| reply to S_engineer
Re: Question said by S_engineer:Now if everyone decides to pay the extra fee, just how does that relieve the traffic? The extra fees underwrite the cost of adding more infrastructure.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
dforan
join:2000-12-09
Willoughby, OH | Why is my neighbor hood still have 30 yearold plus infrastructure.. Cause we takes you money and run..
BUNK |
|
dforan
join:2000-12-09
Willoughby, OH Reviews:
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
BUNK
My neighbor hood infrastructure is 30 plus years old
All they EVERY did was raise rate and then take the money and RUN... Right AT&T oh I forgot they took the money and laid every one off then sold out to Comcast and then went to Road Runner and no improvments
redefines SUX |
|
|
|
donh
join:2006-11-27
Jackson, WY | reply to fAcEtIOUs
They have been charging for expansion and maintenance all along. But instead of investing in the future and maintenance they have used it as dividends and bonuses. Now they expect us to pay for it again. Its the americun thing to do. Get em coming, get em going and kick them on the way down. And of course they were able to right off all the fake investment on there taxes.
What a great system we have. Fake competition, fake taxes and fake investments with real greed.
Don |
|
wentlancYou Can't Fix Dumb..
join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH | reply to fAcEtIOUs
If general usage on the internet is increasing, then they need to collect those fees from every user. Raise your prices for all users.
How much of that usage increase is due to faster speeds being offered by the very same ISP's?
How much of that usage increase has something to do with these ISP's marketing that you can download more faster with their service??
They are begging for the traffic, but complaining when they get it. Nice plan.
cw |
|
| reply to donh
said by donh: But instead of investing in the future and maintenance they have used it as dividends and bonuses. Sorry, but your claim is wrong. All the major players(Comcast, TWC, Verizon, AT&T, etc) spend billions every year on maintenance and upgrades. Just go to the SEC filings to see their annual reports on how much they spend.
I, like many other stockholders, think executive pay and bonuses are way too high. And there are movements afoot to rein in those costs. But as high as they are, they are a drop in the bucket compared to other company costs(like maintenance and capital costs for infrastructure growth).
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:said by S_engineer:Now if everyone decides to pay the extra fee, just how does that relieve the traffic? The extra fees underwrite the cost of adding more infrastructure. Except that they take the money and do not upgrade the infrastructure.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:I, like many other stockholders, Explains your Comcastic attitude.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries. |
|
| said by sturmvogel:said by fAcEtIOUs:I, like many other stockholders, Explains your Comcastic attitude. Does it? I, like many others, invest in MANY, MANY companies. These companies even create jobs. Maybe even one you may someday have.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
 DarkLogixPremium
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:3 | reply to wentlanc
that would be great but last study I looked at showed internet traffic leveling off not the exponential increase that they claim
what Comcast and all cable ISPs need to do is run RG-11 rated to 3GHz to every one then their RF infrastructure would be as near perfect as possible and it would have the side effect of people seen doing something as oposed to doing stuff behind the scenes that although more needed is so quiet that people think nothing is happening
every once in awhile you need people to see your people doing something and at the same time any amps could be checked over completely, grounding blocks checked to meet spec |
|
 espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
 ·Clear Wireless
| reply to sturmvogel
said by sturmvogel:Except that they take the money and do not upgrade the infrastructure. How do you explain the well documented DOCSIS 3.0 rollout if they "do not upgrade the infrastructure" ? |
|
espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
| reply to DarkLogix
said by DarkLogix:that would be great but last study I looked at showed internet traffic leveling off not the exponential increase that they claim The growth rate is leveling off to around 50-60%, but traffic is ever increasing..
See: »www.dtc.umn.edu/mints/home.php |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:said by sturmvogel:said by fAcEtIOUs:I, like many other stockholders, Explains your Comcastic attitude. Does it? I, like many others, invest in MANY, MANY companies. These companies even create jobs. Maybe even one you may someday have. Doubtfull, I have an ethics standard regarding who I work for.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries. |
|
1 edit | reply to espaeth
said by espaeth:said by sturmvogel:Except that they take the money and do not upgrade the infrastructure. How do you explain the well documented DOCSIS 3.0 rollout if they "do not upgrade the infrastructure" ? The real big issue with infrastructure is the cable. Docsis 3 is just a bandaid to cram more into the same obsolete cable system. A true upgrade would be to have real fiber connections to their customers, as FiOS does. That would be a true upgrade that would warrant all that talk about investing in infrastructure.
The much hyped Docsis 3 upgrade shows its worth in the fact that the same 250 GB cap remains regarding of the upgrade status.
--
Obama '08. Will help resolve the terrible broadband issues we have that put us so far behind other countries. |
|
| reply to sturmvogel
said by sturmvogel:Doubtfull, I have an ethics standard regarding who I work for. You may still work for a company I invest in.
»/r0/download/1···ocks.txt
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| Unfortunately, I do. |
|
DarkLogixPremium
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:3 | reply to espaeth
thats still not the exponintial growth that they claim |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:said by S_engineer:Now if everyone decides to pay the extra fee, just how does that relieve the traffic? The extra fees underwrite the cost of adding more infrastructure. thats the problem. it NEVER goes into improvements, just the FATCATS pockets!
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee |
|
