<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: lets charge overages for digital cable&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22241015</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:03:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:03:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: lets charge overages for digital cable</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22242195</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/611909" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=611909');">patcat88</a>:</small><br><br>Why don't we put GB caps on the amount of Digital Cable/Mpeg2 transport stream you can watch per month? HD will eat your bucket faster unless you watch an "economy HD" stream (most are anyways right now :D).<br><br>The cable boxes already record and send back ever remote press you do and what you watch to headquarters for data mining. Charging digital cable by the GB would be as easy as pie. $1 a GB, which is about 45 mins of SDTV.<br> </div> that is my idea i going to sue you]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22242195</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:10:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lets charge overages for digital cable</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22241833</link>
<description><![CDATA[S_engineer posted : hey, this is applicable to another front page story....<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap WIDTH=33%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22241833?c=1419740&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjI0MjE5NS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="9043 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=150 HEIGHT=225 SRC="/r0/download/1419740~d24bd83595d4042130824556a559380f/mn.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22241833</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:05:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>lets charge overages for digital cable</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22241015</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : Why don't we put GB caps on the amount of Digital Cable/Mpeg2 transport stream you can watch per month? HD will eat your bucket faster unless you watch an "economy HD" stream (most are anyways right now :D).<br><br>The cable boxes already record and send back ever remote press you do and what you watch to headquarters for data mining. Charging digital cable by the GB would be as easy as pie. $1 a GB, which is about 45 mins of SDTV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/lets-charge-overages-for-digital-cable-22241015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

