republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Sircolby45

join:2005-11-26
Reviews:
·WildBlue

reply to acid343211

Re: Don't spend a dime on this POS technology!!!

said by acid343211:

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms
I win . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff.

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms


pfak
Bow before me for I am root
Premium
join:2002-12-29
Vancouver, BC
Reviews:
·TELUS
·Shaw

PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms

--- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms

I win.. :--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.



Sircolby45

join:2005-11-26
Reviews:
·WildBlue

said by pfak:

PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms

--- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms

I win.. :--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.
Depends on where you're pinging. =p

Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms


doublea

join:2007-06-04
Petaluma, CA

reply to Sircolby45

said by Sircolby45:

said by acid343211:

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms
I win . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff.

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms
Those are not satellite connections are they? 88ms on a satellite?

Sure we can all post our pings :P

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\user>ping youtube.com

Pinging youtube.com [208.117.236.69] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 208.117.236.69:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 24ms


doublea

join:2007-06-04
Petaluma, CA

reply to Sircolby45

said by Sircolby45:

said by pfak:

PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms

--- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms

I win.. :--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.
Depends on where you're pinging. =p

Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
I miss my 9ms ping to yahoo.com when I was on SBC's original dsl service years ago.... uverse has some added ping time.


Sircolby45

join:2005-11-26
Reviews:
·WildBlue

1 edit

reply to doublea

said by doublea:

said by Sircolby45:

said by acid343211:

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms
I win . The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff.

Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms
Those are not satellite connections are they? 88ms on a satellite?

Sure we can all post our pings :P

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\user>ping youtube.com

Pinging youtube.com [208.117.236.69] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 208.117.236.69:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 24ms
No 88ms is not physically possible on satellite. 480ms how long it takes light to travel without factoring in various delays. I am pinging from a fiber connection.

dashock333

join:2007-11-18
Pine Grove, PA

reply to Sircolby45
those a re some pretty good ping times up above, I wish we could get fiber, or dsl or cable for that matter.
We have WB and it is really slow. Online gaming is almost impossible. I try to play Killzone 2 on my PS3 and it's ridiculous. Im trying to unlock all of the classes for offline play, and in doing so i ruin a lot of matches, lol. From when i shoot someone to when they actually die is about a second or two, not lol.
What is the average ping for a stadard dsl line? Or the connections found in most college dorms?


Thursday, 31-May 19:26:43 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics