<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Charter shouldn&#x27;t look for gov&#x27;t bailout either&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22288998</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:26:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:26:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Charter shouldn&#x27;t look for gov&#x27;t bailout either</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22292423</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : TWC will only take them if Charter has "key" markets. Most of Charter's markets are rural. <br><br>Comcast would be interested in some as well.<br><br>Would be a great time for ATT to expand cheap and fast.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22292423</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:56:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Charter shouldn&#x27;t look for gov&#x27;t bailout either</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22289057</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted : the only way to get worse is to have the "cap-happy" Time Warner take over Charter's systems.<br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22289057</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:01:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Charter shouldn&#x27;t look for gov&#x27;t bailout either</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22289041</link>
<description><![CDATA[AMDUSER posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>".. If the creditors force Charter thru a messy full court case bankruptcy instead of the pre-approved kind, look for Charter to go on the block. .."<br> </div>That would not be too surprising, if that happened it may end up at Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Time Warner Cable I'm sure is also intrested in some of Charters systems as well (eg. Long Beach,CA. with about 500,000 customers. ) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22289041</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:57:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Charter shouldn&#x27;t look for gov&#x27;t bailout either</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22288998</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : Unlike banks and auto companies, I don't see the Gov't bailing Charter out of its mess either. If the creditors force Charter thru a messy full court case bankruptcy instead of the pre-approved kind, look for Charter to go on the block. And if Comcast wins its case against the FCC in the Appeals Court that limit them to 30% of the cable TV market, you might see Comcast getting a nice chunk of Charter franchises.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Charter-shouldnt-look-for-govt-bailout-either-22288998</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:46:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

