There is a HUGE difference between what you just said in this last post and saying that NO ONE questioned the verdict.
Only if you think in terms of everything being black and white. Most people can infer meaning. I can't possible account for how everyone will read what I type.
"no one questioned it until the news was released that he wasn't impartial."
How can this be viewed as anything but a black and white statement? Take at look around the net at posts from the date that the PB verdict was released, there were tons of people questioning what was with the judge. This was well before the judge's association with **aa was news.
