site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
185
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

chronoss2009
Premium
join:2008-09-23
kudos:2

actually recession entertainment

you have barely had a year of it and your crying what recession eh comcast, well those high caps helped you get through it and watch as those with the highest or unlimted are the ones that survive this .....

WRONG time dummmy turner to cap your people.
look at canada they all are losing money despite throttling us for 8 hrs a the day on a 5 megabit or higher account to 256Kbit ( 30Kbytes/sec max) if this is protracted as i figure the numbers will get worse and they will be in trouble having been so greedy....to not invest in capcity to get lessoned caps.

After almost a year and a half they can't say they haven't fixed it yet can they?
What excuse is there?
NONE
cya if the tariff comes through and that's the last money MY FAMILLY gives bell.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Lol.. funny.

The recession has been in play longer than a year, or are you going by the "all is wonderful" rosy picture that he media is painting for you? Even the government has stated, in the US, that the recession has been going on longer than though. With that out of the way....

What's to say that if the Canadian providers DIDN'T cap services that they would have lost money too? It's great to look at only one side of a multi-sided argument, huh? And, that throttling method was in place in many countries for a long time.. albeit, many moved away from it, but stop and think. WHY were those caps in place to begin with? Because the networks didn't support anything other than that. Those countries started to build out and when they did, the restrictions were removed. But, you get now add in the consumer themselves. If they do not want to pay up for service, there is not going to be money to upgrade. This is why I long call for simply raising the base rate and pricing the service honestly. The bells in this country have been dropping the price of DSL for a long time, HOWEVER, it spurred the "Amazon and Google is using my pipes and we want more money!" argument. In the process of dropping the price of DSL, it sure looked good in marketing against cable. ... so who's expense did that come at? .. the consumer. There was no money to really make an honest attempt to upgrade the infrastructure and is why many telco providers still offer lackluster service as compared to cable.

Also, again, you can't compare Canada to the U.S. in this.. your economy is much different than the U.S. as is the general way of thinking and life up there.


Friday, 01-Jun 03:31:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics