Re: hmm in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22261460 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:19:57 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:19:57 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261770 Matt :
said by Darth Fiber See Profile :

It wasn't the same Cablevision. The Cablevision from New York only had a system in Ohio for a while, because one of the Dolans lives out there.

Lightpath isn't limited to certain markets, they do have a statewide francise in New Jersey. The only limit is how close the customer is to their fiber.
Weird, it was the same logo.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261770 Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:42:35 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261460 Darth Fiber : It wasn't the same Cablevision. The Cablevision from New York only had a system in Ohio for a while, because one of the Dolans lives out there.

Lightpath isn't limited to certain markets, they do have a statewide francise in New Jersey. The only limit is how close the customer is to their fiber.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22261460 Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:20:16 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253833 acs12798 : I think that is a flawed analysis. Cablevision has an easier time deploying because they are literally in the best cable market possible. Its dense continuous suburbs(dense enough that a lot of people I meet at school who are not from major cities consider it urban) but single family housing at the same time. Easy to deploy, and the areas almost uniformly wealthy.

Anyway, I have to disagree with the initial comment in this thread anyway. I agree that Cablevision isn't a bad cable internet provider. They are terrible with TV IMO. They are as slow if not slower than the big guys in deploying HD, and they cram 4 HD channels in one QAM. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22253833 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:02:44 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22252063 PhoenixDown : Cablevision also owns Lightpath, a CLEC who - in limited markets - runs fiber to the prem for businesses.

I think it would be easier for Cablevision switch over to a 100% fiber network when the time comes.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22252063 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:34:34 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251770 Matt :
said by OOL Tech1234 :

YuP! Definitely Cablevision isn't the bad cable provider. They offer great speeds, a good rate and alots to offer. If only Cablevision were to expand, they would definitely steal all of TWC and Comcast customers :) One can only hope.
Cablevision was bought out in most areas. We used to be Cablevision back in the mid-late 80's here. Time Warner bought them.

What I think is interesting, is the belief that it's easier to deploy to a smaller geographic area. Cablevision could be considered proof of that.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251770 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:42:17 EDT Re: hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251602 anon : YuP! Definitely Cablevision isn't the bad cable provider. They offer great speeds, a good rate and alots to offer. If only Cablevision were to expand, they would definitely steal all of TWC and Comcast customers :) One can only hope.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251602 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:05:35 EDT hmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251581 majortom1029 : IT depends on which cable company. Isnt cablevision spending something like only 300 million to deploy docsis 3 and wifi?

Sorry got the figure wrong.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22251581 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:00:06 EDT