
how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic  |
 |
|
|
 Reviews:
·WildBlue
| reply to acid343211
Re: Don't spend a dime on this POS technology!!! said by acid343211:Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms I win . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff.
Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240
Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms | |  pfakBow before me for I am rootPremium join:2002-12-29 Vancouver, BC Reviews:
·TELUS
·Shaw
| PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms
--- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms
I win.. :-- Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community. | |  Reviews:
·WildBlue
| said by pfak:PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms --- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms I win.. :-- Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community. Depends on where you're pinging. =p
Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms | | |
|  | reply to Sircolby45 said by Sircolby45:said by acid343211:Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms I win  . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff. Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms Those are not satellite connections are they? 88ms on a satellite?
Sure we can all post our pings :P
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7000] Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\user>ping youtube.com
Pinging youtube.com [208.117.236.69] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Ping statistics for 208.117.236.69: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 24ms | |  | reply to Sircolby45 said by Sircolby45:said by pfak:PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms 64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms --- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms I win.. :-- Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community. Depends on where you're pinging. =p Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52 Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms I miss my 9ms ping to yahoo.com when I was on SBC's original dsl service years ago.... uverse has some added ping time. | |  Reviews:
·WildBlue
1 edit | reply to doublea said by doublea:said by Sircolby45:said by acid343211:Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms I win  . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff. Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms Those are not satellite connections are they? 88ms on a satellite? Sure we can all post our pings :P Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7000] Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Users\user>ping youtube.com Pinging youtube.com [208.117.236.69] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 208.117.236.69: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 24ms No 88ms is not physically possible on satellite. 480ms how long it takes light to travel without factoring in various delays. I am pinging from a fiber connection. | |  | reply to Sircolby45 those a re some pretty good ping times up above, I wish we could get fiber, or dsl or cable for that matter. We have WB and it is really slow. Online gaming is almost impossible. I try to play Killzone 2 on my PS3 and it's ridiculous. Im trying to unlock all of the classes for offline play, and in doing so i ruin a lot of matches, lol. From when i shoot someone to when they actually die is about a second or two, not lol. What is the average ping for a stadard dsl line? Or the connections found in most college dorms? | |
|