| reply to Boricua65
Re: Craziness said by Boricua65:People would be crazy to go back to dial-up considering how many websites are built on flash. "Crazy" for most of the audience here, and anyone else that can't live without viewing media on the web.
Considering there is really a whole population out there that wasn't raised on technology and/or don't need the web to live their lives happily, I could see the downgrade for light users, budget conscious or not (Hi Grandma!). Mail on dial up is adequate, informational sites (bank, government forms, etc) don't use media - Even flash sites, that know what's good for them, still include a link to skip flash.
I went on a low budget diet myself a few years ago and backed down to 'gulp' dial-up. I was rarely home as it was, and it was enough to get mail and any occasional larger downloads were multi-tasked with things like coffee fetching and sleeping.  All else I downloaded at work.
I don't see this as a major trend, but it happens even with the sane. |
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| Ok, so let's say 1 out of 100 have needs similar to what you describe. Not the type of interest the ISPs will likely force their marketing efforts towards.
--
Everyone in my family votes democrat except me, I learned how to read. |
|
|
|
| reply to JamesLevinworth
said by JamesLevinworth : it was enough to get mail and any occasional larger downloads were multi-tasked with things like coffee fetching and sleeping. You must have caught up on your sleep, and then some. |
|
| reply to BucknRusty
said by BucknRusty:Ok, so let's say 1 out of 100 have needs similar to what you describe. Not the type of interest the ISPs will likely force their marketing efforts towards. I agree, it's a small market. I just don't see it as really crazy for anyone to do it though. Marketing for this is more wishful thinking, but what else have they got? A bad economy and hopes all those with copper would drop from dsl. Or, maybe it's a publicity stunt........ Got us talking. |
|
