Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Times: Deployment Costs Sink As Prices Rise » Question
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« The Times got its numbers wrong.  
AuthorAll Replies


Unkown User

@covad.net

reply to rdmiller
Re: Question

Metered billing done correctly probably wouldn't be so bad. You should have a very low connection fee, then base everything else on a reasonable price per GB. That way, grannies and technologically impaired people could have a much smaller bill than what they are currently paying, and only those who really download extreme amounts would be paying extreme amounts.

Of course, all the terms used are relative. Reasonable on a consumer basis and reasonable to the Cable Co. are going to be two different numbers.

The problem is, that a lot of users would be charged less than what they are paying now for their current usage under a true metered scheme, while probably not enough users would be charged more to make up for that. Which irks the Cable co's profits.

Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

said by Unkown User :

Metered billing done correctly probably wouldn't be so bad. You should have a very low connection fee, then base everything else on a reasonable price per GB. That way, grannies and technologically impaired people could have a much smaller bill than what they are currently paying, and only those who really download extreme amounts would be paying extreme amounts.
TWC isn't interested in true metered billing because they want to soak those grannies and technologically impaired people too. Asking a cable company to bill internet at no more than $10/month and $0.25 a GB is like asking them to offer al a carte.


vzw emp

@qwest.net

Let's make one thing clear: Neither Time Warner, AT&T or any other company planning on charging by the byte is lacking either capacity or profits. The capacity issues are nullified by technology and smart management, the profit issues is nullified by their 10k's (annual reports). Time Warner is making money hand over fist, and AT&T even more so.

When I see accurate, complete information from TW or AT&T which support their claims I'll gladly agree to their demands. These people have ulterior motives for moving to this billing method, and it has absolutely nothing to do with helping their customers.
-
Forums » Times: Deployment Costs Sink As Prices Rise« The Times got its numbers wrong.  


Sunday, 29-Nov 13:51:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [76] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Samsung LCD TV No Picture but has Sound [Electronics]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [ PVP] Druid pvp where to start? [World of Warcraft]