is a great solution! Unfortunately, we are in the middle of working out how to block them (we used to block them through our web filtering provider..which has changed). They new web filtering provider can't/won't block ads. I suppose it's the nature of the provider, being a free service they advertise on their sites and thus don't want to provide ad blocking. Other options are hosts files (but maintaining them in a large network...ugh), not to mention sending Dequests to 127.0.0.1 take awhile to time out, and if put in a DNS server can seriously cripple it with many clients.

Anyway...the end result is for the time being, Fox News is blocked. We haven't seen issues from other sites at this point, and eventually it will be unblocked.

I think the real issue lies in the websites who allow advertising on their site. They need to take some responsibility in what they are displaying, whether it comes from their own servers or not. The end result is that Fox, Yahoo, Google and others are being poorly represented when someone browses to what they believe should be a solid, and trusted site, only to get a virus. Companies need to demand accountability from the ad providers that pay them to display ads.

In the meantime...to minimize risks we'll block any site that we have issues with, as well as research better alternative to blocking ads


ZInkDude

@optonline.net
reply to moonpuppy
I got similar infection from DrudgeReport.com (on 2 different occasions); All IPs traced back to Ukraine.

Please note people - you may think you removed it, but really did not. Malwarebytes and others do not detect Rootkits. You should run ROOTKITREVEALER. I thought I had cleaned this, and I had really not. There was a deep and nasty rootkit involved here. Only way to remove was to boot off a Windows CD, and delete hidden drivers. I would be willing to bet that half the people think they clean this stuff and its not really clean.