republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: System modifies same ATSC signal as regular OTA digital TV

Each TV market that chooses this really needs an additional channel (shared by broadcasters) with distributed transmission to solve the bandwidth and other problems.

recneps
Premium
join:2006-06-24
Whitby, ON
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL

Good idea.
A single transmitter could provide 20 channels of 1mbps each.
As you're only operating one transmitter, you can also just crank up the power and serve a very large area.
Some of the ATSC stations in Toronto are only a couple kilowatts of power (compared to the megawatt analog stations that they had)
So imagine a full megawatt ATSC transmitter's range..


Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

1 edit

said by recneps:

A single transmitter could provide 20 channels of 1mbps each.
As you're only operating one transmitter, you can also just crank up the power and serve a very large area.
Some of the ATSC stations in Toronto are only a couple kilowatts of power (compared to the megawatt analog stations that they had)
So imagine a full megawatt ATSC transmitter's range..
Because there would be some overhead I doubt that 20 Mpeg-4 subchannels would be practical but a half dozen broadcasters with a subchannel or two each would probably work out. Also MPH is very well designed for distributed transmission (multiple low power transmitters) and could probably cover an area better than with a single large transmitter. MPH should also have fewer receptions problems than regular ATSC.

Thursday, 31-May 19:19:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics