<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22289665</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:40:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:40:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22298053</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Just out of curiosity, which companies have you worked for? I have been in business over 15 years, and I have yet to see a company with profit margins in the 1000's of % over cost. Think about it, if a car costs $15k, then you are saying that the 'physical cost' would only be in the $1500 range? I don't think so. I have worked in the automotive support industry.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22298053</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:33:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22297583</link>
<description><![CDATA[jadebangle posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/639703" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=639703');">wwdubbia</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1338286" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1338286');">DGLewis</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/373609" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=373609');">espaeth</a>:</small><br><br>The 10K balance sheet only shows direct costs (power, hardware, maintenance, vendor fees) and not indirect costs like operating the service vehicle fleet, developing tech training programs, paying employee salaries + benefits, call center operation costs, etc. </div>And those indirect costs scale not with traffic, but with number of customers.  The number of trucks, technicians, and call center workers you need doesn't change whether your customers are using 10 GB/month, 100 GB/month, or 1000 GB/month.<br> </div>and it would be safe to assume that these costs would go down due to the caps.  e.g. less customers = lesser need for technicians/truck rolls<br> </div>Cost has gone down but our usage has not :)<br>The more we use the less it cost<br>on the other hand, the less we use the more it cost<br>buy more, pay less! lol<br><br>buy large quantity save money!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22297583</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:16:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22295636</link>
<description><![CDATA[raybrett posted : Odd - my calculator keeps coming up with $10 billion for 200,000 x $50,000.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22295636</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:58:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22293257</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : If we went by how much a person used on realistic terms, most people would be paying less for service.<br><br>Can't have that now can they?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22293257</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:07:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22293013</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : Actually ALL the tiers should be $10+usage just like the electric company does[base charge plus what you use]<br><small>--<br>When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22293013</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:44:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22292154</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : The, its about the shareholders is as valid as the need to charge more for the same service. The shareholders are not getting anymore of anything. The stock prices are deflating faster than a vanishing clown act, and anyone invested in the great shareholder wall street fiasco know that real well. Its about the fat cat execs at the top of these companys who are getting rich at every ones expense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22292154</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:43:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291626</link>
<description><![CDATA[birdfeedr posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>How about gasoline prices?<br>How about the cost of electricity in Calif a few years ago?<br> </div>Oil fluctuations are globally and politically influenced.<br><br>Calif. electricity was result of Enron's criminal behavior (fueled by greed).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291626</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:23:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291181</link>
<description><![CDATA[S_engineer posted : Would you be in favor of taxation on a per GB basis. That  would be the next step in the evolution of billing for broadband services!<br>You may think it's far fetched, but 2 years ago so was the idea of metered billing.<br>This is a consumer fight that has broad implications. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291181</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:57:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291071</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/731512" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=731512');">jjeffeory</a>:</small><br><br>$3 BILLION??? Sounds freaking fantastic to me.<br> </div>The percentage is the relevant number, not the amount.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291071</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:35:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291055</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : $3 BILLION??? Sounds freaking fantastic to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291055</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:33:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291023</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : This seems to be getting too complicated. Too many tiers for the average consumer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291023</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:28:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291022</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by RR User :</small><br><br> How would you feel about paying 3-4x more on your electric, gas or water bill? Or what about paying 3-4 times more for that car you just bought. What about having your mortgage or your food bill quadruple? <br><br><b><u>You never see increases that dramatic on any other common service, so why should we see it on broadband?</u></b><br> </div>How about gasoline prices?<br>How about the cost of electricity in Calif a few years ago?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291022</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:28:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291002</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/201506" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=201506');">Skippy25</a>:</small><br><br> And you don't just want profit, you want it here and now and will sacrifice tomorrow to make a buck today.<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Not true. Most investors want to maximize profits over a period of time. They don't look for an immediate return at the expense of steady long term returns.<hr></blockquote><br> Worse comes to worse, you just pull your money out of one company and shove it in another as you can care less where you make your money<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>And you would leave your hard earned money in a company that never turns a profit, purely out of altruism for the employees & society? Don't make me laugh!! <hr></blockquote><br> </div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22291002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290994</link>
<description><![CDATA[rawgerz posted : TW is a public company, so they will like many others look for any way to increase their earnings. It's all about the shareholders.<br><small>--<br><i><br>You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290994</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:24:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290951</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I would have no problem paying $5 or $10 more a month considering I use more than most average users. Given how cheap bandwidth is, that $5-10 would not only easy cover my fair share of bandwidth usage but also net TW some profit towards upgrades.<br><br>I think most other people who also get a lot of benefit out of their broadband connection would be willing to pay a little bit more, like I do. But suddenly penalizing people with overages that could easily top out at $150, which is 3-4x more than we already pay is ridiculous. How ridiculous exactly? How would you feel about paying 3-4x more on your electric, gas or water bill? Or what about paying 3-4 times more for that car you just bought. What about having your mortgage or your food bill quadruple? You never see increases that dramatic on any other common service, so why should we see it on broadband?<br><br>People complain when their cable bill goes up 3-5% with a rate hike, but people eat the cost and move on. This should be no different, since I have never had a 300-400% rate hike on my cable bill before, broadband should follow the same rules.<br><br>I'm not against TW making a profit, or trying to figure out a way to pay for DOCSIS 3 upgrades, but they surely should have found a more acceptable way to do it. I personally would like to see them re-brand their Turbo tier as their unlimited/250GB super tier and keep it about the same price, while all lower tiers may have a usage-based type billing model. It would give users in non-competitive area's some choice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290951</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:15:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290817</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbo2150 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>That is exactly right and why I am so infuriated by this entire fiasco. Time Warner is rolling this trial out in markets with little to no competition. Why aren't they rolling this out in their competitive markets where they face FiOS? Isn't THAT where they should upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0?</div>And the low caps to go with it. Will it really be usable for anything other than email? Personally, I am not sure what TW is actually thinking to begin with.<br><small>--<br><br> - "Techie" Jim</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290817</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290762</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm not a "large  bandwidth company", just an average guy that hosts some web content and a few websites, and I buy bandwidth in 1TB chunks, at the rate of 2-3 cents per gigabyte. And that's NOT cogent bandwidth, It's Level3 bandwidth. And I have no problem paying for the bandwidth as I use it, since I know it's provided to me at a reasonable cost.<br><br>While it may not be easy to pin down the exact cost of bandwidth, it's quite obvious it's a relatively cheap, and plentiful resource, which naturally makes it a perfect resource for cable companies to mislead customers into thinking it's "scarce and expensive".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290762</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290686</link>
<description><![CDATA[S_engineer posted : hey TK...would you then mind or be in favor of the gov't taxing the user on a per GB basis?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290686</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:27:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290601</link>
<description><![CDATA[espaeth posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1338286" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1338286');">DGLewis</a>:</small><br><br>And those indirect costs scale not with traffic, but with number of customers.  The number of trucks, technicians, and call center workers you need doesn't change whether your customers are using 10 GB/month, 100 GB/month, or 1000 GB/month.</div>I didn't say they were related to traffic consumption.  I simply stated that you can't directly relate the direct costs of Data Services on a 10-K statement to revenue because it doesn't account for the most expensive parts of providing the service: the humans involved in the operation of the services, taxes, interest on outstanding debt, and other overhead.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290601</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:10:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290552</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skippy25 posted : I would simply define it by looking at other industries that actually <b>have true</b> competition.<br><br>How much do HP / Dell / IBM make on their PC business?<br>What about simple hardware vendors like Mwave and Newegg?<br>Amazon and OneCall?<br>How about your local grocery stores? <br>How about your local fast food restaurants?<br><br>The problem is you have a company that is a monopoly in many areas and a (cooperative) duopoloy at best in others. Stating that if customers are willing to pay it then they are golden is neither right (morally) or collectively for the consumer base because they truly have no choice.<br><br>The number one problem for corporations are investors (like yourself) that don't care about anything except profit. And you don't just want profit, you want it here and now and will sacrifice tomorrow to make a buck today. Worse comes to worse, you just pull your money out of one company and shove it in another as you can care less where you make your money, you just want to make it. Be damned with the company and/or society - give me profit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290552</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:00:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290538</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br>Now lets factor it competition into your equation. No/little competition means there is little/nothing to offset that excessive price.</div>That is exactly right and why I am so infuriated by this entire fiasco. Time Warner is rolling this trial out in markets with little to no competition. Why aren't they rolling this out in their competitive markets where they face FiOS? Isn't THAT where they should upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290538</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:56:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290521</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>I think you'd be surprised to know that most companies have profit margins that are 1000's of percentage points higher than the physical cost.</div>And my entire point is... why? Why do they have to have an immediate return at the expense of their customers? What ever happen to long-term investments? And why is it seen as such a bad thing that a company not make a 1000+% profit margin when they could make a 100%. It may take a bit more time for a full return but it would most likely come.<br> </div>I don't mean on the value of their stock. The point of such a high profit margin is to allow for investment in expansion, to better the service, as a safety net for the unexpected. There are numerous reason that successful companies must have such a large profit margin and really require one to operate. Apple has what, a 600% profit margin on the iPhone by most estimates? (That's probably on the low side too.)<br><br>When you start talking about huge corporations like Time Warner, that percentage can shrink because that percentage of profit is simply a much larger sum of money. You see that in the executive compensation packages. CEO, CTO, CFO's all figured out if they can eek out 2 points on their stock value by cutting costs, they directly stand to benefit. It may not be much to the profit of the company, but it's still a huge sum of money to an individual. After all, what is $28 million if you had a net profit of $7 billion? That's only .4% of said net profit.<br><br>However, that $28 million could have upgraded half your market to DOCSIS 3.0. So a lot of what you see is the result of impatient stock holders who want an immediate return. They are not the majority of the smart investors out there however. They came to the forefront when the day trading phenomenon became prevalent. When you couple that with the greed of an executive, little to no competition, and no oversight by an impartial party, you get what we have now. Greed run rampant in the from of anti-consumer practices.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290521</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:53:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290516</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/373609" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=373609');">espaeth</a>:</small><br><br>The 10K balance sheet only shows direct costs (power, hardware, maintenance, vendor fees) and not indirect costs like operating the service vehicle fleet, developing tech training programs, paying employee salaries + benefits, call center operation costs, etc.<br> </div>None of which are affected by bandwidth utilization.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290516</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:53:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290508</link>
<description><![CDATA[wwdubbia posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1338286" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1338286');">DGLewis</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/373609" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=373609');">espaeth</a>:</small><br><br>The 10K balance sheet only shows direct costs (power, hardware, maintenance, vendor fees) and not indirect costs like operating the service vehicle fleet, developing tech training programs, paying employee salaries + benefits, call center operation costs, etc. </div>And those indirect costs scale not with traffic, but with number of customers.  The number of trucks, technicians, and call center workers you need doesn't change whether your customers are using 10 GB/month, 100 GB/month, or 1000 GB/month.<br> </div>and it would be safe to assume that these costs would go down due to the caps.  e.g. less customers = lesser need for technicians/truck rolls]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290508</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:51:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290479</link>
<description><![CDATA[DGLewis posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/373609" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=373609');">espaeth</a>:</small><br><br>The 10K balance sheet only shows direct costs (power, hardware, maintenance, vendor fees) and not indirect costs like operating the service vehicle fleet, developing tech training programs, paying employee salaries + benefits, call center operation costs, etc. </div>And those indirect costs scale not with traffic, but with number of customers.  The number of trucks, technicians, and call center workers you need doesn't change whether your customers are using 10 GB/month, 100 GB/month, or 1000 GB/month.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290479</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:45:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290475</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br>What about greed? $1/gb is not excessive greed? $0.20/text message is not excessive greed?<br></div>1. Text messaging isn't a requirement for cell phone/data <br>2. There are relatively cheap unlimited plans by every carrier.<br>3. You can have text messaging disabled<br><br>This is more like having a 10GB 1.5Mbps plan with overages, and having the option to upgrade to a 10Mbps plan with unlimited.  Of course, unlike text messaging - its the actual plan, while text messaging is an add on (I have mine disabled - waste of money, internet data is cheaper)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290475</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:43:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290467</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbo2150 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1578597" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1578597');">Metatron2008</a>:</small><br><br>Why would a margin 1000's of times be bad to the consumer if they are willing to pay it?</div>Now lets factor it competition into your equation. No/little competition means there is little/nothing to offset that excessive price. It means the consumer has little option besides pay it or drop the service (supposing they are not locked in a contact and have to pay early term fees).<br><br>The same companies charge excessive rates to allow others to use their network. Well out of the viable competitive range. THey constantly try to prevent competition and even a community's attempts to create competion (either through a local/private network, wireless, or other).<br><br>And in the end the consumer has no voice. Stinks to high heaven of greed to me.<br><small>--<br><br> - "Techie" Jim</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290467</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:42:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290464</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>And what exactly is greed?</div>Such an easy way to attempt to say nothing is greed. I can certainly ask the same question... what exactly is NOT greed? 800% pofit? 8000%?<br><br>So why is to SOOOOO bad to have a profit aimed at giving decent consumer products and make a decent return 5 years in vs. 0.5 years in? I don't know why so many companies seem to think that if they are not making an immediate return, it should not be done or it is the wrong way to go. When did instant gratification become part of business?<br><br>Edit: Also, what about COMPETITION?? They do everything to keep it out and in the Internet business there seems to be very little in most places in the U.S. (with exception to very large metro areas).<br> </div>I think TK was implying that greed means differently to alot of people.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290464</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:41:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290436</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>I think you'd be surprised to know that most companies have profit margins that are 1000's of percentage points higher than the physical cost.</div>And my entire point is... why? Why do they have to have an immediate return at the expense of their customers? What ever happen to long-term investments? And why is it seen as such a bad thing that a company not make a 1000+% profit margin when they could make a 100%. It may take a bit more time for a full return but it would most likely come.<br> </div>Why would a margin 1000's of times be bad to the consumer if they are willing to pay it?<br><br>That's just making money.  If the customer refuses, making them pay it is monopolistic greed.<br><br>But hey, if the customer wants to pay it, why stop them?<br><br>In all honesty, their is a large difference between keeping the customer happy, and letting them have a choice, versus being a hippy who wants to share the wealth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290436</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:36:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290431</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmn1207 posted : Impatient, short-sighted investors are the culprits behind some of the lousy business decisions we see all the time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290431</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:35:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290430</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1381016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1381016');">Lazlow</a>:</small><br><br>It is from TWC's 10K, usually pages 60 and 89.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/drawFiling.asp?docKey=136-000095014409001480-7KMA0M6H08G4QA5OOIQS9227UK&docFormat=HTM&formType=10-K" >investing.businessweek.com/resea&middot;&middot;&middot;ype=10-K</A><br> </div>And if you look at the overall revenues - costs(excluding a one time charge of $14.8 billion, their profits are not overly high.<br>Their revenues for TWC were approx $17 billion and the costs were $14 billion. <b>So they made $3 billion on $17 billion in revenue.</b> A 17.6% return.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290430</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:35:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290400</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbo2150 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>I think you'd be surprised to know that most companies have profit margins that are 1000's of percentage points higher than the physical cost.</div>And my entire point is... why? Why do they have to have an immediate return at the expense of their customers? What ever happen to long-term investments? And why is it seen as such a bad thing that a company not make a 1000+% profit margin when they could make a 100%. It may take a bit more time for a full return but it would most likely come.<br><small>--<br><br> - "Techie" Jim</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290400</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:29:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290394</link>
<description><![CDATA[S_engineer posted : I think theres a certain trap that people are falling into, and that's your view falls into one extreme or another. This is the same polarization that is paralyzing Washington DC. <br>Everyone has the right to a profit. And what one person sees as greed another sees as profit. But here you have a case where a company tries to make drastic detrimental changes to service of the consumer for no reason other than more profit. Then they insult the consumer by implying they're ignorant. On top of that, they then tell you your not worth upgrading. This is consumer rape! <br><br>There is a discussion that should have happened a long time ago. A sort of stress test for broadband providers. That is what happens when broadband reaches saturation point?<br>How would the already oversold services hold up to the expanding web with expanding content. This is nothing new, we were having these discussions years ago. So to me, the basic argument is that are we going to let the already profitable mega carriers extort more money from the consumer because they see an even more profitable business model.<br><small>--<br>"When I was in junior high school, the teachers voted me the student most likely to end up in the electric chair."---Sylvestor Stallone</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290394</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:28:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290382</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbo2150 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>And what exactly is greed?</div>Such an easy way to attempt to say nothing is greed. I can certainly ask the same question... what exactly is NOT greed? 800% pofit? 8000%?<br><br>So why is to SOOOOO bad to have a profit aimed at giving decent consumer products and make a decent return 5 years in vs. 0.5 years in? I don't know why so many companies seem to think that if they are not making an immediate return, it should not be done or it is the wrong way to go. When did instant gratification become part of business?<br><br>Edit: Also, what about COMPETITION?? They do everything to keep it out and in the Internet business there seems to be very little in most places in the U.S. (with exception to very large metro areas).<br><small>--<br><br> - "Techie" Jim</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290382</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:26:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290343</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lazlow posted : It is from TWC's 10K, usually pages 60 and 89.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/drawFiling.asp?docKey=136-000095014409001480-7KMA0M6H08G4QA5OOIQS9227UK&docFormat=HTM&formType=10-K" >investing.businessweek.com/resea&middot;&middot;&middot;ype=10-K</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290343</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:19:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290339</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : Lazlow, can you please provide the link to where you are getting your numbers? Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290339</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:18:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290330</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lazlow posted : Lets flip this around a little bit. Lets compare the video numbers. Cost of Video Revenues $3.75Billion, Video Revenues $10.5 Billion. Now keeping Espaeth point in mind we will add the same $.85 Billion we did for HSI.<br><br>3.75+.85= 4.6<br><br>(10.5-4.6)/4.6=128%(profit)<br><br>So I think disparity in percent profit shows that it is about how much they can convince the user to pay versus what it costs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290330</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:17:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290305</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1381016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1381016');">Lazlow</a>:</small><br><br>Tk<br><br>Lets say, for the sake of argument, that Espaeth has a point and we move the total HSI revenue cost from $146 million to an even $1 Billion, which should cover ANY imagined costs. You are still making over four times as much as your costs. I do not hold it against any company to make an honest profit, but can you really say that anything over 100% profit is honest? ($4.159 - $1)/$1=316%(profit)<br> </div>Most companies that I have worked for would consider a profit that is 4 times documented costs as a pretty terrible margin. You simply can't expand with that kind of limited revenue flow and the subsequent cash reserves it would allow for.<br><br>I think you'd be surprised to know that most companies have profit margins that are 1000's of percentage points higher than the physical cost.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290305</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:13:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290282</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/121095" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=121095');">RARPSL</a>:</small><br><br>You are confusing the speed that the user can move data with the volume of data that they can move. A higher speed tier has nothing to do with how much data you can move - Only how long it will take you to move it. Unless you want to move more data then a slow tier can handle if used 24/7, all switching to a faster tier does is decrease the amount of time it takes to move the same amount of data. <br> </div>I don't see that I am confusing anything. <br><br>If the "Granny Tier" is 768Kbps but I want the ability to say, stream Netflix. I should have the option of upgrading to the "Granny Xtreme Tier!" which has say, a 1.5Mbps limit. I am obviously paying extra for the convenience of being able to move more bits per second, so there should be an extra charge associated with that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290282</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:10:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290263</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>There is if you try to do it in a dishonest way that is extremely anti-consumer.</div>This is exactly the kind of poor thinking of companies and those who support it today. ONLY being dishonest is anti-consumer? Falsifying data (which is what most are doing now) to support their own agenda is not dishonest? What about greed? $1/gb is not excessive greed? $0.20/text message is not excessive greed?<br></div>I think everything you mention would fall under the umbrella of "dishonest." I also mention several times in my posts that their plan penalizes their existing customers, I think that covers greed too.<br><br>Also, I'm not sure I like the implied insult that I am somehow pro-Time Warner or pro any corporation. I most definitely fall onto the pro-consumer side of things, but I'm not naive enough to fall so far to the pro-consumer side that I can't see and understand both sides.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290263</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:07:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290182</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : I agree with you Jerm.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290182</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:51:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290149</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1381016" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1381016');">Lazlow</a>:</small><br><br>Tk<br><br>Lets say, for the sake of argument, that Espaeth has a point and we move the total HSI revenue cost from $146 million to an even $1 Billion, which should cover ANY imagined costs. You are still making over four times as much as your costs. I do not hold it against any company to make an honest profit, but can you really say that anything over 100% profit is honest? ($4.159 - $1)/$1=316%(profit)<br> </div>I don't see a problem with it, as long as customers keep paying it and WANTING to pay.<br><br>The TWC CEO must be a complete idiot, if you are making that much revenue, why piss off your customers?<br><br>Make a few network upgrades, add new speeds, make people pay more for the new speeds!  Not piss them off, lose customers and business.<br><br>When did executives forget how to treat customers?  You are supposed to kiss their ass, make them feel good, even if you aren't going to fill their needs...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290149</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:44:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290114</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lazlow posted : Tk<br><br>Lets say, for the sake of argument, that Espaeth has a point and we move the total HSI revenue cost from $146 million to an even $1 Billion, which should cover ANY imagined costs. You are still making over four times as much as your costs. I do not hold it against any company to make an honest profit, but can you really say that anything over 100% profit is honest? ($4.159 - $1)/$1=316%(profit)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290114</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:39:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290101</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : I'd call greedy any broadband based company that is attempting to get more money for less service <b>during a rough recession that will stiffle recovery</b><br><br>For all the talk of defending corporations TK, I'm surprised your defending this.  If the economy doesn't recover, which steps like these may make it happen, their won't be any way for corporations to survive.<br><br>With all this said, I think greed is something that works outside of the free market.  If you set your product to be any price, and the customer pays it, then good.  Even if it's billions of dollars.<br><br>If they don't want to pay that, then you go down.  Greed is destruction of free market IMO.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290101</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:37:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290058</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmn1207 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1458955" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1458955');">S_engineer</a>:</small><br><br>Rollover bandwidth...theres an idea. Although you'd have the same congestion at peak times now!<br> </div>Not to mention that it would completely negate the notion that metered billing is a necessity for the continued survival of the cable industry, and not just a money grab.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290058</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:29:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290054</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br> What about greed? $1/gb is not excessive greed? $0.20/text message is not excessive greed?<br><br>I am all for companies making money, but legitimate money. <br><br> </div>And what exactly is greed? At what point does making a profit become greed? Well, that is strictly in the eye of the purchaser. For some people, greed is any company that makes a profit greater than 1%. And for a very few, greed is when a company makes any profit at all. <b>So what is the % that fits your definition of greed?</b> Is it a profit tied to the <A HREF="http://cbdd.wsu.edu/kewlcontent/cdoutput/TOM505/page41.htm">Cost of Capital?</a> Is it a risk weighted return better than you could earn in a so-called safe investment like treasury bills? Is it some % above the rate of inflation?<br><br>So, what is your definition?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290054</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:27:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290034</link>
<description><![CDATA[espaeth posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1106578" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1106578');">delltechkid</a>:</small><br><br>All of the indirect costs you mention would exist even if they didn't provide HSI, as they must have these for TV.  Sure there are a few extra people that they might of had to hire to cover the people who buy only internet, but I'm sure the majority of their HSI customers probably have cable TV as well. </div>There are a number of dual-purpose employees, which is why it's difficult to tie them to a specific product.  Still, if you needed 40 FTE hours/week to serve a function specific to video that same person isn't going to be able to have more time dedicated to HSI.   As workload increases you need more people, even if some of their duties may be shared.<br><br>The HSI call center support staff are different from the video support staff.  There are still many data-only field service techs, and without the HSI product they wouldn't need the CMTS layout they have (and associated employees who manage that), they wouldn't need the abuse staff to deal with DMCA complaints, they wouldn't have as much to manage in terms of ARIN IP netblock allocations, DNS assignments, mail server operations, DNS/DHCP server operations, etc.<br><br>No matter how you look at it, direct costs of a specific service alone are a poor way of relating the total cost of providing that service to revenue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290034</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:23:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290025</link>
<description><![CDATA[S_engineer posted : Rollover bandwidth...theres an idea. Although you'd have the same congestion at peak times now!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290025</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:21:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290021</link>
<description><![CDATA[RARPSL posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>Just like Time Warner didn't want to introduce RR Lite or RR Basic but they wound up being wildly successful, you introduce a new tier, let's call it the Granny Tier, that is based on usage billing. You make it 100% usage based (never happen) or you charge $9.99 month + usage.<br><br> </div>I agree that 100% usage based will never happen since it is not fair either to the ISP or the customer. The way to go is the second method - A flat fee for the making the service available and a per-unit for for your usage of the service. <br><br>This is the way production costs are computed and it fits this situation. To produce widgets, you have an initial cost to set up the machine to produce them and then a per-item cost to produce a widget once the machine is set up. In this case, the set-up is connecting the customer (including billing them) and all the infrastructure needed to deliver access to the Internet. The per-unit cost is the cost of actually using the Internet.<br> <div class="bquote">Then, if people want more speed, but a cheaper monthly price than the unlimited plans, maybe offer a higher speed tier. Price the unlimited at $29.99 a month like it is, but price the usage at $19.99 + usage. You'll inevitably catch people with overages, but you'll at least give them a choice and won't penalize your customers who are comfortable with their current plan or simply don't want to watch their usage. <br> </div>You are confusing the speed that the user can move data with the volume of data that they can move. A higher speed tier has nothing to do with how much data you can move - Only how long it will take you to move it. Unless you want to move more data then a slow tier can handle if used 24/7, all switching to a faster tier does is decrease the amount of time it takes to move the same amount of data. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290021</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:20:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Metered Billing Has Its Place</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290002</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jerm posted : I'm all for $10 + actual use.  IF THEY WOULD CHARGE ONLY THEIR COST OF BW * 2 maximum!!!!<br><br>It has been estimated that large bandwidth companies only pay between $0.05 to $0.10 per GB.  And lets say it takes double that to "get it to your home" and thats still only $0.20 per GB maximum.  So a more than "fair" price might be $0.40 per GB - with it possibly being half that.  <br><br>Heck Amazon's S3 service charges $0.20 per GB.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Metered-Billing-Has-Its-Place-22290002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:15:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

