Re: lte in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22238905 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:18:20 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:18:20 EDT Re: lte http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22239218 decifal :
said by Big Dawg 23 See Profile :

IF you think that was long go to T-Mo and AT&T who have customers who have yet to see 3G and it may be next before they do.
yeah, that kills me.. Especially sense their bigger selling products such as the Iphone needs 3g or better to function.. Heh, why would I want to pay the extra cash for something thats not even usable in my city?.. I just don't get these company's.. There are places that have no options, and quite a few potential custoemrs if they service first.. But they pass on it... Unprofitable? My tailbone]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22239218 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:41:38 EDT Re: lte http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22238905 Big Dawg 23 : IF you think that was long go to T-Mo and AT&T who have customers who have yet to see 3G and it may be next before they do. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22238905 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:17:52 EDT lte http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233466 decifal : So what is going to be the cap/control on this service? These days, with companys they take out any excitement with some sorta greed control placement...

Not to mention lol.. It took verizon until late last year to get evdo in my county Dickson, TN.. So i'm sure we are last on their to do list.. Though strangely, ATT is deploying Uverse here like its going outta style....I still see Vrads going up to this day.. Even thought I thought they were haulting for the rest of the year...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233466 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:32:18 EDT