site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
388
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


maartena
Elmo
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DIRECTV

1 edit

TWC just doesn't get it.

If they had implemented a soft cap like Comcast did with 250 Gb, they would not have had all the bad media attention. And now they are going to pout that because we, the customers, stood up against caps, they aren't going to roll out DOCSIS 3.0?

I am pretty satisfied with TWC overall, my internet seems to always work and I barely have any problems with my TV....

But this is just rediculous. TWC is one of those companies that just doesn't get that in order to retain clients, you need to invest in your network.

Adelphia was ran into the ground by incompetent management, and I surely hope TWC isn't going the same way.

And quite frankly? What good is a 100 Mbps DOCSIS 3.0 connection anyways if you can't download more then 3 HD movies per month with it?

Also: I have set myself a budget of roughly $50 to $60 per month for internet. I am not going to pay $99 for 50/5 unless I win the lottery.

--
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

yah they'd still get the bull shit from the media and the public. Why? They're not a phone company. ATT has the cap at 20gigs and They're not in the main stream news. Why? They keep their name out only because they "help" keep terrorists at bay with the NSA.

Plus the 250gig cap isn't high enough for people on here didn't you see that before? they want unlimited full speed that their modems will go and QOS for $44 per month. After all its the American Dream and right now.



vzw emp

@qwest.net

reply to maartena

said by maartena:

And quite frankly? What good is a 100 Mbps DOCSIS 3.0 connection anyways if you can't download more then 3 HD movies per month with it?

Also: I have set myself a budget of roughly $50 to $60 per month for internet. I am not going to pay $99 for 50/5 unless I win the lottery.

What good is a 50Mbps download when the upload is only 10 percent of that? I could get a 15/1 "RR Turbo" connection right now but I choose to stick with the standard 7/512. Offer a 20/5 and we'll talk.

Pricewise, $99 is too much to pay for residential internet. No SLA, no deal.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

want an SLA? Go get a T1.


Thursday, 31-May 09:28:05 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics