Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
1 edit | reply to STN
Re: Help/Advice with my Line Statistics please
WayJac already provided related information in the present thread, actually:
»Re: Help/Advice with my Line Statistics please |
|
Mauricio
aka CigaR
Premium
join:2008-12-06
1 edit | reply to wayjac
I did not know that. Kudos !
If only I knew where my SpeedStream 5242 is... |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
1 edit | Hi Mauricio,
Would you mind if i asked you about documenting how you
made 'RouterStats' work with your 2Wire by showing us the
step-by-step procedure illustrated with a few images taken
by Windows (PrntScrn, Cut'n'Paste into 'MSPaint') or else?
I think this DSL customer here could use a hand, it seems:
»New teksavvy customer slow download speed???
This thread has already reached its 4th page and yet it's
begining to feel like a bad dream to me - in slow motion!...
 |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
2 edits | The important thing that I ntoiced with the version 4.25 2wire firmware was to make sure that I used the numbers provided in the main interface. Any attempt to use any data from the advanced MDC pages resulted in failure (couldn't get past the log in). The numbers from the main menus and the j45 page should work with routerstats. |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Hi DSLRocker,
For me the 2Wire "J45" page is only a text file about 80 Kilo-Bytes
in size so i'm not sure how 'RouterStats' is supposed to parse that
as i only have samples: i don't own a 2Wire myself!
In your opinion, can noise curves be collected at all, nonetheless?
 |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
| said by Bicephale  :Hi DSLRocker, For me the 2Wire "J45" page is only a text file about 80 Kilo-Bytes in size so i'm not sure how 'RouterStats' is supposed to parse that as i only have samples: i don't own a 2Wire myself! In your opinion, can noise curves be collected at all, nonetheless? Yes, noise curves can be collected. I think there's 2 ways to do it. From what I remember:
you can use the "detailed statistics" page in the main interface. From there, you could just use the total amount in each of corrected and uncorrected errors and tell Routerstats to graph the change since the last interval.
I believe that J45 can be used by always using the last possible value in each category. Since the last value is the most recent, you shoudl be able to highlight that and tell Routersats to use that number. The 2wire modem moves the values in the J45 up one notch after each interval (5 minutes for some item, 15 minutes for others I think). |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| This is what i found:
In-depth analysis of line stats, Mauricio, 2009-Oct-19
It should work but i'm still searching for clues... |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| %20.GIF "93417 bytes")
Mauricio - 2Wire XSLT Page B04 3rd Column (2009-Oct-19) |
I think i found it but i can't confirm positively by myself. |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| It seems we've been throught this before, DSLRocker:
%20.GIF)
Help/Advice with my Line Statistics please, Bicephale, 2009-Jul-8
Help/Advice with my Line Statistics please, Bicephale, 2009-Jul-7
Right here in the present thread... I guess tomorow
i won't even remember where i've put my shoes!...
 |
|
Mauricio
aka CigaR
Premium
join:2008-12-06
| reply to Bicephale
said by Bicephale :Hi Mauricio, Would you mind if i asked you about documenting how you made 'RouterStats' work with your 2Wire by showing us the step-by-step procedure illustrated with a few images taken by Windows (PrntScrn, Cut'n'Paste into 'MSPaint') or else? I think this DSL customer here could use a hand, it seems: » New teksavvy customer slow download speed???This thread has already reached its 4th page and yet it's begining to feel like a bad dream to me - in slow motion!... Hahah ! I will try to put something together tomorrow.  |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
| reply to dslrocker3
an all time high signal to noise ratio margin at 6016Kbps for me.  It went up by between 1 to 1.5dB and I didn't have to do anything for it!
Oinktastic, ready to throw something at me yet? |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24 | Poor Oinktastic, i'm afraid he's already overwhelmed as it is!...
 |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
1 edit | said by Bicephale :Poor Oinktastic, i'm afraid he's already overwhelmed as it is!... yup, my increase in noise margin from 25 to 26.5dB might just be enough to push him over the edge and cause him to go ballistic!!!! LOL |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24 | Euh... Oinktastic going ballistic?!...
My brain will need a fair amount of sugar just to picture that!!!
 |
|
wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy | reply to dslrocker3
What's the top max sync rate so far |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
2 edits | I'm never seen higher than 10938 Kbps downstream on this line. However, I'm ceratin that my line is capable of more than 20Mbps on ADSL2+. We can't really go by the Kbps numbers that DMT 7.35 provides because the Speedtouch 516 doesn't actually record an attainable rate result. It only keeps track of RCO and DMT 7.35 then calculates an approximation meaing that there is rounding off involved. I know that the attainable rates are actually calculated by the computer software because DMT 7.35 and OrbMt both shows 1025Kbps for the upstream but STMT shows 1026Kbps. |
|
wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy
·AT&T Midwest
| said by dslrocker3 :I'm never seen higher than 10938 Kbps downstream on this line. However, I'm ceratin that my line is capable of more than 20Mbps on ADSL2+. If your current max sync rate is short of 12000kbps now
I don't think it would be higher than 20000kbps using adsl2+ |
|
Oinktastic
join:2005-08-24
Scarborough
·TekSavvy Solutions..
 ·3 Web
2 edits | reply to dslrocker3
said by dslrocker3 :said by Bicephale :Poor Oinktastic, i'm afraid he's already overwhelmed as it is!... yup, my increase in noise margin from 25 to 26.5dB might just be enough to push him over the edge and cause him to go ballistic!!!! LOL I won't go ballistic  However, it does just look a little bit too tantalizing
 |
|
Bicephale
join:2005-09-24 | We'll do our best to accomodate you, promissed!
 |
|
dslrocker3
join:2002-05-26
Toronto
| reply to dslrocker3
Today's little small contrilbuation/discussion about my line...
On previous occassions I had tried double filtering and stated that I found that double filtering only seemed to make a louder noise on my voice line. What just struck me was that I believe that I had not yet removed the ground wire in the basement that had no carbon attached to the other end. So perhaps the louder humming sound on the voice line with 2 filters was only caused by the incorrect ground
For absolutely no reason today, I decided to play with the amount of filters int he basement that filter out the voice line from the modem's wiring. With 1 filter, I here a very small amount of hiss in one particular phone in my house. With 2 filters, the hiss is completely gone and only a very slight "electronic noise" sound in the background that you only hear if you are listenning very, very closely. So I went ahead and tried triple filtering.
Attaching 3 filters actually make the voice line more noisy (still no hiss but more of an electronic noise sound came through). Hopefully, people understand when I say an "electronic noise sound" (a very faint background noise that almost just sounds like electricity - if you could actually hear it which you can't really).
I then tried playing with swapping filters around just to make sure there wasn't something fishy going on with any one of them. It didn't matter which ones I used in the end and the results were the same.
one filter=slight hiss on one on my voice phones, slight electronic background nioise
two filter=zero hiss, pratically zero electronic background noise
3 filters=still zero hiss but electonic background noise amount returned to about the same level as only using one filter |
|
