Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Big Brother Probably Used Deep Packet Inspection » public shame...?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
65
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
But then again, Big Brother probably used lawnmowers, too... »
« Not more 1985  
AuthorAll Replies


tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ
·Cox HSI
·Callcentric
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·FrontierNet Intern..

public shame...?

While Congress frequently likes to talk about passing laws requiring that such systems be purely "opt in" for consumers, the collective lobbying muscle of both the telecom and marketing/advertising industries continually ensures this doesn't happen. In order to prevent such laws from passing, carriers like AT&T and Verizon are trying to push for a self-regulatory system whereby "public shame" would keep them honest about privacy violations.
"public shame" only works for those who have souls. should read:

self-regulatory system whereby "public shame" subscriber loss and lower shareholder returns would keep them honest about privacy violations.
q.
--
those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it...

DarkLogix

join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
ya those soulless Lobbiest


swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to tubbynet
The only reason any industry ever tries to offer "self-regulation" is to preserve the power to do what the legislators propose to forbid.

The argument that a law is "unnecessary" because the proposed targets are supposedly going to behave is obviously illogical. If they aren't going to do X, then they won't be affected by a prohibition of X. If they object to a prohibition of X, it can only be because they want to do X.

BTW, the likes of Phorm and Nebu-ad - which offer ISPs a share of profits if the ISPs let the companies spy on the ISP's customers and sell targeted advertising - these companies' business model features not only wiretapping, but forgery as well - they actually tamper with data on its way to or from the web users.

Making such conduct subject to fines is not enough - it should be a felony.
-
Forums » Big Brother Probably Used Deep Packet InspectionBut then again, Big Brother probably used lawnmowers, too... »
« Not more 1985  


Saturday, 05-Dec 15:50:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [127] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [99] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· An Excellent Guide About Google Voice And Sip Sorcery [VOIP Tech Chat]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]