republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


boogi man

join:2001-11-13
Jacksonville, FL
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to boogi man

Re: it's okay

mitigating circumstances. the contract is to stiff. if i have to move due to some unforeseen issue. why does that mean that i have to pay extra? the point i think of etf's isnt to punish someone who moves but rather to keep a person from being a service provider butterfly. because that would be costly to the company.
--
my site

DannyZ
Gentoo Fanboy
Premium
join:2003-01-29

1 edit

If the contract is too stiff, then the consumer should not have signed it in the first place. Yes, you should have to pay "extra" if you move to an unforeseen issue; paying the ETF is what you agreed to do after all. An ETF is not about punishment but about recouping certain costs, although refusing to prorate is probably used primarily as a way to prevent churn.

Contract law is pretty specific. Under which part of the law do you think the contract should me cancelled? (Hint: "mitigating circumstances" is not a legitimate reason) »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_l···contract
--
Out the 10BaseT, through the modem, down the co-ax, over the fiber, across the backhaul, past the edge router, off the network...nothing but net


Thursday, 31-May 14:34:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics